• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神科护士临床能力评估工具的心理测量特性:文献系统评价

Psychometric properties of clinical competency assessment instruments for psychiatric nurses: A systematic review of literature.

作者信息

Sheikhbahaeddinzadeh Effat, Ashktorab Tahereh, Ebadi Abbas

机构信息

Department of Nursing Management, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran Medical Science Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Life Style Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Dec 28;11:396. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1779_21. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1779_21
PMID:36824079
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9942164/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Facilitating the healing process of patients with psychiatric disorders depends on high-quality mental health care and expert psychiatric nurses. A valid tool is required to objectively evaluate the quality of performance and competency of psychiatric nurses. This systematic review aimed to investigate and critique the psychometric properties of some psychiatric nursing clinical competency assessment instruments with Consensus-based standards for the selection of health status measurement instruments (COSMIN) checklist and according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To retrieve published articles using Persian and English keywords "psychiatric nursing," "competence," "competency," "tool," "checklist," "scale," "questionnaire," "psychiatric mental health nurse," were searched in databases without time limitation. Then, psychometric properties of selected instruments were evaluated using the COSMIN checklist and reported according to the PRISMA statement.

RESULTS

Most of these tools did not entirely and desirably report psychometric properties. It is not designed as a special tool for postgraduate psychiatric nursing.

CONCLUSION

The methodology of existing instruments does not meet the COSMIN checklist criteria; therefore it needs to develop. To assess the competency of psychiatric nursing postgraduate, a tool tailored to the cultural and social context and with acceptable psychometric properties is necessary.

摘要

背景

促进精神疾病患者的康复过程依赖于高质量的精神卫生保健和专业的精神科护士。需要一种有效的工具来客观评估精神科护士的工作质量和能力。本系统评价旨在根据基于共识的健康状况测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)清单以及系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA),调查和评判一些精神科护理临床能力评估工具的心理测量特性。

材料与方法

为检索已发表的文章,在数据库中使用波斯语和英语关键词“精神科护理”、“能力”、“胜任力”、“工具”、“清单”、“量表”、“问卷”、“精神科心理健康护士”进行不限时间的搜索。然后,使用COSMIN清单评估所选工具的心理测量特性,并根据PRISMA声明进行报告。

结果

这些工具大多未完全且理想地报告心理测量特性。它并非专门为精神科护理研究生设计的工具。

结论

现有工具的方法不符合COSMIN清单标准;因此需要开发。为评估精神科护理研究生的能力,需要一种适合文化和社会背景且具有可接受心理测量特性的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3a4/9942164/f34fb705919e/JEHP-11-396-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3a4/9942164/f34fb705919e/JEHP-11-396-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3a4/9942164/f34fb705919e/JEHP-11-396-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of clinical competency assessment instruments for psychiatric nurses: A systematic review of literature.精神科护士临床能力评估工具的心理测量特性:文献系统评价
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Dec 28;11:396. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1779_21. eCollection 2022.
2
Psychometric properties of instruments used to measure the informatics competence of nurses: A systematic review.测量护士信息学能力的工具的心理计量学特性:系统评价。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 Aug;79:104070. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104070. Epub 2024 Jul 13.
3
Development of Postgraduate Psychiatric Nursing Students' Clinical Competency Questionnaire.研究生精神科护理学生临床能力问卷的编制
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2023 Oct;11(4):240-251. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2023.98879.1814.
4
Psychometric properties of instruments used to measure the cultural competence of nurses: A systematic review.测量护士文化能力的工具的心理测量学特性:系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Jan;113:103789. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103789. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
5
Instruments evaluating the self-directed learning abilities among nursing students and nurses: a systematic review of psychometric properties.评估护生和护士自主学习能力的工具:心理测量学特性的系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Nov 25;17(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1072-3.
6
A hybrid systematic narrative review of instruments measuring home-based care nurses' competency.一种混合系统的叙述性综述,评估用于测量家庭护理护士能力的工具。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Jul;80(7):2647-2671. doi: 10.1111/jan.15904. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
7
Psychometric Properties of Disaster Preparedness Tools in Nurses: A Systematic Literature Review.护士灾难准备工具的心理测量学特性:系统文献回顾。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2022 Aug;37(4):509-514. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X22000930. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
8
Evaluating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for bladder cancer: a systematic review using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.评估膀胱癌患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs):使用共识基础的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)清单进行的系统评价。
BJU Int. 2018 Nov;122(5):760-773. doi: 10.1111/bju.14368. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
9
Measurement properties of scales assessing new graduate nurses' clinical competence: A systematic review of psychometric properties.评估新毕业护士临床能力的量表的测量特性:心理测量特性的系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Oct;110:103734. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103734. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
10
The dietary knowledge measurement instruments in diabetes: A systematic psychometric review.糖尿病饮食知识测量工具:系统心理测量学评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Jun;77(6):2595-2622. doi: 10.1111/jan.14762. Epub 2021 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures in assessing knee osteoarthritis in the Chinese population: A systematic review.患者报告结局指标在中国人群中评估膝骨关节炎的信度和效度:一项系统评价
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 2;10(18):e36645. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36645. eCollection 2024 Sep 30.

本文引用的文献

1
COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study.COSMIN 偏倚风险工具评估结局测量工具可靠性或测量误差研究的质量:德尔菲研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Dec 3;20(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01179-5.
2
The effect of gender role orientation on student nurses' caring behaviour and critical thinking.性别角色取向对护生关爱行为和批判性思维的影响。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Jan;89:18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
3
Nursing Competency: Definition, Structure and Development.
护理胜任力:定义、结构与发展
Yonago Acta Med. 2018 Mar 28;61(1):1-7. doi: 10.33160/yam.2018.03.001. eCollection 2018 Mar.
4
COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study.COSMIN 方法学用于评估患者报告结局测量的内容效度:一项德尔菲研究。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1159-1170. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
5
Development of a Questionnaire to Assess Nursing Competencies for the Care of People with Psychiatric Disabilities in a Hospital Environment.开发一种评估医院环境中精神残疾患者护理能力的问卷。
Psychiatr Q. 2018 Sep;89(3):699-706. doi: 10.1007/s11126-018-9567-6.
6
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures.COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价指南。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
7
COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价偏倚风险清单。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1171-1179. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
8
The Development and Psychometric Testing on Psychiatric Nurses of a Nurse Case Management Competence Scale in Taiwan.台湾地区精神科护理人员个案管理能力量表的编制与心理计量学测试。
J Nurs Res. 2018 Apr;26(2):72-79. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000230.
9
Development and psychometric properties rating scale of "clinical competency evaluation in mental health nurses": Exploratory factor analysis.《精神科护士临床能力评价量表》的编制及心理测量学特性:探索性因素分析
Electron Physician. 2017 Apr 25;9(4):4155-4161. doi: 10.19082/4155. eCollection 2017 Apr.
10
Child-Report Measures of Occupational Performance: A Systematic Review.儿童职业表现的自评测量:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 25;11(1):e0147751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147751. eCollection 2016.