Division of General Internal Medicine and Center for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, US.
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Feb 6;89(1):9. doi: 10.5334/aogh.3961. eCollection 2023.
"Decolonizing global health" (DGH) may help global health trainees understand and remediate the effects of historical colonialism on global health, but little is known regarding how trainees perceive DGH. Understanding their perspectives is critical for designing educational interventions tailored to their needs.
To understand how trainees perceive DGH research and to determine if perspectives differ between trainees from high- (HICs) versus low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
An online survey of all 2017-2022 pre-doctoral and post-doctoral trainees (n = 111) and mentors (n = 91) within a multi-university program that supports US and international investigators in one-year mentored global health research. The survey evaluated individuals' self-reported knowledge and attitudes toward DGH and their perceptions of historical colonialism's impact on eight aspects of global health.
The response rate to trainee surveys was 56%. Trainees from LMICs were less aware of the concept of DGH; 5/25 (20%) had never heard of DGH and 16/25 (64%) reported that they "know a little," whereas all HIC trainees had heard of DGH and 29/36 (81%) reported that they "know a little" (p = 0.019). For three aspects of global health (i.e., which research questions get asked; development of collaborative relationships; and data/statistical analyses), trainees from LMICs were more likely to report positive effects of colonialism. However, in open-ended responses, no thematic differences existed between how LMIC and HIC trainees defined DGH (i.e., actively eliminating power imbalances; prioritizing local needs; promoting local leadership; providing equitable opportunities; and ensuring programs are culturally appropriate).
Different perspectives surrounding what DGH means suggest a shared understanding may be needed and is arguably prerequisite to designing educational interventions to help global health trainees recognize, understand, and act in global health. Future research is needed to understand perspectives on decolonization across diverse contexts with attention to constructs such as race, ethnicity, and gender.
“去殖民化全球健康”(DGH)可以帮助全球健康领域的受训者了解和纠正历史殖民主义对全球健康的影响,但对于受训者如何看待 DGH,我们知之甚少。了解他们的观点对于设计针对他们需求的教育干预措施至关重要。
了解受训者对 DGH 研究的看法,并确定来自高收入国家(HICs)与低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的受训者之间的观点是否存在差异。
对支持美国和国际研究人员进行为期一年的全球健康研究的多所大学计划中的所有 2017-2022 年的博士前和博士后受训者(n=111)和导师(n=91)进行在线调查。该调查评估了个人对 DGH 的自我报告的知识和态度,以及他们对历史殖民主义对全球健康的八个方面的影响的看法。
对受训者进行调查的回复率为 56%。来自 LMICs 的受训者对 DGH 的概念了解较少;25 名中有 5 名(20%)从未听说过 DGH,而 25 名中有 16 名(64%)表示“略知一二”,而所有 HIC 的受训者都听说过 DGH,而 36 名中有 29 名(81%)表示“略知一二”(p=0.019)。对于全球健康的三个方面(即提出哪些研究问题;建立合作关系;以及数据/统计分析),来自 LMICs 的受训者更有可能报告殖民主义的积极影响。然而,在开放式回复中,来自 LMIC 和 HIC 的受训者对 DGH 的定义并没有表现出主题上的差异(即积极消除权力失衡;优先考虑当地需求;促进当地领导;提供公平机会;并确保项目具有文化适宜性)。
围绕 DGH 含义的不同观点表明,可能需要建立共同的理解,这可以说是设计教育干预措施以帮助全球健康领域的受训者认识、理解和参与全球健康的前提。需要进一步研究不同背景下的去殖民化观点,关注种族、民族和性别等构建。