Veiga G N, Torres G, Maposa I
Centre for Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, School of Therapeutic Sciences, Faculty of Health Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
S Afr J Sports Med. 2021 Aug 11;33(1):v33i1a9244. doi: 10.17159/2078-516X/2021/v33i1a9244. eCollection 2021.
The relationship between acute:chronic workload ratios (ACWR) and the incidence of injury, as well as the relationship between subjective wellness scores and training load, is unclear in hockey players.
This study investigated these relationships to determine if the ACWR is a useful workload management tool for field hockey players. In addition, the study investigated the association between specific subjective wellness scores (fatigue, sleep quality, general muscle soreness, mood and stress level) and the acute:chronic workload ratio and training load. The study also assessed the association between individual players' training loads with the self-reported wellness scores.
Fourteen male field hockey players from the men's first team at the University of the Witwatersrand participated in the study over ten weeks during a premier league competition phase. A Google form was completed within thirty minutes of every training session/match. This form consisted of questions that allowed for the calculation of the ACWR.
No incidence of injury was reported during the ten-week period. ACWR scores ranged between 0.67 and 1.87. The ACWR was associated with general muscle soreness (p = 0.010) and training load was associated with fatigue (p = 0.002), sleep quality (p = 0.05), general muscle soreness (p = 0.004), and mood (p=0.025).
There may be some merit in the use of subjective wellness measures as workload management tools in field hockey. Further research is required to determine if there is an optimal ACWR for this sport.
在曲棍球运动员中,急性与慢性工作量比率(ACWR)与受伤发生率之间的关系,以及主观健康评分与训练负荷之间的关系尚不清楚。
本研究调查了这些关系,以确定ACWR是否是适用于曲棍球运动员的工作量管理工具。此外,该研究还调查了特定主观健康评分(疲劳、睡眠质量、全身肌肉酸痛、情绪和压力水平)与急性与慢性工作量比率及训练负荷之间的关联。该研究还评估了个体运动员的训练负荷与自我报告的健康评分之间的关联。
来自威特沃特斯兰德大学男子一队的14名男性曲棍球运动员在超级联赛比赛阶段的十周内参与了该研究。每次训练课/比赛结束后30分钟内完成一份谷歌表格。该表格包含一些问题,用于计算ACWR。
在为期十周的期间内未报告有受伤情况。ACWR评分在0.67至1.87之间。ACWR与全身肌肉酸痛相关(p = 0.010),训练负荷与疲劳(p = 0.002)、睡眠质量(p = 0.05)、全身肌肉酸痛(p = 0.004)和情绪(p = 0.025)相关。
在曲棍球运动中,使用主观健康指标作为工作量管理工具可能有一定价值。需要进一步研究以确定这项运动是否存在最佳ACWR。