去殖民化全球健康运动中的著作权是否被殖民化了?
Has Authorship in the Decolonizing Global Health Movement Been Colonized?
机构信息
Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
出版信息
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Jun 20;89(1):42. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4146. eCollection 2023.
BACKGROUND
Decolonization in global health is a recent movement aimed at relinquishing remnants of supremacist mindsets, inequitable structures, and power differentials in global health.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the author demographics of publications on decolonizing global health and global health partnerships between low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and high-income countries (HICs).
METHODS
We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of publications related to decolonizing global health and global health partnerships from the inception of the selected journal databases (i.e., Medline, CAB Global Health, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science) to November 14, 2022. Author country affiliations were assigned as listed in each publication. Author gender was assigned using author first name and the software genderize.io. Descriptive statistics were used for author country income bracket, gender, and distribution.
FINDINGS
Among 197 publications on decolonizing global health and global health partnerships, there were 691 total authors (median 2 authors per publication, interquartile range 1, 4). Publications with author bylines comprised exclusively of authors affiliated with HICs were most common (70.0%, n = 138) followed by those with authors affiliated both with HICs and LMICs (22.3%, n = 44). Only 7.6% (n = 15) of publications had author bylines comprised exclusively of authors affiliated with LMICs. Over half (54.0%, n = 373) of the included authors had names that were female and female authors affiliated with HICs most commonly occupied first author positions (51.8%, n = 102).
CONCLUSIONS
Authors in publications on decolonizing global health and global health partnerships have largely been comprised of individuals affiliated with HICs. There was a marked paucity of publications with authors affiliated with LMICs, whose voices provide context and crucial insight into the needs of the decolonizing global health movement.
背景
全球健康领域的去殖民化是一场旨在放弃全球健康领域中至上主义思维、不平等结构和权力差异残余的最新运动。
目的
确定关于去殖民化全球健康和中低收入国家(LMICs)与高收入国家(HICs)之间全球卫生伙伴关系的出版物的作者人口统计学特征。
方法
我们对从选定期刊数据库(即 Medline、CAB 全球健康、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 Web of Science)创建到 2022 年 11 月 14 日期间发表的与去殖民化全球健康和全球卫生伙伴关系相关的出版物进行了横断面分析。根据每个出版物中的列表,为作者的国家归属分配作者国家归属。使用作者的名字和软件 genderize.io 为作者的性别分配。使用描述性统计数据对作者的国家收入阶层、性别和分布进行分析。
结果
在 197 篇关于去殖民化全球健康和全球卫生伙伴关系的出版物中,共有 691 位作者(中位数为每篇出版物 2 位作者,四分位距为 1,4)。作者名单仅由 HIC 附属作者组成的出版物最为常见(70.0%,n=138),其次是 HIC 和 LMIC 附属作者都有的出版物(22.3%,n=44)。只有 7.6%(n=15)的出版物作者名单仅由 LMIC 附属作者组成。在纳入的作者中,有一半以上(54.0%,n=373)的名字是女性,而 HIC 附属的女性作者最常担任第一作者(51.8%,n=102)。
结论
去殖民化全球健康和全球卫生伙伴关系出版物的作者主要由 HIC 附属人员组成。与 LMIC 附属作者的出版物明显缺乏,而这些作者的声音为去殖民化全球健康运动的需求提供了背景和重要的见解。