School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Cognitive Disorders, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Institute of Humanities in Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
J Aging Soc Policy. 2024 Sep 2;36(5):841-856. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2023.2182565. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
The scholarly debate on advance directives (ADs) in the context of dementia is mainly built around ethical arguments. Empirical studies that shed light into the realities of ADs of persons living with dementia are few and far between and too little is known about the effect of national AD legislation on such realities. This paper offers insight into the preparation phase of ADs according to German legislation in the context of dementia. It presents results from a document analysis of 100 ADs and from 25 episodic interviews with family members. Findings show that drafting an AD involves family members and different professionals in addition to the signatory, whose cognitive impairment differed considerably at the time of preparing the AD. The involvement of family members and professionals is at times problematic, which prompts the question of how much and what kind of involvement of others turns an AD a person living with dementia into an AD a person living with dementia. The results invite policy makers to critically review legislation on ADs from the perspective of cognitively impaired persons, who might find it difficult to protect themselves from inappropriate involvement when completing an AD.
关于痴呆症背景下的预先指示 (AD) 的学术争论主要围绕伦理论点展开。很少有实证研究能深入了解痴呆症患者 AD 的实际情况,而且我们对国家 AD 立法对这些实际情况的影响知之甚少。本文探讨了德国立法背景下痴呆症患者 AD 的准备阶段。它展示了对 100 份 AD 文档分析和对 25 名家庭成员进行的间歇性访谈的结果。研究结果表明,起草 AD 除了签名人之外,还涉及家庭成员和不同的专业人员,而签名人在准备 AD 时的认知障碍差异很大。家庭成员和专业人员的参与有时会出现问题,这就提出了一个问题,即多少程度和什么样的他人参与会将 AD 变成一个痴呆症患者的 AD。研究结果邀请政策制定者从认知障碍者的角度来批判性地审查 AD 立法,这些人在填写 AD 时可能很难保护自己免受不当的参与。