• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MCMI基本人格量表的因素结构与共同项目假象

Factor structure of the MCMI basic personality scales and common-item artifact.

作者信息

Retzlaff P D, Gibertini M

机构信息

Veterans Administration Medical Center, Tampa, Florida.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 1987 Winter;51(4):588-94. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5104_10.

DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa5104_10
PMID:3681645
Abstract

The eight basic personality scales of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI) were derived from Millon's theory of personality, but the adequacy of the MCMI for measuring Millon's personality constructs has never been assessed. One major problem with using factor analysis to illuminate the structure of the MCMI personality scales is that artifactual structure may result from item overlap among the scales. To analyze this, item-overlap coefficients were factored and compared to the factor structures of five subject samples. For the eight basic personality scales, three factors emerged for the overlap matrix and each of the five sample matrices: Aloof-Social, Aggressive-Submissive, and Lability-Restraint. It was concluded that these three factors are inconsistent with Millon's theory and that they will be found artifactually across a wide variety of populations due to overlapping items.

摘要

明尼苏达临床多轴问卷(MCMI)的八个基本人格量表源自米隆的人格理论,但MCMI在测量米隆人格结构方面的充分性从未得到评估。使用因素分析来阐明MCMI人格量表结构的一个主要问题是,量表之间的项目重叠可能导致人为结构。为了对此进行分析,对项目重叠系数进行了因素分析,并与五个受试者样本的因素结构进行了比较。对于八个基本人格量表,重叠矩阵和五个样本矩阵中的每一个都出现了三个因素:冷漠-社交、攻击性-顺从性和情绪易变-克制性。得出的结论是,这三个因素与米隆的理论不一致,并且由于项目重叠,它们会在各种各样的人群中人为地出现。

相似文献

1
Factor structure of the MCMI basic personality scales and common-item artifact.MCMI基本人格量表的因素结构与共同项目假象
J Pers Assess. 1987 Winter;51(4):588-94. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5104_10.
2
The convergent and discriminant validity of the MCMI as a measure of the DSM-III personality disorders.作为《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)人格障碍测量工具的米隆临床多轴问卷(MCMI)的收敛效度和区分效度。
J Pers Assess. 1987 Summer;51(2):228-42. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5102_7.
3
Development and validation of an adjective check list to assess the Millon personality types in a normal population.
J Pers Assess. 1987 Winter;51(4):572-87. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5104_9.
4
The MCMI as a measure of DSM-III.作为《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版测量工具的米隆临床多轴问卷。
J Pers Assess. 1985 Aug;49(4):366-78. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4904_4.
5
A multitrait-multimethod analysis of the MCMI-II clinical syndrome scales.明尼苏达多项人格问卷第二版(MCMI-II)临床综合征量表的多特质-多方法分析。
J Pers Assess. 1990 Winter;55(3-4):465-76. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674084.
6
An MCMI-II item-level component analysis: personality and clinical factors.《米隆临床多轴问卷第二版(MCMI-II)项目级成分分析:人格与临床因素》
J Pers Assess. 1991 Oct;57(2):323-34. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5702_10.
7
Defense mechanisms and personality disorders: an empirical test of Millon's theory.
J Pers Assess. 1995 Feb;64(1):132-44. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6401_9.
8
Relationship between MCMI-II scales and normal personality traits.明尼苏达多项人格问卷第二版(MCMI-II)量表与正常人格特质之间的关系。
Psychol Rep. 1992 Dec;71(3 Pt 1):699-705. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1992.71.3.699.
9
The stability of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory for psychiatric inpatients.用于精神科住院患者的米隆临床多轴问卷的稳定性。
J Pers Assess. 1986 Summer;50(2):193-7. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5002_5.
10
Relationship between personality disorders and clinical symptoms in psychiatric inpatients as measured by the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory.通过米隆临床多轴问卷测量精神科住院患者人格障碍与临床症状之间的关系。
Psychol Rep. 1994 Feb;74(1):331-6. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1994.74.1.331.