• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

六个国家 COVID-19 的公众认知、个体特征和预防行为:一项横断面研究。

Public perceptions, individual characteristics, and preventive behaviors for COVID-19 in six countries: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medical Sciences, Fujita Health University School of Medical Sciences, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, 470-1192, Japan.

Department of Economics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.

出版信息

Environ Health Prev Med. 2021 Mar 3;26(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12199-021-00952-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12199-021-00952-2
PMID:33657995
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7928175/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Public perceptions and personal characteristics are heterogeneous between countries and subgroups, which may have different impacts on health-protective behaviors during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. To assess whether self-reported perceptions of COVID-19 and personal characteristics are associated with protective behaviors among general adults and to compare patterns in six different countries.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study uses the secondary data collected through an online survey between 15 and 23 April 2020 across six countries (China, Italy, Japan, Korea, the UK, and the USA). A total of 5945 adults aged 18 years or older were eligible for our analysis. A logistic regression model was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) of three recommended behaviors (wearing a mask, handwashing, and avoiding social gatherings).

RESULTS

In most countries except for China, the participants who perceived wearing a mask as being extremely effective to curtail the pandemic were more likely to wear a mask (OR, 95%CI: Italy: 4.14, 2.08-8.02; Japan: 3.59, 1.75-7.30; Korea: 7.89, 1.91-31.63: UK: 9.23, 5.14-17.31; USA: 4.81, 2.61-8.92). Those who perceived that handwashing was extremely effective had higher ORs of this preventive behavior (OR, 95%CI: Italy: 16.39, 3.56-70.18; Japan: 12.24, 4.03-37.35; Korea: 12.41, 2.02-76.39; UK: 18.04, 2.60-152.78; USA: 10.56, 2.21-44.32). The participants who perceived avoiding social gathering as being extremely effective to curtail the pandemic were more likely to take this type of preventive behavior (OR, 95%CI: China: 3.79, 1.28-10.23; Korea: 6.18, 1.77-20.60; UK: 4.45, 1.63-11.63; USA: 4.34, 1.84-9.95). The associations between personal characteristics, living environment, psychological status, and preventive behaviors varied across different countries. Individuals who changed their behavior because of recommendations from doctors/public health officials were more likely to take preventive behaviors in many countries.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that higher perceived effectiveness may be a common factor to encourage preventive behaviors in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. These results may provide a better understanding of the homogeneity and heterogeneity of factors related to preventive behaviors and improve public health policies in various countries and groups.

摘要

背景

公众认知和个人特征在国家和亚群之间存在异质性,这可能对 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间的健康保护行为产生不同的影响。本研究旨在评估一般成年人中自我报告的 COVID-19 认知和个人特征是否与保护行为有关,并比较六个不同国家的模式。

方法

本横断面研究使用 2020 年 4 月 15 日至 23 日期间通过在线调查在六个国家(中国、意大利、日本、韩国、英国和美国)收集的二级数据。共有 5945 名 18 岁或以上的成年人符合我们的分析条件。使用逻辑回归模型估计三种推荐行为(戴口罩、洗手和避免社交聚会)的优势比(OR)和 95%置信区间(95%CI)。

结果

除中国外,在大多数国家,认为戴口罩对遏制大流行非常有效的参与者更有可能戴口罩(OR,95%CI:意大利:4.14,2.08-8.02;日本:3.59,1.75-7.30;韩国:7.89,1.91-31.63;英国:9.23,5.14-17.31;美国:4.81,2.61-8.92)。那些认为洗手非常有效的人采取这种预防措施的 OR 更高(OR,95%CI:意大利:16.39,3.56-70.18;日本:12.24,4.03-37.35;韩国:12.41,2.02-76.39;英国:18.04,2.60-152.78;美国:10.56,2.21-44.32)。那些认为避免社交聚会对遏制大流行非常有效的参与者更有可能采取这种预防行为(OR,95%CI:中国:3.79,1.28-10.23;韩国:6.18,1.77-20.60;英国:4.45,1.63-11.63;美国:4.34,1.84-9.95)。在不同国家,个人特征、生活环境、心理状态与预防行为之间的关联存在差异。由于医生/公共卫生官员的建议而改变行为的个人在许多国家更有可能采取预防措施。

结论

这些发现表明,更高的感知有效性可能是鼓励针对 COVID-19 大流行采取预防行为的共同因素。这些结果可以更好地理解与预防行为相关的因素的同质性和异质性,并改善各国和各群体的公共卫生政策。

相似文献

1
Public perceptions, individual characteristics, and preventive behaviors for COVID-19 in six countries: a cross-sectional study.六个国家 COVID-19 的公众认知、个体特征和预防行为:一项横断面研究。
Environ Health Prev Med. 2021 Mar 3;26(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12199-021-00952-2.
2
Relationship Between COVID-19 Infection and Risk Perception, Knowledge, Attitude, and Four Nonpharmaceutical Interventions During the Late Period of the COVID-19 Epidemic in China: Online Cross-Sectional Survey of 8158 Adults.中国新冠疫情后期新冠病毒感染与风险认知、知识、态度及四项非药物干预措施之间的关系:对8158名成年人的在线横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 13;22(11):e21372. doi: 10.2196/21372.
3
Effects of COVID-19 Emergency Alert Text Messages on Practicing Preventive Behaviors: Cross-sectional Web-Based Survey in South Korea.新冠疫情紧急警报短信对践行预防行为的影响:韩国基于网络的横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 25;23(2):e24165. doi: 10.2196/24165.
4
Mask use, risk-mitigation behaviours and pandemic fatigue during the COVID-19 pandemic in five cities in Australia, the UK and USA: A cross-sectional survey.在澳大利亚、英国和美国的五个城市进行的一项横断面调查显示,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,口罩使用、风险缓解行为和大流行疲劳情况。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 May;106:199-207. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.03.056. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
5
"Public Health Behaviors during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Greece and Associated Factors: A Nationwide Cross-sectional Survey".“新冠疫情期间希腊的公共卫生行为及相关因素:一项全国性横断面调查”。
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211022913. doi: 10.1177/00469580211022913.
6
Predictors of COVID-19 Preventive Perceptions and Behaviors Among Millennials: Two Cross-sectional Survey Studies.千禧一代对 COVID-19 的预防认知和行为的预测因素:两项横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 12;23(8):e30612. doi: 10.2196/30612.
7
Global adoption of personal and social mitigation behaviors during COVID-19: The role of trust & confidence.全球采纳 COVID-19 期间的个人和社会缓解行为:信任和信心的作用。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 8;16(9):e0256159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256159. eCollection 2021.
8
Association of COVID-19 Misinformation with Face Mask Wearing and Social Distancing in a Nationally Representative US Sample.在一项具有全国代表性的美国样本中,与新冠病毒错误信息相关的口罩佩戴和社交距离行为。
Health Commun. 2021 Jan;36(1):6-14. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1847437. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
9
Social Distancing and Transmission-reducing Practices during the 2019 Coronavirus Disease and 2015 Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Outbreaks in Korea.韩国 2019 年冠状病毒病和 2015 年中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒爆发期间的社交距离和降低传播实践。
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Jun 15;35(23):e220. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e220.
10
Comparison of Face-Touching Behaviors Before and During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.新冠疫情前后的面部触碰行为比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2016924. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.16924.

引用本文的文献

1
Socioeconomic disparities in risk perceptions and precautionary actions against COVID-19 among the working age population aged 18-59 in Japan: a cross-sectional study.日本18至59岁劳动年龄人口对新冠病毒的风险认知及预防措施中的社会经济差异:一项横断面研究
BMJ Public Health. 2024 Jun 2;2(1):e000181. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000181. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
[COVID-19 and the predominant groups of preventive behaviors and associated factors: semi-urban area].[新冠疫情与主要预防行为群体及相关因素:半城市地区]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2024 Jan 8;62(1):1-10. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10278092.
3
Psychological and psychosocial determinants of COVID-related handwashing behaviours: A systematic review.新冠疫情相关洗手行为的心理和社会心理决定因素:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 15;20(3):e1421. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1421. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Explaining differences in self-focused and other-involved public health preventive behaviors between the US and China: the role of self- construal and health locus of control.解释中美两国在自我关注和他人参与的公共卫生预防行为上的差异:自我建构和健康控制点的作用。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 22;12:1321506. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1321506. eCollection 2024.
5
Association between area deprivation index and concerns to COVID-19: A multi-level analysis of individual and area factors.地区贫困指数与对新冠病毒病的担忧之间的关联:个体因素与地区因素的多层次分析
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Dec 24;25:101580. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101580. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Longitudinal relationship between quality of life and negative life events among adolescents during COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-lagged panel analysis.新冠疫情期间青少年生活质量与负性生活事件的纵向关系:交叉滞后面板分析。
Environ Health Prev Med. 2023;28:67. doi: 10.1265/ehpm.22-00284.
7
Determinants of the mental health status of university students in Japan: comparison between pandemic and recession periods during the 7th wave of COVID-19.日本大学生心理健康状况的决定因素:新冠疫情第七波期间大流行与衰退期的比较
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 10;14:1221333. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1221333. eCollection 2023.
8
Compliance Trajectory and Patterns of COVID-19 Preventive Measures, Japan, 2020-2022.2020-2022 年日本 COVID-19 预防措施的遵守轨迹和模式。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2023 Sep;29(9):1747-1756. doi: 10.3201/eid2909.221754. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
9
Beta-negative binomial nonlinear spatio-temporal random effects modeling of COVID-19 case counts in Japan.日本新冠肺炎病例数的β负二项式非线性时空随机效应建模
J Appl Stat. 2022 Apr 24;50(7):1650-1663. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2022.2064439. eCollection 2023.
10
Behavioural Sciences Contribution to Suppressing Transmission of Covid-19 in the UK: A Systematic Literature Review.行为科学对英国 COVID-19 传播的抑制作用:系统文献综述。
Int J Behav Med. 2024 Feb;31(1):1-18. doi: 10.1007/s12529-023-10171-4. Epub 2023 Apr 14.

本文引用的文献

1
The challenges of modeling and forecasting the spread of COVID-19.新冠病毒传播建模和预测面临的挑战。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 21;117(29):16732-16738. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2006520117. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
2
Relationships Between Initial COVID-19 Risk Perceptions and Protective Health Behaviors: A National Survey.新冠病毒初期风险感知与防护健康行为的关系:一项全国性调查。
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Aug;59(2):157-167. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.05.001. Epub 2020 May 22.
3
Effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 cases, deaths, and demand for hospital services in the UK: a modelling study.非药物干预对英国 COVID-19 病例、死亡和医院服务需求的影响:一项建模研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Jul;5(7):e375-e385. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30133-X. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
4
Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.物理隔离、口罩和眼部防护预防 SARS-CoV-2 和 COVID-19 的人际传播:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2020 Jun 27;395(10242):1973-1987. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
5
Modelling the COVID-19 epidemic and implementation of population-wide interventions in Italy.对意大利 COVID-19 疫情的建模与全民干预措施的实施。
Nat Med. 2020 Jun;26(6):855-860. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0883-7. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
6
Impact assessment of non-pharmaceutical interventions against coronavirus disease 2019 and influenza in Hong Kong: an observational study.非药物干预措施对 2019 年冠状病毒病和流感在香港的影响评估:一项观察性研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 May;5(5):e279-e288. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30090-6. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
7
Projecting the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 through the postpandemic period.预测 SARS-CoV-2 的传播动力学,直至大流行后期。
Science. 2020 May 22;368(6493):860-868. doi: 10.1126/science.abb5793. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
8
Association of Public Health Interventions With the Epidemiology of the COVID-19 Outbreak in Wuhan, China.公共卫生干预措施与中国武汉 COVID-19 疫情流行病学的关联。
JAMA. 2020 May 19;323(19):1915-1923. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6130.
9
Awareness, Attitudes, and Actions Related to COVID-19 Among Adults With Chronic Conditions at the Onset of the U.S. Outbreak: A Cross-sectional Survey.美国疫情暴发初期慢性病成人对 COVID-19 的认知、态度和行为:一项横断面调查。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jul 21;173(2):100-109. doi: 10.7326/M20-1239. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
10
Preliminary Estimates of the Prevalence of Selected Underlying Health Conditions Among Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 - United States, February 12-March 28, 2020.2019 年冠状病毒病患者中某些基础健康状况的初步估计——美国,2020 年 2 月 12 日至 3 月 28 日。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Apr 3;69(13):382-386. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6913e2.