Climent Carla, Soriano Sandra, Bonfill Teresa, Lopez Natalia, Rodriguez Marta, Sierra Marina, Andreu Pablo, Fragio Monica, Busquets Mireia, Carrasco Alicia, Cano Ona, Seguí Miguel-Angel, Gallardo Enrique
Department of Medical Oncology, Consorcio Hospital Universitario Parc Tauli, Sabadell, Spain.
Front Oncol. 2023 Feb 3;13:941835. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.941835. eCollection 2023.
The category of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) includes several clinically, histologically, and molecularly diverse entities. Traditionally, they comprise type 1 and type 2 papillary, chromophobe, unclassified, and other histologies (medullary, collecting duct carcinoma, and translocation-associated). Molecular knowledge has allowed the identification of some other specific subtypes, such as fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma (RCC) or succinate dehydrogenase-associated RCC. In addition, it has recognized some alterations with a possible predictive role, e.g., MET proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase (MET) alterations in papillary tumors. Standard therapies for the management of advanced clear cell RCC (ccRCC), i.e., vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) pathway inhibitors and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, have shown poorer results in nccRCC patients. Therefore, there is a need to improve the efficacy of the treatment for advanced nccRCC. Immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), has demonstrated a significant survival benefit in several malignant neoplasias, including ccRCC, with a proportion of patients achieving long survival. The combinations of ICI or ICI + VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the standard of care in advanced ccRCC. Unfortunately, major pivotal trials did not include specific nccRCC populations. In recent years, several studies have retrospectively or prospectively evaluated ICIs alone or in combination with another ICI or with TKIs in nccRCC patients. In this article, we review data from available trials in order to elucidate clinical and molecular profiles that could benefit from immunotherapy approaches.
非透明细胞肾细胞癌(nccRCC)类别包括几种在临床、组织学和分子水平上具有多样性的实体。传统上,它们包括1型和2型乳头状、嫌色细胞、未分类以及其他组织学类型(髓样、集合管癌和易位相关型)。分子层面的认识使得人们能够识别出一些其他特定亚型,如富马酸水合酶缺陷型肾细胞癌(RCC)或琥珀酸脱氢酶相关型RCC。此外,还认识到一些可能具有预测作用的改变,例如乳头状肿瘤中的MET原癌基因受体酪氨酸激酶(MET)改变。晚期透明细胞RCC(ccRCC)的标准治疗方法,即血管内皮生长因子受体(VEGFR)通路抑制剂和雷帕霉素靶蛋白抑制剂,在nccRCC患者中显示出较差的疗效。因此,有必要提高晚期nccRCC的治疗效果。免疫疗法,尤其是针对程序性死亡蛋白1/程序性死亡配体1和细胞毒性T淋巴细胞相关蛋白4(CTLA-4)的免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI),已在包括ccRCC在内的几种恶性肿瘤中显示出显著的生存获益,一部分患者实现了长期生存。ICI或ICI + VEGFR酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)联合治疗是晚期ccRCC的标准治疗方案。不幸的是,主要的关键试验并未纳入特定的nccRCC人群。近年来,多项研究对nccRCC患者单独使用ICI或ICI与另一种ICI或TKI联合使用进行了回顾性或前瞻性评估。在本文中,我们回顾现有试验的数据,以阐明可能从免疫治疗方法中获益的临床和分子特征。