Cormie Prue, McCaulley Grant O, McBride Jeffrey M
Neuromuscular Laboratory, Department of Health, Leisure and Exercise Science, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC 28607, USA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Jun;39(6):996-1003. doi: 10.1097/mss.0b013e3180408e0c.
The purpose of this investigation was to compare the impact of power training and strength-power training on the load-power relationship in the jump squat.
Twenty-six recreationally trained male subjects were randomly assigned to either a power training group (P; N=10), a strength-power training group (SP; N=8), or a control group (C; N=8). The P group trained for 12 wk, performing seven sets of six jump squats with the optimal load for maximal power output (body mass only, no external load), whereas the SP group performed five sets of six jump squats with the optimal load for maximal power output (body mass only, no external load) and three sets of three squats with 90% of their one-repetition maximum (1RM). Work performed by the P and SP subjects was equivalent throughout the 12 wk of training. Peak power relative to body mass (PP), jump height (JH), peak force relative to body mass (PF), and peak velocity (PV) during the jump squat were examined across loads of body mass (BM) and 20, 40, 60, and 80 kg at week 0 (baseline) and after weeks 6 (midtest) and 12 (posttest).
After training, the P group significantly increased PP at BM and 20 kg, whereas the SP group significantly increased PP output across all loading conditions. Similarly, jump height was significantly increased by the P group at the lighter loads (BM, 20 kg, and 40 kg) and by the SP group at all loads. Whereas significant improvements in maximal power output and jump height at BM were observed in both P and SP groups, no difference in maximal power output or maximal jump height existed between the training groups.
Combined lower-body strength-power training is effective as power training for improving maximum jump height and maximum power output in the jump squat, and it is more effective than power training at producing all-around (i.e., from BM to 80 kg) improvements in the load-power relationship of the jump squat.
本研究旨在比较力量训练和力量 - 功率训练对深蹲跳中负荷 - 功率关系的影响。
26名接受过休闲训练的男性受试者被随机分为力量训练组(P组;N = 10)、力量 - 功率训练组(SP组;N = 8)或对照组(C组;N = 8)。P组训练12周,以最大功率输出的最佳负荷(仅体重,无外部负荷)进行七组,每组六个深蹲跳,而SP组以最大功率输出的最佳负荷(仅体重,无外部负荷)进行五组,每组六个深蹲跳,并以其一次重复最大值(1RM)的90%进行三组,每组三个深蹲。在为期12周的训练中,P组和SP组受试者完成的工作量相当。在第0周(基线)、第6周(中期测试)和第12周(后期测试),对体重(BM)以及20、40、60和80千克负荷下的深蹲跳过程中相对于体重的峰值功率(PP)、跳跃高度(JH)、相对于体重的峰值力(PF)和峰值速度(PV)进行检测。
训练后,P组在体重和20千克负荷下的PP显著增加,而SP组在所有负荷条件下的PP输出均显著增加。同样,P组在较轻负荷(体重、20千克和40千克)下跳跃高度显著增加,SP组在所有负荷下跳跃高度显著增加。虽然P组和SP组在体重下的最大功率输出和跳跃高度均有显著改善,但训练组之间在最大功率输出或最大跳跃高度方面没有差异。
下肢力量 - 功率联合训练在提高深蹲跳的最大跳跃高度和最大功率输出方面与力量训练同样有效,并且在改善深蹲跳的负荷 - 功率关系(即从体重到80千克)方面比力量训练更有效。