Suchomel Timothy J, McKeever Shana M, Sijuwade Olusegun, Carpenter Logan
Department of Human Movement Sciences, Carroll University, Waukesha, WI 53186, USA.
Divine Savior Holy Angels High School, Milwaukee, WI 53222, USA.
Sports (Basel). 2023 Feb 9;11(2):44. doi: 10.3390/sports11020044.
The purpose of this study was to compare the propulsion phase characteristics of the jump squat (JS), hexagonal barbell jump (HEXJ), and jump shrug (JShrug) performed across a spectrum of relative loads. Thirteen resistance-trained women (18-23 years old) performed JS, HEXJ, and JShrug repetitions at body mass (BM) or with 20, 40, 60, 80, or 100% BM during three separate testing sessions. Propulsion mean force (MF), duration (Dur), peak power output (PP), force at PP (F), and velocity at PP (V) were compared between exercises and loads using a series of 3 × 6 repeated measures ANOVA and Hedge's effect sizes. There were no significant differences in MF or Dur between exercises. While load-averaged HEXJ and JShrug PP were significantly greater than the JS, there were no significant differences between exercises at any individual load. The JShrug produced significantly greater F than the JS and HEXJ at loads ranging from BM-60% BM, but not at 80 or 100% BM. Load-averaged V produced during the JS and HEXJ was significantly greater than the JShrug; however, there were no significant differences between exercises at any individual load. Practically meaningful differences between exercises indicated that the JShrug produced greater magnitudes of force during shorter durations compared to the JS and HEXJ at light loads (BM-40%). The JS and HEXJ may be classified as more velocity-dominant exercises while the JShrug may be more force-dominant. Thus, it is important to consider the context in which each exercise is prescribed for resistance-trained women to provide an effective training stimulus.
本研究的目的是比较在一系列相对负荷下进行的深蹲跳(JS)、六角杠铃跳(HEXJ)和耸肩跳(JShrug)的蹬伸阶段特征。13名经过抗阻训练的女性(18 - 23岁)在三个单独的测试环节中,以体重(BM)或体重的20%、40%、60%、80%或100%进行JS、HEXJ和JShrug动作。使用一系列3×6重复测量方差分析和赫奇斯效应量,对不同练习和负荷之间的蹬伸平均力(MF)、持续时间(Dur)、峰值功率输出(PP)、PP时的力(F)和PP时的速度(V)进行比较。不同练习之间的MF或Dur没有显著差异。虽然负荷平均的HEXJ和JShrug的PP显著大于JS,但在任何单个负荷下不同练习之间没有显著差异。在体重至60%体重的负荷范围内,JShrug产生的F显著大于JS和HEXJ,但在80%或100%体重时并非如此。JS和HEXJ期间产生的负荷平均V显著大于JShrug;然而,在任何单个负荷下不同练习之间没有显著差异。不同练习之间具有实际意义的差异表明,在轻负荷(体重 - 40%)下,与JS和HEXJ相比,JShrug在更短的持续时间内产生更大的力。JS和HEXJ可能被归类为更以速度为主导的练习,而JShrug可能更以力量为主导。因此,对于经过抗阻训练的女性,在规定每项练习时考虑其背景以提供有效的训练刺激非常重要。