Aginsky K D, Keen K, Neophytou N
Centre for Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, School of Therapeutic Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.
S Afr J Sports Med. 2022 Jan 1;34(1):v34i1a12984. doi: 10.17159/2078-516X/2022/v34i1a12984. eCollection 2022.
Bridge and plank holding times are used to evaluate core stability. Transversus abdominis (TA) muscle function is assessed using ultrasound and also provides input on an individual's core stability.
A correlation study comparing TA muscle function with bridge and plank holding time in club cricketers.
Seventeen male, premier league cricketers (age: 22.1 ± 3.3 years) participated in this study. Ultrasound was used to measure bilateral TA, internal oblique (OI) and external oblique (OE) muscle thickness at rest and during abdominal hollowing. Muscle function was measured by means of a Pearson's correlation as the change in muscle thickness from rest to abdominal hollowing and compared to holding time of the bench bridge and prone plank (seconds).
TA muscle thickness was preferentially recruited bilaterally (p=0.00001) during abdominal hollowing. No significant correlations were found between TA muscle function and holding time for the bench bridge (dominant (D): r = 0.03 [95% CI:-0.46-0.50]; non-dominant (ND): r = -0.02 [95% CI:-0.50-0.47]) or prone plank (D: r = -0.16 [95% CI:-0.60-0.34]; ND: r = -0.13 [95% CI:-0.57-0.38]).
Prone plank and bench bridge holding times are not correlated with TA muscle function during abdominal hollowing. Core stability cannot rely on a single test to evaluate its effectiveness. In particular, the contribution of the local and global muscle system to 'core stability' needs to be evaluated independently. Therefore these tests are not sensitive enough to evaluate the contribution of the local muscle system to the global muscle system in a healthy, pain free, sporting population.
桥撑和平板支撑的保持时间用于评估核心稳定性。腹横肌(TA)的肌肉功能通过超声进行评估,并且也能为个体的核心稳定性提供信息。
一项关于俱乐部板球运动员腹横肌肌肉功能与桥撑和平板支撑保持时间的相关性研究。
17名男性超级联赛板球运动员(年龄:22.1±3.3岁)参与了本研究。使用超声测量静息状态下以及收腹时双侧TA、腹内斜肌(OI)和腹外斜肌(OE)的肌肉厚度。通过皮尔逊相关性测量肌肉功能,即从静息状态到收腹时肌肉厚度的变化,并与仰卧桥撑和俯卧平板支撑的保持时间(秒)进行比较。
收腹时双侧TA肌肉厚度优先被募集(p = 0.00001)。在仰卧桥撑(优势侧(D):r = 0.03 [95% CI:-0.46 - 0.50];非优势侧(ND):r = -0.02 [95% CI:-0.50 - 0.47])或俯卧平板支撑(D:r = -0.16 [95% CI:-0.60 - 0.34];ND:r = -0.13 [95% CI:-0.57 - 0.38])中,未发现TA肌肉功能与保持时间之间存在显著相关性。
俯卧平板支撑和仰卧桥撑的保持时间与收腹时TA肌肉功能无关。核心稳定性不能仅依靠单一测试来评估其有效性。特别是,局部和整体肌肉系统对“核心稳定性”的贡献需要独立评估。因此,这些测试对于评估健康、无疼痛的运动人群中局部肌肉系统对整体肌肉系统的贡献不够敏感。