Kholodnaya Marina A, Sipovskaya Yana I
Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Psychol Russ. 2021 Jun 30;14(2):86-100. doi: 10.11621/pir2021.0206. eCollection 2021.
This article analyzes the relationship between sensory-emotional experience in the process of semantic description of vague visual figures, and the level of conceptual (categorical and generative) abilities.
The objective of our study was, first, to show the differences in the degree and features of activation of elements of sensory-emotional experience in the process of constructing the meanings of vague visual figures; and, second, to show the relationship of these differences with the level of categorical and generative abilities.
We studied 102 older adolescents ages 15-16 years. The research program included the following methods: 1) "Description of vague figures" (E.Yu. Artemyeva's technique change, 1980; 1999); 2) "Generalization of three words" (Kholodnaya, 2012; Kholodnaya et al., 2019); and 3) "Conceptual synthesis" (Kholodnaya, 2012; Kholodnaya et al., 2019).
Our results showed that generative abilities play the leading role in determining the degree of severity and diversity of different modalities in forming visual meanings, as compared with categorical abilities. The transition simulation hypothesis explains the results. However, the embodied character of mental modeling (simulation) is not determined "bottom-up" by the individual's bodily state or the activity of corresponding brain zones. On the contrary, conceptual (namely, generative) structures determine the form of the conceptual representations from the "top down."
Generative abilities represent the highest level of organization of personal conceptual experience, which acquires a multimodal quality, due to the integral nature of conceptual (generative) structures.
本文分析了对模糊视觉图形进行语义描述过程中的感官 - 情感体验与概念(分类和生成)能力水平之间的关系。
我们研究的目的首先是展示在构建模糊视觉图形意义的过程中,感官 - 情感体验元素激活程度和特征的差异;其次是展示这些差异与分类和生成能力水平的关系。
我们研究了102名15 - 16岁的青少年。研究方案包括以下方法:1)“模糊图形描述”(E.Yu.阿尔捷米耶娃技术的变体,1980年;1999年);2)“三个词的概括”(霍洛德尼亚,2012年;霍洛德尼亚等人,2019年);3)“概念合成”(霍洛德尼亚,2012年;霍洛德尼亚等人,2019年)。
我们的结果表明,与分类能力相比,生成能力在决定形成视觉意义时不同模态的严重程度和多样性方面起主导作用。过渡模拟假说是对结果的解释。然而,心理建模(模拟)的具身特征并非由个体的身体状态或相应脑区的活动“自下而上”决定。相反,概念(即生成)结构从“自上而下”决定概念表征的形式。
生成能力代表了个人概念体验的最高组织水平,由于概念(生成)结构的整体性,这种体验具有多模态性质。