• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不适当的介入?根据德国法律,为生活在痴呆症中的人制定预先指示的准备阶段的实证洞察。

Inappropriate Involvement? Presenting Empirical Insight into the Preparation Phase of Advance Directives of Persons Living with Dementia Under German Legislation.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Cognitive Disorders, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Institute of Humanities in Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Aging Soc Policy. 2024 Sep 2;36(5):841-856. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2023.2182565. Epub 2023 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1080/08959420.2023.2182565
PMID:36814064
Abstract

The scholarly debate on advance directives (ADs) in the context of dementia is mainly built around ethical arguments. Empirical studies that shed light into the realities of ADs of persons living with dementia are few and far between and too little is known about the effect of national AD legislation on such realities. This paper offers insight into the preparation phase of ADs according to German legislation in the context of dementia. It presents results from a document analysis of 100 ADs and from 25 episodic interviews with family members. Findings show that drafting an AD involves family members and different professionals in addition to the signatory, whose cognitive impairment differed considerably at the time of preparing the AD. The involvement of family members and professionals is at times problematic, which prompts the question of how much and what kind of involvement of others turns an AD a person living with dementia into an AD a person living with dementia. The results invite policy makers to critically review legislation on ADs from the perspective of cognitively impaired persons, who might find it difficult to protect themselves from inappropriate involvement when completing an AD.

摘要

关于痴呆症背景下的预先指示 (AD) 的学术争论主要围绕伦理论点展开。很少有实证研究能深入了解痴呆症患者 AD 的实际情况,而且我们对国家 AD 立法对这些实际情况的影响知之甚少。本文探讨了德国立法背景下痴呆症患者 AD 的准备阶段。它展示了对 100 份 AD 文档分析和对 25 名家庭成员进行的间歇性访谈的结果。研究结果表明,起草 AD 除了签名人之外,还涉及家庭成员和不同的专业人员,而签名人在准备 AD 时的认知障碍差异很大。家庭成员和专业人员的参与有时会出现问题,这就提出了一个问题,即多少程度和什么样的他人参与会将 AD 变成一个痴呆症患者的 AD。研究结果邀请政策制定者从认知障碍者的角度来批判性地审查 AD 立法,这些人在填写 AD 时可能很难保护自己免受不当的参与。

相似文献

1
Inappropriate Involvement? Presenting Empirical Insight into the Preparation Phase of Advance Directives of Persons Living with Dementia Under German Legislation.不适当的介入?根据德国法律,为生活在痴呆症中的人制定预先指示的准备阶段的实证洞察。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2024 Sep 2;36(5):841-856. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2023.2182565. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
2
Irrelevant Interests? A Qualitative Study Into How German Family Surrogates of Persons Living With Dementia Fulfill Their Legal Role as Advocates of an Advance Directive.无关利益?对德国痴呆症患者家庭代孕者如何履行其作为预先指示倡导者的法律角色的定性研究。
Gerontologist. 2024 Apr 1;64(4). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnad119.
3
Advance directives and power of attorney for health care in the oldest-old - results of the AgeQualiDe study.高龄老人的预先医疗指示和医疗保健委托书——AgeQualiDe研究结果
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Apr 13;17(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0482-8.
4
Advance directives need full legal status in persons with dementia.痴呆患者的预先指示需要具有完全的法律地位。
Nurs Ethics. 2024 Nov;31(7):1247-1257. doi: 10.1177/09697330241247320. Epub 2024 May 6.
5
Role of written advance directives in decision making: insights from qualitative and quantitative data.书面预先指示在决策中的作用:来自定性和定量数据的见解
J Gen Intern Med. 1998 Jul;13(7):439-46. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00132.x.
6
Advance directives in dementia: issues of validity and effectiveness.痴呆症中的预先指示:有效性和可行性问题。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2010 Mar;22(2):201-8. doi: 10.1017/S1041610209990706. Epub 2009 Aug 10.
7
Advance directives for seriously ill hospitalized patients: effectiveness with the patient self-determination act and the SUPPORT intervention. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.重症住院患者的预立医疗指示:《患者自主决定法案》及SUPPORT干预措施的效果。SUPPORT研究人员。了解治疗结果和风险的预后及偏好研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 Apr;45(4):500-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb05178.x.
8
Advance (Meta-) Directives for Patients with Dementia who Appear Content: Learning from a Nationwide Survey.针对看似满意的痴呆症患者的预先(元)指令:来自全国性调查的经验教训。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Apr 1;17(4):294-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.01.014. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
9
Advance directives in nursing homes: prevalence, validity, significance, and nursing staff adherence.养老院中的预先指示:流行程度、有效性、意义以及护理人员的遵守情况。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012 Sep;109(37):577-83. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0577. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
10
Social regulation activities in end-of-life: a qualitative study on completion of advance directives in Swiss nursing homes.社会调节活动在临终关怀中的作用:瑞士养老院完成预立医疗指示的定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Apr 23;19(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00562-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating Dementia and Delirium: Balancing Identity and Interests in Advance Directives.应对痴呆与谵妄:在预先指示中平衡身份与利益
Nurs Philos. 2025 Jan;26(1):e70016. doi: 10.1111/nup.70016.