Nutrition and Dietetic Service, National Cancer Institute José Alencar Gomes da Silva, Palliative Care Unit, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Nutr Clin Pract. 2024 Apr;39(2):485-499. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10953. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
To propose and evaluate the clinical utility of a new nutrition screening algorithm, NutriPal, to detect the degree of nutritional risk in patients with incurable cancer receiving palliative care.
It is a prospective cohort conducted in an oncology palliative care unit. The NutriPal algorithm was used in a three-step process: (i) administration of the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment short form; (ii) calculation of the Glasgow Prognostic Score; and (iii) application of the algorithm to classify patients into four degrees of nutritional risk. The higher the degrees of NutriPal, the worse the nutritional risk, comparing nutritional measures, laboratory data, and overall survival (OS).
The study included 451 patients that were classified using the NutriPal. They were allocated to the degrees: 1 (31.26%), 2 (27.49%), 3 (21.73%), and 4 (19.71%). Statistically significant differences were found in most of the nutritional and laboratory parameters and in OS with each increment in the NutriPal degrees, and OS was reduced (log-rank <0.001). In addition, NutriPal was able to predict a 120-day mortality: there was a significantly higher risk of death in the patients classified as degrees 4 (hazard ratio [HR], 3.03; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.18-4.19), 3 (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.46-2.78), and 2 (HR, 1.42; 95% CI; 1.04-1.95) than in those classified as degree 1. It also showed good predictive accuracy (concordance statistic, 0.76).
The NutriPal is associated to nutritional and laboratory parameters and can predict survival. It could therefore be incorporated into clinical practice for patients with incurable cancer receiving palliative care.
提出并评估一种新的营养筛查算法 NutriPal,以检测接受姑息治疗的不可治愈癌症患者的营养风险程度。
这是一项在肿瘤姑息治疗病房进行的前瞻性队列研究。NutriPal 算法分三步进行:(i)使用患者生成的主观整体评估简短形式;(ii)计算格拉斯哥预后评分;(iii)应用算法将患者分为四个营养风险程度。NutriPal 程度越高,营养风险越差,比较营养措施、实验室数据和总生存期(OS)。
该研究纳入了 451 名使用 NutriPal 分类的患者。他们被分配到以下程度:1(31.26%)、2(27.49%)、3(21.73%)和 4(19.71%)。随着 NutriPal 程度的增加,大多数营养和实验室参数以及 OS 均存在统计学显著差异,OS 降低(对数秩检验<0.001)。此外,NutriPal 能够预测 120 天死亡率:分类为 4 度(危险比[HR],3.03;95%置信区间[95%CI],2.18-4.19)、3 度(HR,2.01;95%CI,1.46-2.78)和 2 度(HR,1.42;95%CI,1.04-1.95)的患者死亡风险显著高于分类为 1 度的患者。它还表现出良好的预测准确性(一致性统计量,0.76)。
NutriPal 与营养和实验室参数相关,可以预测生存。因此,它可以纳入接受姑息治疗的不可治愈癌症患者的临床实践。