Suppr超能文献

口服益生菌、益生元和合生元干预措施作为非老年成年人胃肠道感染的对策:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Orally Ingested Probiotic, Prebiotic, and Synbiotic Interventions as Countermeasures for Gastrointestinal Tract Infections in Nonelderly Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA, United States.

Naval Medical Research Center, Silver Spring, MD, United States; Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, United States.

出版信息

Adv Nutr. 2023 May;14(3):539-554. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.02.002. Epub 2023 Feb 22.

Abstract

Meta-analyses have not examined the prophylactic use of orally ingested probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics for preventing gastrointestinal tract infections (GTIs) of various etiologies in adult populations, despite evidence that these gut microbiota-targeted interventions can be effective in treating certain GTIs. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the effects of prophylactic use of orally ingested probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on GTI incidence, duration, and severity in nonelderly, nonhospitalized adults. CENTRAL, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through January 2022. English-language, peer-reviewed publications of randomized, placebo-controlled studies testing an orally ingested probiotic, prebiotic, or synbiotic intervention of any dose for ≥1 wk in adults who were not hospitalized, immunosuppressed, or taking antibiotics were included. Results were analyzed using random-effects meta-analyses of intention-to-treat (ITT) and complete case (CC) cohorts. Heterogeneity was explored by subgroup meta-analysis and meta-regression. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias 2 tool. Seventeen publications reporting 20 studies of probiotics (n = 16), prebiotics (n = 3), and synbiotics (n = 1) were identified (n > 6994 subjects). In CC and ITT analyses, risk of experiencing ≥1 GTI was reduced with probiotics (CC analysis-risk ratio: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.73, 1.01) and prebiotics (risk ratio: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.66, 0.98). No effects on GTI duration or severity were observed. Sources of heterogeneity included the study population and number of probiotic strains administered but were often unexplained, and a high risk of bias was observed for most studies. The specific effects of individual probiotic strains and prebiotic types could not be assessed owing to a lack of confirmatory studies. Findings indicated that both orally ingested probiotics and prebiotics, relative to placebo, demonstrated modest benefit for reducing GTI risk in nonelderly adults. However, results should be interpreted cautiously owing to the low number of studies, high risk of bias, and unexplained heterogeneity that may include probiotic strain-specific or prebiotic-specific effects. This review was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42020200670.

摘要

荟萃分析尚未研究口服摄入益生菌、益生元和合生菌预防各种病因引起的成人胃肠道感染(GTIs)的预防性作用,尽管有证据表明这些肠道微生物靶向干预措施可有效治疗某些 GTIs。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在估计非老年、非住院成人口服摄入益生菌、益生元和合生菌对 GTI 发生率、持续时间和严重程度的影响。通过 2022 年 1 月检索 CENTRAL、PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science,纳入了英文同行评审的随机、安慰剂对照研究,这些研究测试了口服摄入益生菌、益生元或合生菌干预的任何剂量,持续时间≥1 周,且研究对象是非住院、免疫抑制或服用抗生素的成年人。使用意向治疗(ITT)和完全案例(CC)队列的随机效应荟萃分析来分析结果。通过亚组荟萃分析和荟萃回归探索异质性。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险 2 工具评估风险。共确定了 17 项发表的研究报告了 20 项益生菌(n=16)、益生元(n=3)和合生菌(n=1)的研究(n>6994 例)。在 CC 和 ITT 分析中,益生菌(CC 分析风险比:0.86;95%CI:0.73,1.01)和益生元(风险比:0.80;95%CI:0.66,0.98)降低了发生≥1 次 GTI 的风险。未观察到对 GTI 持续时间或严重程度的影响。异质性的来源包括研究人群和给予的益生菌菌株数量,但往往无法解释,并且大多数研究存在高偏倚风险。由于缺乏确认性研究,无法评估单个益生菌菌株和益生元类型的具体作用。研究结果表明,与安慰剂相比,口服摄入益生菌和益生元对降低非老年成年人 GTI 风险具有一定益处。但是,由于研究数量少、偏倚风险高以及无法解释的异质性,包括益生菌菌株特异性或益生元特异性效应,结果应谨慎解释。本综述在 PROSPERO 注册为 CRD42020200670。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a596/10201658/41dc5af62c1b/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验