• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双侧血流限制的高强度深蹲后的急性反应。

Acute Responses to High-Intensity Back Squats with Bilateral Blood Flow Restriction.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.

Department of Kinesiology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 17;20(4):3555. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043555.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20043555
PMID:36834246
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9959773/
Abstract

This study examined the acute effects of high-intensity resistance exercise with blood flow restriction (BFR) on performance and fatigue, metabolic stress, and markers of inflammation (interleukin-6 (IL-6)), muscle damage (myoglobin), angiogenesis (vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)). Thirteen resistance-trained participants (four female, 24.8 ± 4.7 years) performed four sets of barbell back-squats (75% 1RM) to failure under two conditions: blood flow restriction (BFR, bilateral 80% occlusion pressure) and control (CTRL). Completed repetitions and pre-post-exercise changes in maximal voluntary isometric contractions, countermovement jump, barbell mean propulsive velocity, and surface electromyography were recorded. Pre-post blood lactate (BLa) and venous blood samples for analysis of IL-6, myoglobin, and VEGF were collected. Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and pain were recorded for each set. Fewer repetitions were performed during BFR (25.5 ± 9.6 reps) compared to CTRL (43.4 ± 14.2 reps, < 0.001), with greater repetitions performed during sets 1, 2, and 4 ( < 0.05) in CTRL. Although RPE between conditions was similar across all sets ( > 0.05), pain was greater in BFR across all sets ( < 0.05). Post-exercise fatigue was comparable between conditions. BLa was significantly greater in CTRL compared to BFR at two minutes ( = 0.001) but not four minutes post-exercise ( = 0.063). IL-6 was significantly elevated following BFR ( = 0.011). Comparable increases in myoglobin ( > 0.05) and no changes in VEGF were observed ( > 0.05). BFR increases the rate of muscular fatigue during high-intensity resistance exercise and acutely enhances IL-6 response, with significantly less total work performed, but increases pain perception, limiting implementation.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨在血流限制(BFR)条件下进行高强度抗阻运动对运动表现和疲劳、代谢应激以及炎症标志物(白细胞介素 6(IL-6))、肌肉损伤(肌红蛋白)、血管生成(血管内皮生长因子(VEGF))的急性影响。13 名有抗阻训练经验的参与者(4 名女性,24.8±4.7 岁)在两种条件下完成了 4 组杠铃深蹲(75% 1RM 至力竭):血流限制(BFR,双侧 80%闭塞压力)和对照(CTRL)。记录了完成的重复次数和最大自主等长收缩、反跳跳、杠铃平均推进速度以及表面肌电图的前后变化。采集了血乳酸(BLa)和静脉血样,用于分析 IL-6、肌红蛋白和 VEGF。为每组记录了主观用力等级(RPE)和疼痛评分。与 CTRL(43.4±14.2 次,<0.001)相比,BFR 时的重复次数更少(25.5±9.6 次),在 CTRL 中,第 1、2 和 4 组的重复次数更多(<0.05)。尽管在所有组中,RPE 在两种条件之间相似(>0.05),但在所有组中,BFR 时的疼痛更大(<0.05)。运动后疲劳在两种条件之间相当。与 BFR 相比,CTRL 在两分钟时的 BLa 显著更高(=0.001),但在四分钟时无差异(=0.063)。BFR 后 IL-6 显著升高(=0.011)。肌红蛋白(>0.05)观察到类似的增加,而 VEGF 没有变化(>0.05)。BFR 增加了高强度抗阻运动过程中肌肉疲劳的速度,并急性增强了 IL-6 反应,尽管总工作量减少,但增加了疼痛感知,限制了实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56c6/9959773/37a9482d86bc/ijerph-20-03555-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56c6/9959773/880e1ec69dcf/ijerph-20-03555-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56c6/9959773/db75a0544189/ijerph-20-03555-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56c6/9959773/37a9482d86bc/ijerph-20-03555-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56c6/9959773/880e1ec69dcf/ijerph-20-03555-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56c6/9959773/db75a0544189/ijerph-20-03555-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56c6/9959773/37a9482d86bc/ijerph-20-03555-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Acute Responses to High-Intensity Back Squats with Bilateral Blood Flow Restriction.双侧血流限制的高强度深蹲后的急性反应。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 17;20(4):3555. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043555.
2
Blood Flow Restriction at High Resistance Loads Increases the Rate of Muscular Fatigue, but Does Not Increase Plasma Markers of Myotrauma or Inflammation.高阻力负荷下的血流限制会增加肌肉疲劳的速度,但不会增加肌肉损伤或炎症的血浆标志物。
J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Sep;34(9):2419-2426. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003742.
3
Acute Responses to Traditional and Cluster-Set Squat Training With and Without Blood Flow Restriction.传统深蹲和集群式深蹲训练及有无血流限制时的急性反应。
J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Aug 1;38(8):1401-1412. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004820. Epub 2024 May 21.
4
Acute effects of exercise under different levels of blood-flow restriction on muscle activation and fatigue.不同程度血流限制下运动对肌肉激活和疲劳的急性影响。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 May;116(5):985-95. doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3359-1. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
5
Acute Neuromuscular Adaptations in Response to Low-Intensity Blood-Flow Restricted Exercise and High-Intensity Resistance Exercise: Are There Any Differences?低强度血流限制运动和高强度抗阻运动对急性神经肌肉适应的影响:有何不同?
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Apr;32(4):902-910. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002022.
6
Blood flow restriction during self-paced aerobic intervals reduces mechanical and cardiovascular demands without modifying neuromuscular fatigue.在自主进行的有氧间歇期间进行血流限制会降低机械和心血管需求,而不会改变神经肌肉疲劳。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2023 May;23(5):755-765. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2022.2062056. Epub 2022 May 14.
7
Blood flow restriction does not alter the early hypertrophic signaling and short-term adaptive response to resistance exercise when performed to task failure.血流限制不会改变向心收缩运动至力竭时早期的肥厚信号和短期的适应性反应。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2023 May 1;134(5):1265-1277. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00529.2022. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
8
Blood-Flow Restriction Resistance Exercise Promotes Lower Pain and Ratings of Perceived Exertion Compared With Either High- or Low-Intensity Resistance Exercise Performed to Muscular Failure.血流限制抗阻运动与高强度或低强度抗阻运动至力竭相比,可降低疼痛和感知用力程度。
J Sport Rehabil. 2019 Sep 1;28(7):706-710. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2018-0030.
9
Acute neuromuscular, cardiovascular, and muscle oxygenation responses to low-intensity aerobic interval exercises with blood flow restriction.急性神经肌肉、心血管及肌肉氧合对采用血流限制的低强度有氧间歇运动的反应。
Exp Physiol. 2024 Aug;109(8):1353-1369. doi: 10.1113/EP091742. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
10
Effects of low load exercise with and without blood-flow restriction on microvascular oxygenation, muscle excitability and perceived pain.低负荷运动结合或不结合血流限制对微血管氧合、肌肉兴奋性和感知疼痛的影响。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2023 Apr;23(4):542-551. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2022.2039781. Epub 2022 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of blood flow restriction training on post activation potentiation and fatigue level: systematic review with meta-analysis.血流限制训练对激活后增强及疲劳水平的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Physiol. 2025 Apr 10;16:1558008. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1558008. eCollection 2025.
2
Acute Responses of Low-Load Resistance Exercise with Blood Flow Restriction.低负荷血流限制抗阻运动的急性反应
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Dec 4;9(4):254. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9040254.
3
The Effect of Blood Flow Restriction during Low-Load Resistance Training Unit on Knee Flexor Muscle Fatigue in Recreational Athletes: A Randomized Double-Blinded Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Varying Load Intensity on Skeletal Muscle Damage Between Two Isovolumic Resistance Exercise Bouts.两次等容抗阻运动期间不同负荷强度对骨骼肌损伤的影响。
Int J Exerc Sci. 2022 Aug 1;15(4):1212-1221. doi: 10.70252/HXMP5676. eCollection 2022.
2
Hemodynamic Responses to Resistance Exercise with Blood Flow Restriction Using a Practical Method Versus a Traditional Cuff-Inflation System.血流限制下使用实用方法与传统袖带充气系统进行抗阻运动的血液动力学反应。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 14;19(18):11548. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811548.
3
Blood Flow Restriction at High Resistance Loads Increases the Rate of Muscular Fatigue, but Does Not Increase Plasma Markers of Myotrauma or Inflammation.
低负荷抗阻训练单元中血流限制对业余运动员膝屈肌疲劳的影响:一项随机双盲安慰剂对照试验性研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 13;13(18):5444. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185444.
高阻力负荷下的血流限制会增加肌肉疲劳的速度,但不会增加肌肉损伤或炎症的血浆标志物。
J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Sep;34(9):2419-2426. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003742.
4
Commentary: Can Blood Flow Restricted Exercise Cause Muscle Damage? Commentary on Blood Flow Restriction Exercise: Considerations of Methodology, Application, and Safety.评论:血流限制训练会导致肌肉损伤吗?关于血流限制训练的评论:方法学、应用及安全性考量
Front Physiol. 2020 Mar 20;11:243. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00243. eCollection 2020.
5
2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2017美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国医师协会/美国心脏病学学会/美国预防医学学院/美国老年病学会/美国药学协会/美国血液学会/美国预防医学学会/美国医学协会/美国初级保健医师学会成人高血压预防、检测、评估和管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 15;71(19):e127-e248. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
6
Blood flow restriction increases metabolic stress but decreases muscle activation during high-load resistance exercise.在高负荷抗阻运动期间,血流限制会增加代谢应激,但会降低肌肉激活程度。
Muscle Nerve. 2018 Jan;57(1):107-111. doi: 10.1002/mus.25616. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
7
The countermovement jump to monitor neuromuscular status: A meta-analysis.用于监测神经肌肉状态的反向跳试验:一项荟萃分析。
J Sci Med Sport. 2017 Apr;20(4):397-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.08.011. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
8
Practical Assessment of Body Composition.身体成分的实际评估
Phys Sportsmed. 1985 May;13(5):76-90. doi: 10.1080/00913847.1985.11708790.
9
Are there perceptual differences to varying levels of blood flow restriction?对于不同程度的血流限制,是否存在感知差异?
Physiol Behav. 2016 Apr 1;157:277-80. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.02.022. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
10
Comparisons between low-intensity resistance training with blood flow restriction and high-intensity resistance training on quadriceps muscle mass and strength in elderly.老年人群中,低强度血流限制阻力训练与高强度阻力训练对股四头肌肌肉量和力量影响的比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Apr;29(4):1071-6. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000703.