Suchomel Timothy J, Taber Christopher B, Sole Christopher J, Stone Michael H
Department of Human Movement Sciences, Carroll University, Waukesha, WI 53186, USA.
Department of Exercise Science, Sacred Heart University, Fairfield, CT 06825, USA.
Sports (Basel). 2018 Aug 12;6(3):79. doi: 10.3390/sports6030079.
The purpose of this study was to examine the force-time differences between concentric-only half-squats (COHS) performed with ballistic (BAL) or non-ballistic (NBAL) intent across a range of loads. Eighteen resistance-trained men performed either BAL or NBAL COHS at 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% of their one repetition maximum (1RM) COHS. Relative peak force (PF) and relative impulse from 0⁻50 ms (Imp50), 0⁻90 ms (Imp90), 0⁻200 ms (Imp200), and 0⁻250 ms (Imp250) were compared using a series of 2 × 4 (intent × load) repeated measures ANOVAs with Bonferroni post hoc tests. Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated to provide measures of practical significance between the BAL and NBAL COHS and each load. BAL COHS produced statistically greater PF than NBAL COHS at 30% (d = 3.37), 50% (d = 2.88), 70% (d = 2.29), and 90% 1RM (d = 1.19) (all < 0.001). Statistically significant main effect differences were found between load-averaged BAL and NBAL COHS for Imp90 ( = 0.006, d = 0.25), Imp200 ( = 0.001, d = 0.36), and Imp250 ( < 0.001, d = 0.41), but not for Imp50 ( = 0.018, d = 0.21). Considering the greater PF and impulse observed during the BAL condition, performing COHS with BAL intent may provide a favorable training stimulus compared to COHS performed with NBAL intent.
本研究的目的是检验在一系列负荷下,以弹道式(BAL)或非弹道式(NBAL)意图进行的单纯向心半蹲(COHS)之间的力-时间差异。18名经过阻力训练的男性以其一次重复最大值(1RM)COHS的30%、50%、70%和90%进行BAL或NBAL COHS。使用一系列2×4(意图×负荷)重复测量方差分析及Bonferroni事后检验,比较相对峰值力(PF)以及0至50毫秒(Imp50)、0至90毫秒(Imp90)、0至200毫秒(Imp200)和0至250毫秒(Imp250)的相对冲量。计算科恩d效应量,以衡量BAL和NBAL COHS以及各负荷之间的实际显著差异。在30%(d = 3.37)、50%(d = 2.88)、70%(d = 2.29)和90% 1RM(d = 1.19)时,BAL COHS产生的PF在统计学上显著高于NBAL COHS(均P < 0.001)。在Imp90(P = 0.006,d = 0.25)、Imp200(P = 0.001,d = 0.36)和Imp250(P < 0.001,d = 0.41)方面,发现负荷平均的BAL和NBAL COHS之间存在统计学上的显著主效应差异,但在Imp50方面不存在(P = 0.018,d = 0.21)。考虑到在BAL条件下观察到更大的PF和冲量,与以NBAL意图进行的COHS相比,以BAL意图进行COHS可能提供更有利的训练刺激。