• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

沿海带生态系统健康诊断:中国案例。

Health diagnosis of coastal zone ecosystem: China's case.

机构信息

Business College, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.

Management College, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, Shandong, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 2;11:1038761. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1038761. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1038761
PMID:36817883
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9932329/
Abstract

With its unique geographical location, the coastal zone has concentrated great advantages in resources, population and economy. However, with the deepening of marine resources development activities, a series of problems have emerged in the coastal zone, such as the gradual shortage of resources, the decline of environmental quality and the increase of ecological risks. The coastal zone ecosystem has shown a certain degradation trend. Maintaining the health of the coastal zone ecosystem has become the primary task of the sustainable development of the marine economy. Monitoring the coastal ecosystem carrying capacity, diagnosing the health status of the coastal ecosystem, effectively planning and managing the development and utilization of natural resources in the coastal zone, and controlling human activities related to the sea within the ecological carrying capacity and health limits of the coastal zone are of great significance to the sustainable development of society and economy in the coastal zone. In this study, the ecosystem health model, state space model and ecological health early warning principle were comprehensively applied to construct the coastal ecosystem health diagnosis framework of "Carrying type Early warning degree Health level;" The evaluation index system of coastal ecosystem carrying capacity was established; Taking Shandong Province as the empirical research object, the health status of the coastal ecosystem in Shandong Province was diagnosed by using the relevant data from 2007 to 2019. The empirical results show that: (1) From 2007 to 2013, the carrying capacity of the coastal ecosystem in Shandong Province was relatively good, in the state of "loadable" or "critical overload," while from 2014 to 2019, the carrying capacity was poor, in the state of "overload;" (2) From 2007 to 2013, the early warning degree of coastal ecosystem health in Shandong Province was in the state of "no alarm," "light alarm," and "medium alarm," and the health level was in the state of "very healthy," "healthy," and "sub-health;" from 2014 to 2019, the health warning level of the coastal ecosystem in Shandong Province was in the state of "serious alarm" and "extremely serious alarm," and the health level was in the state of "unhealthy" and "Morbid," and the health status was worrying; (3) The key influencing factors affecting the carrying capacity of the coastal ecosystem mainly included the output of marine mining, marine GDP, per capita marine production, total amount of main pollutants directly discharged into the sea, domestic tourist arrivals in coastal cities, area of marine nature reserves, proportion of class IV and inferior class IV seawater, average density of beach garbage in the monitoring area, number of medical and health institutions; Finally, some policy suggestions were put forward to improve the health of coastal ecosystem in Shandong Province. In the "discussion" part of this study, the consistency between the research results of this paper and the actual situation of the marine ecosystem in Shandong Province and the existing research results of the same kind is compared, and the applicability and limitations of the research methods in this paper are put forward, indicating that the research methods in this paper are more applicable to the comparative analysis under the same ideal value determination criteria.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e416/9932329/495e96c5a90d/fpubh-11-1038761-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e416/9932329/efcf8872e809/fpubh-11-1038761-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e416/9932329/31aebd41e681/fpubh-11-1038761-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e416/9932329/ccf4a1c008ac/fpubh-11-1038761-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e416/9932329/92648923bf64/fpubh-11-1038761-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e416/9932329/bc3a53fae063/fpubh-11-1038761-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e416/9932329/827e2c3945fd/fpubh-11-1038761-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e416/9932329/4d95b739b248/fpubh-11-1038761-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e416/9932329/4af418a9007b/fpubh-11-1038761-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e416/9932329/d46a4b328b65/fpubh-11-1038761-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e416/9932329/d7e65d838cc3/fpubh-11-1038761-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e416/9932329/495e96c5a90d/fpubh-11-1038761-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e416/9932329/efcf8872e809/fpubh-11-1038761-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e416/9932329/31aebd41e681/fpubh-11-1038761-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e416/9932329/ccf4a1c008ac/fpubh-11-1038761-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e416/9932329/92648923bf64/fpubh-11-1038761-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e416/9932329/bc3a53fae063/fpubh-11-1038761-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e416/9932329/827e2c3945fd/fpubh-11-1038761-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e416/9932329/4d95b739b248/fpubh-11-1038761-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e416/9932329/4af418a9007b/fpubh-11-1038761-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e416/9932329/d46a4b328b65/fpubh-11-1038761-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e416/9932329/d7e65d838cc3/fpubh-11-1038761-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e416/9932329/495e96c5a90d/fpubh-11-1038761-g0011.jpg
摘要

具有独特地理位置的沿海地带,在资源、人口和经济方面集中了巨大优势。然而,随着海洋资源开发活动的深入,沿海地带出现了一系列问题,如资源逐渐短缺、环境质量下降和生态风险增加。沿海地带生态系统呈现出一定的退化趋势。维护沿海地带生态系统的健康已成为海洋经济可持续发展的首要任务。监测沿海生态系统承载能力,诊断沿海生态系统健康状况,有效规划和管理沿海地带自然资源的开发利用,控制人类活动对沿海地带生态承载能力和健康极限内的海洋,对沿海地带社会经济的可持续发展具有重要意义。本研究综合运用生态系统健康模型、状态空间模型和生态健康预警原理,构建了“承载型-预警度-健康水平”的沿海生态系统健康诊断框架;建立了沿海生态系统承载能力评价指标体系;以山东省为实证研究对象,利用 2007 年至 2019 年的相关数据,对山东省沿海生态系统健康状况进行了诊断。实证结果表明:(1)2007 年至 2013 年,山东省沿海生态系统承载能力较好,处于“可承载”或“临界超载”状态,而 2014 年至 2019 年,承载能力较差,处于“超载”状态;(2)2007 年至 2013 年,山东省沿海生态系统健康预警程度处于“无警”、“轻警”和“中警”状态,健康水平处于“很健康”、“健康”和“亚健康”状态;2014 年至 2019 年,山东省沿海生态系统健康预警水平处于“严重警”和“极度警”状态,健康水平处于“不健康”和“病态”状态,健康状况令人担忧;(3)影响沿海生态系统承载能力的关键影响因素主要包括海洋矿产产量、海洋 GDP、海洋人均产值、主要污染物直接入海总量、沿海城市国内旅游人数、海洋自然保护区面积、四类和劣四类海水比例、监测区海滩垃圾平均密度、医疗卫生机构数量;最后,提出了一些改善山东省沿海生态系统健康的政策建议。在本研究的“讨论”部分,比较了本文的研究结果与山东省海洋生态系统的实际情况和同类研究的现有研究结果的一致性,并提出了本文研究方法的适用性和局限性,表明本文的研究方法更适用于相同理想值确定标准下的比较分析。

相似文献

1
Health diagnosis of coastal zone ecosystem: China's case.沿海带生态系统健康诊断:中国案例。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 2;11:1038761. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1038761. eCollection 2023.
2
Construction and influencing factors of an early warning system for marine ranching ecological security: Experience from China's coastal areas.海洋牧场生态安全预警系统的构建及影响因素:来自中国沿海地区的经验
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jun 1;335:117515. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117515. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
3
Spatiotemporal changes caused by the intensive use of sea areas in the liaoning coastal economic zone of China.中国辽宁沿海经济带海域高强度利用引起的时空变化。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 30;15(11):e0242977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242977. eCollection 2020.
4
Evaluation of regional sustainability through emergy analysis: a case study of nine cities in the Yellow River Basin of China.通过能值分析评价区域可持续性——以中国黄河流域的九个城市为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jun;29(26):40213-40225. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-18916-6. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
5
Assessment of the Carrying Capacity and Suitability of Spatial Resources and the Environment and Diagnosis of Obstacle Factors in the Yellow River Basin.黄河流域空间资源环境承载能力和适宜性评价及障碍因子诊断
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 16;20(4):3496. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043496.
6
China's coastal wetlands: conservation history, implementation efforts, existing issues and strategies for future improvement.中国沿海湿地:保护历史、实施努力、现有问题及未来改善策略。
Environ Int. 2015 Jun;79:25-41. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.02.017. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
7
[Cross-scale spatiotemporal characteristics of landscape ecological conditions index in coastal zone of Jiangsu Province, China during 1990-2020.].[1990—2020年中国江苏省海岸带景观生态状况指数的跨尺度时空特征]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2022 Feb;33(2):489-499. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202202.016.
8
Territorial Pattern Evolution and Its Comprehensive Carrying Capacity Evaluation in the Coastal Area of Beibu Gulf, China.北部湾沿海地区的地域格局演变及其综合承载力评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 23;19(17):10469. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710469.
9
Integrated assessment and critical obstacle diagnosis of rural resource and environmental carrying capacity with a social-ecological framework: a case study of Liyang county, Jiangsu Province.基于社会-生态框架的农村资源环境承载力综合评价及关键障碍诊断——以江苏省溧阳县为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jun;30(30):76026-76043. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27509-w. Epub 2023 May 26.
10
Uncoordinated Coupling Assessment of New Urbanization and Ecological Carrying Capacity in the Yellow River Basin.黄河流域新型城镇化与生态承载力协调性耦合评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 25;19(15):9016. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159016.

本文引用的文献

1
GIS-based health assessment of the marine ecosystem in Laizhou Bay, China.基于 GIS 的中国莱州湾海洋生态系统健康评价
Mar Pollut Bull. 2017 Dec 15;125(1-2):242-249. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.08.027. Epub 2017 Aug 18.