Suppr超能文献

与隐形矫治器相比,六种细胞因子和骨代谢生物标志物在接受固定正畸矫治器治疗患者龈沟液中的作用:一项临床研究。

Role of six cytokines and bone metabolism biomarkers in gingival crevicular fluid in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic appliance treatment in comparison with aligners: a clinical study.

作者信息

Kamran Muhammad Abdullah, Alnazeh Abdullah A, Almagbol Mohammad, Almoammar Salem, Alhaizaey Ali Hasan A, Alshahrani Ibrahim

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2023 May 1;93(3):335-340. doi: 10.2319/091722-649.1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to assess bone biomarkers and cytokines in patients with conventional labial appliances (CLAs) and aligners.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants were recruited to undergo orthodontic treatment with CLAs and aligners according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Periodontal examination was accomplished at baseline and 4 weeks using the plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), and bleeding on probing (BoP). Samples of gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) were collected at baseline (T0) before the start of treatment and at the 1-month follow-up (T1) to assess bone metabolic and inflammatory biomarkers. GCF from participants with CLAs and aligners was evaluated with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Comparison between labial conventional orthodontic treatment and aligners were assessed using an unpaired t-test. The difference between T0 and T1 was measured using a paired t-test.

RESULTS

BoP, PI, and GI demonstrated no significant difference between participants treated with aligners and subjects with CLAs at baseline and at 4 weeks (P > .05). Bone markers and other biomarkers (tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin [IL]-α, IL-2, IL-6, and IL-8) showed significant differences (P < .05). Also, a significant difference between CLAs and aligners was noted among all biomarkers (P < .05) except IL-β.

CONCLUSIONS

Aligners and CLAs increase the level of inflammatory and bone metabolic biomarkers after 1 month.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估使用传统唇侧矫治器(CLAs)和隐形矫治器的患者的骨生物标志物和细胞因子。

材料与方法

根据预先定义的纳入和排除标准,招募接受CLAs和隐形矫治器正畸治疗的参与者。在基线和4周时使用菌斑指数(PI)、牙龈指数(GI)和探诊出血(BoP)进行牙周检查。在治疗开始前的基线(T0)和1个月随访(T1)时收集龈沟液(GCF)样本,以评估骨代谢和炎症生物标志物。使用酶联免疫吸附测定法评估使用CLAs和隐形矫治器的参与者的GCF。使用不成对t检验评估唇侧传统正畸治疗与隐形矫治器之间的差异。使用配对t检验测量T0和T1之间的差异。

结果

在基线和4周时,使用隐形矫治器治疗的参与者与使用CLAs的受试者之间的BoP、PI和GI无显著差异(P>.05)。骨标志物和其他生物标志物(肿瘤坏死因子α、白细胞介素[IL]-α、IL-2、IL-6和IL-8)显示出显著差异(P<.05)。此外,除IL-β外,所有生物标志物在CLAs和隐形矫治器之间均存在显著差异(P<.05)。

结论

1个月后,隐形矫治器和CLAs会增加炎症和骨代谢生物标志物的水平。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验