Chen Yuling, Wang Jianming
School of Environmental and Resources Science, Zhejiang A & F University, Hangzhou, China.
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Dali University, Dali, Yunnan, China.
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Feb 3;14:1093905. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1093905. eCollection 2023.
Accurate information concerning crown profile is critical in analyzing biological processes and providing a more accurate estimate of carbon balance, which is conducive to sustainable forest management and planning. The similarities between the types of data addressed with LSTM algorithms and crown profile data make a compelling argument for the integration of deep learning into the crown profile modeling. Thus, the aim was to study the application of deep learning method LSTM and its variant algorithms in the crown profile modeling, using the crown profile database from secondary forests in Yunnan province, in southwest China. Furthermore, the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) was used to interpret the predictions of ensemble or deep learning models. The results showed that LSTM's variant algorithms was competitive with traditional Vanila LSTM, but substantially outperformed ensemble learning model LightGBM. Specifically, the proposed Hybrid LSTM-LightGBM and Integrated LSTM-LightGBM have achieved a best forecasting performance on training set and testing set respectively. Furthermore, the feature importance analysis of LightGBM and Vanila LSTM presented that there were more factors that contribute significantly to Vanila LSTM model compared to LightGBM model. This phenomenon can explain why deep learning outperforms ensemble learning when there are more interrelated features.
准确的树冠轮廓信息对于分析生物过程和更准确地估计碳平衡至关重要,这有助于可持续森林管理和规划。长短期记忆(LSTM)算法处理的数据类型与树冠轮廓数据之间的相似性,有力地支持了将深度学习集成到树冠轮廓建模中。因此,本研究旨在利用中国西南部云南省次生林的树冠轮廓数据库,探讨深度学习方法LSTM及其变体算法在树冠轮廓建模中的应用。此外,使用SHAP(SHapley值加法解释)来解释集成模型或深度学习模型的预测结果。结果表明,LSTM的变体算法与传统的香草LSTM具有竞争力,但显著优于集成学习模型LightGBM。具体而言,所提出的混合LSTM-LightGBM和集成LSTM-LightGBM分别在训练集和测试集上取得了最佳预测性能。此外,LightGBM和香草LSTM的特征重要性分析表明,与LightGBM模型相比,有更多因素对香草LSTM模型有显著贡献。这种现象可以解释为什么在存在更多相互关联特征时,深度学习优于集成学习。