Campbell Hope E, Abdul-Mutakabbir Jacinda C, Hodge David Augustin
Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Belmont University College of Pharmacy, 1900 Belmont Blvd, MCWH #330, Nashville, TN 37212, Office: (615)-460-6530, Email:
Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice| Critical Care-Infectious Diseases Pharmacist, Loma Linda University | School of Pharmacy, Loma Linda University Medical Center |East Campus, 24745 Stewart Street, Shryock Hall Room 212, Loma Linda, California 92350, Office Phone Number: (909)-651-9221, Email:
J Healthc Sci Humanit. 2021 Fall;11(1):107-121.
With 118,000 cases in 114 countries and 4291 global mortalities, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 a pandemic on March 11, 2020. The origins were believed to be from Wuhan, China, and SARS CoV-2, a coronavirus, was quickly identified as the causative organism. Researchers at the National Institute of Health Vaccine Research Center identified the spike protein as the critical portion of the virus that allows for attachment to human cells. In just 66 days after identifying the genetic sequence, the first COVID-19 vaccine candidate began the enrollment of human subjects into a Phase I clinical trial. This accelerated effort was due to a collective and collaborative global response. Currently, one COVID-19 vaccine has been approved and two others have received an emergency use authorization (EUA) from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Thus, there has been a clear comparison of the COVID-19 response efforts and that which was utilized in addressing the human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) epidemic. For over four decades, the HIV/AIDS epidemic has been historically defined by a disproportionate number of infections and related mortalities amongst racially and ethnically minoritized individuals, including those that identify as homosexual. While novel drug therapies have been developed for the treatment of HIV/AIDS; there have been key components employed amid the global health response to COVID-19, that have been absent from the management of the HIV/AIDS epidemic. Majorly, the development and availability of vaccine against HIV/AIDS. Many of the ideas and initiatives that have resulted in a positive COVID-19 response and the eventual successful vaccination development; have been those learned from the trial and error of mitigating increasing global rates of HIV/AIDS infections. Hence, the question remains as to whether the lessons and approaches learned during the COVID-19 pandemic, namely vaccination development, will be applied to managing the HIV/AIDS epidemic. Herein, we aim to compare the HIV/AIDS epidemic and COVID-19 pandemic, by describing how the fight against HIV/AIDs equipped global scientific leaders with effective strategies to overcome future public health crises (COVID-19), discuss the ethical considerations associated with the differences in the global health responses to the HIV/ AIDS epidemic versus the COVID-19 pandemic, and finally, identify lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic that can be applied to the quest for an HIV/AIDS vaccine..
2020年3月11日,世界卫生组织(WHO)宣布新冠疫情为全球大流行,当时已有114个国家报告了11.8万例病例,全球死亡4291人。普遍认为新冠病毒起源于中国武汉,一种名为严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的冠状病毒很快被确定为病原体。美国国立卫生研究院疫苗研究中心的研究人员确定,刺突蛋白是病毒附着人体细胞的关键部分。在确定病毒基因序列后的短短66天内,首个新冠疫苗候选产品就开始招募人体受试者进入I期临床试验。这一加速进展得益于全球的集体合作。目前,已有一种新冠疫苗获批,另外两种获得了美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的紧急使用授权(EUA)。因此,新冠疫情应对措施与应对人类免疫缺陷病毒/获得性免疫缺陷综合征综合征(HIV/AIDS)疫情的措施形成了鲜明对比。四十多年来,HIV/AIDS疫情的一个历史特征是,在包括同性恋者在内的少数族裔和种族群体中,感染及相关死亡人数不成比例。虽然已经开发出了治疗HIV/AIDS的新型药物疗法,但在全球应对新冠疫情中采用的一些关键措施,在HIV/AIDS疫情防控中却未曾出现。主要是针对HIV/AIDS的疫苗的研发和供应。许多带来新冠疫情积极应对效果并最终成功研发出疫苗的理念和举措,都来自于减缓全球HIV/AIDS感染率上升的反复试验。因此,新冠疫情期间学到的经验教训,即疫苗研发,是否会应用于HIV/AIDS疫情防控,仍是一个问题。在此,我们旨在比较HIV/AIDS疫情和新冠疫情,描述抗击HIV/AIDS如何让全球科学领军人物掌握有效策略以应对未来公共卫生危机(新冠疫情),讨论全球应对HIV/AIDS疫情和新冠疫情的差异所涉及的伦理考量,最后,找出新冠疫情的经验教训,以便应用于寻求HIV/AIDS疫苗的工作中。