Winchester Lee J, Morris Cody E, Allen Patton, Wiczynski Teresa L, Arnett Scott W, Lyons T Scott
Department of Kinesiology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
Department of Human Studies, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2022 Aug 1;15(4):1212-1221. doi: 10.70252/HXMP5676. eCollection 2022.
There are limited data comparing the efficacy of resistance loads within the hypertrophy range for promoting muscular growth, particularly when similar training volumes are utilized. The purpose of this study was to determine if two similar volume-loads, utilizing different intensities, would produce dissimilar muscular damage and inflammation. Eleven resistance-trained, college-aged males participated in this study. After testing 1RM barbell squats, participants completed two similar volume-load barbell squat sessions at two different resistance loads (67% and 85% of 1RM) on two separate visits. Venous blood samples were collected at baseline and one hour after completion of each exercise session. Plasma was isolated and analyzed for myoglobin and C-reactive protein (CRP) expression via ELISA. Plasma myoglobin expression was significantly elevated above baseline (BASE) values only after the 85% of 1RM (HHL) session (p =0.031), though the 67% (LHL) trial (p = 0.054; η = 0.647) was approaching significance (BASE: 1.42±.12 ng/mL; LHL: 4.65±1.13 ng/mL; HHL: 5.00±1.01 ng/mL). No changes in plasma CRP were observed. Despite attempts to equate volumes between resistances, mean total volume-load was significantly higher during the 67% of 1RM trial than during the 85% trial. Resistance loads at 85% of 1RM inflict significantly increased muscle damage over baseline values, even when significantly less total volume was lifted during the 85% trial. Individuals looking to maximize strength and hypertrophy during general training or during rehabilitation may benefit from these findings when determining the appropriate training load.
关于在促进肌肉生长的肥大范围内比较不同阻力负荷效果的数据有限,尤其是在使用相似训练量的情况下。本研究的目的是确定两种相似的容量负荷,采用不同强度,是否会产生不同的肌肉损伤和炎症。11名接受过抗阻训练的大学年龄男性参与了本研究。在测试1RM杠铃深蹲后,参与者在两次单独的访视中,以两种不同的阻力负荷(1RM的67%和85%)完成了两次相似的容量负荷杠铃深蹲训练。在每次训练开始前和结束后1小时采集静脉血样。分离血浆并通过ELISA分析肌红蛋白和C反应蛋白(CRP)的表达。仅在1RM的85%(高负荷组)训练后,血浆肌红蛋白表达显著高于基线(BASE)值(p = 0.031),尽管1RM的67%(低负荷组)试验接近显著水平(p = 0.054;η = 0.647)(BASE:1.42±.12 ng/mL;低负荷组:4.65±1.13 ng/mL;高负荷组:5.00±1.01 ng/mL)。未观察到血浆CRP有变化。尽管试图使不同阻力下的训练量相等,但1RM的67%试验中的平均总容量负荷显著高于85%试验。即使在85%试验中举起的总容量显著较少,1RM的85%阻力负荷造成的肌肉损伤仍比基线值显著增加。在确定合适的训练负荷时,希望在一般训练或康复过程中最大化力量和肌肉肥大的个体可能会从这些发现中受益。