Department of Occupational Health Practice and Management, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Department of Environmental Epidemiology, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 1;11:1037496. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1037496. eCollection 2023.
The Go To Travel campaign in Japan was launched to subsidize travel and accommodation costs for tourists through vouchers that could be used at domestic destinations. Infection prevention behavior can lead to refraining from travel owing to infection concerns; conversely, taking preventive action can promote travel. There is a lack of information about the association between infection prevention behaviors and desire to travel. During a pandemic of infection, there is the difficult challenge of balancing the promotion of infection prevention behavior with economic revitalization. Thus, we examined the relationship between personal infection prevention behaviors and using Go To Travel.
We conducted a cross-sectional study of 26,637 workers who responded to a large-scale questionnaire survey about COVID-19 in Japan. We built multilevel logistic regression models adjusted for confounders to assess the association between each personal infection prevention behavior and using Go To Travel. We analyzed the seven infection prevention behavior individually: wearing a mask when among other people; disinfecting hands with alcohol before going indoors; washing hands after using the toilet; gargling upon returning home; opening a window to ventilate a room; carrying an alcohol sanitizer; and disinfecting hands after touching objects outside.
Among the 26,637 participants, 7,959 (30%) used Go To Travel. For "wearing a mask in the presence of others" and "washing hands after using the toilet," the majority of respondents answered "almost always: 86.5 and 85.6% respectively. Action "carrying alcohol disinfectant" was the least implemented, with 36.9% of respondents saying "almost never." Two of the seven preventive behaviors ("disinfecting hands with alcohol before going indoors" and "carrying alcohol disinfectant") were positively related to using Go To Travel, that is, the more of these actions they took, the more they used Go To Travel ( for trend <0.001).
To balance pandemic preparedness with economic preparedness, it is also necessary to promote travel when the infection situation is calm. However, since human mobility can be a factor that exacerbates the infection situation, it is necessary to promote more infection prevention behaviors among individuals. We confirmed that Go To Travel users were basically doing a good infection prevention behaviors, but they tended not to wash their hands after touching things or carry alcohol sanitizer. It is necessary to encourage these measures to be taken when traveling.
日本推出“Go To Travel”活动,通过向国内旅游目的地提供优惠券来补贴游客的旅行和住宿费用。预防感染的行为可能会导致因感染而避免旅行;相反,采取预防措施可以促进旅行。目前缺乏有关预防感染行为与旅行意愿之间关联的信息。在感染大流行期间,平衡促进预防感染行为与经济振兴之间存在艰巨的挑战。因此,我们研究了个人预防感染行为与使用“Go To Travel”之间的关系。
我们对参与日本大规模 COVID-19 问卷调查的 26637 名工人进行了横断面研究。我们建立了多层次逻辑回归模型,调整了混杂因素,以评估七种个人感染预防行为与使用“Go To Travel”之间的关联。我们分别分析了七种感染预防行为:与他人在一起时戴口罩;进入室内前用酒精消毒双手;使用厕所后洗手;回家后漱口;打开窗户通风房间;携带酒精消毒剂;触摸室外物体后消毒双手。
在 26637 名参与者中,有 7959 人(30%)使用了“Go To Travel”。对于“与他人在一起时戴口罩”和“使用厕所后洗手”,大多数受访者回答“几乎总是”:分别为 86.5%和 85.6%。“携带酒精消毒剂”的行为实施最少,有 36.9%的受访者表示“几乎从不”。七种预防行为中的两种(“进入室内前用酒精消毒双手”和“携带酒精消毒剂”)与使用“Go To Travel”呈正相关,即采取这些措施的次数越多,使用“Go To Travel”的次数就越多(趋势<0.001)。
为了在大流行准备和经济准备之间取得平衡,在感染情况平静时也有必要促进旅行。然而,由于人员流动可能是加剧感染情况的一个因素,因此有必要在个人中促进更多的感染预防行为。我们证实,“Go To Travel”的使用者基本都在做好预防感染的行为,但他们往往不洗手或不携带酒精消毒剂。有必要鼓励在旅行时采取这些措施。