• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“自带设备”-创伤中可穿戴结果评估的新方法。

"Bring Your Own Device"-A New Approach to Wearable Outcome Assessment in Trauma.

机构信息

Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, BG Unfallklinik, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.

Human Motion, Orthopaedics, Sports Medicine and Digital Methods Group, Department Precision Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, 1445 Luxembourg, Luxembourg.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Feb 19;59(2):403. doi: 10.3390/medicina59020403.

DOI:10.3390/medicina59020403
PMID:36837604
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9966638/
Abstract

: Outcome data from wearable devices are increasingly used in both research and clinics. Traditionally, a dedicated device is chosen for a given study or clinical application to collect outcome data as soon as the patient is included in a study or undergoes a procedure. The current study introduces a new measurement strategy, whereby patients' own devices are utilized, allowing for both a pre-injury baseline measure and ability to show achievable results. : Patients with a pre-existing musculoskeletal injury of the upper and lower extremity were included in this exploratory, proof-of-concept study. They were followed up for a minimum of 6 weeks after injury, and their wearable outcome data (from a smartphone and/or a body-worn sensor) were continuously acquired during this period. A descriptive analysis of the screening characteristics and the observed and achievable outcome patterns was performed. : A total of 432 patients was continuously screened for the study, and their screening was analyzed. The highest success rate for successful inclusion was in younger patients. Forty-eight patients were included in the analysis. The most prevalent outcome was step count. Three distinctive activity data patterns were observed: patients recovering, patients with slow or no recovery, and patients needing additional measures to determine treatment outcomes. : Measuring outcomes in trauma patients with the Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) strategy is feasible. With this approach, patients were able to provide continuous activity data without any dedicated equipment given to them. The measurement technique is especially suited to particular patient groups. Our study's screening log and inclusion characteristics can help inform future studies wishing to employ the BYOD design.

摘要

可穿戴设备的结果数据在研究和临床中越来越多地被使用。传统上,会为特定的研究或临床应用选择专用设备来收集结果数据,只要患者被纳入研究或接受治疗程序。本研究引入了一种新的测量策略,即利用患者自己的设备,既能进行受伤前的基线测量,也能展示可实现的结果。

本探索性、概念验证研究纳入了上肢和下肢有预先存在的肌肉骨骼损伤的患者。他们在受伤后至少随访 6 周,在此期间持续获取可穿戴的结果数据(来自智能手机和/或身体佩戴式传感器)。对筛选特征和观察到的和可实现的结果模式进行了描述性分析。

共有 432 名患者被连续筛选入组进行研究,并对其筛选进行了分析。年轻患者的入组成功率最高。有 48 名患者纳入分析。最常见的结果是步数。观察到三种不同的活动数据模式:恢复中的患者、恢复缓慢或无恢复的患者,以及需要额外措施来确定治疗结果的患者。

使用自带设备(Bring Your Own Device,BYOD)策略来测量创伤患者的结果是可行的。通过这种方法,患者可以提供连续的活动数据,而无需提供专用设备。这种测量技术尤其适合特定的患者群体。我们的研究筛选日志和纳入特征可以为希望采用 BYOD 设计的未来研究提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42d9/9966638/9bf0981cb008/medicina-59-00403-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42d9/9966638/78f76a6080e4/medicina-59-00403-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42d9/9966638/1c39c4bcf8d1/medicina-59-00403-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42d9/9966638/9bf0981cb008/medicina-59-00403-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42d9/9966638/78f76a6080e4/medicina-59-00403-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42d9/9966638/1c39c4bcf8d1/medicina-59-00403-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42d9/9966638/9bf0981cb008/medicina-59-00403-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
"Bring Your Own Device"-A New Approach to Wearable Outcome Assessment in Trauma.“自带设备”-创伤中可穿戴结果评估的新方法。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Feb 19;59(2):403. doi: 10.3390/medicina59020403.
2
Wearable activity data can predict functional recovery after musculoskeletal injury: Feasibility of a machine learning approach.可穿戴活动数据可预测肌肉骨骼损伤后的功能恢复:机器学习方法的可行性。
Injury. 2024 Feb;55(2):111254. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111254. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
3
Demographic Imbalances Resulting From the Bring-Your-Own-Device Study Design.因自带设备研究设计导致的人口统计学失衡。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Apr 8;10(4):e29510. doi: 10.2196/29510.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Comparability of a provisioned device versus bring your own device for completion of patient-reported outcome measures by participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: qualitative interview findings.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者使用配备设备与自带设备完成患者报告结局测量的可比性:定性访谈结果
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 Aug 4;6(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00492-5.
6
"Bring Your Own Device" (BYOD): The Future of Field-Based Patient-Reported Outcome Data Collection in Clinical Trials?“自带设备”(BYOD):临床试验中基于现场的患者报告结局数据收集的未来?
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2015 Nov;49(6):783-791. doi: 10.1177/2168479015609104.
7
Are Accelerometer-based Functional Outcome Assessments Feasible and Valid After Treatment for Lower Extremity Sarcomas?基于加速度计的功能结局评估在下肢肉瘤治疗后是否可行和有效?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Mar;478(3):482-503. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000883.
8
Comparison of wearable sensor to traditional methods in functional outcome measures: A systematic review.可穿戴传感器与传统方法在功能结局测量中的比较:一项系统综述。
J Orthop Res. 2021 Oct;39(10):2093-2102. doi: 10.1002/jor.24950. Epub 2020 Dec 20.
9
Feasibility and efficacy of wearable devices for upper limb rehabilitation in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study.可穿戴设备用于慢性脑卒中患者上肢康复的可行性和疗效:一项随机对照初步研究。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Jun;54(3):388-396. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04691-3. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
10
To BYOD or not: Are device latencies important for bring-your-own-device (BYOD) smartphone cognitive testing?是否采用自带设备(BYOD):设备延迟对于自带设备(BYOD)智能手机认知测试重要吗?
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Sep;55(6):2800-2812. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01925-1. Epub 2022 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards a comprehensive digital wearable tracking system of the patient recovery journey after extremity trauma: a narrative review.迈向肢体创伤后患者康复历程的全面数字可穿戴跟踪系统:一篇叙述性综述
EFORT Open Rev. 2025 Jul 1;10(7):445-453. doi: 10.1530/EOR-2024-0154.
2
Patient Recruitment Characteristics for Wearable-Sensor-Based Outcome Assessment in Trauma Surgery.创伤外科中基于可穿戴传感器的结果评估的患者招募特征
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 26;14(3):805. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030805.
3
Collecting Real-Time Patient-Reported Outcome Data During Latent Labor: Feasibility Study of the MyCap Mobile App in Prospective Person-Centered Research.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of Wearable Technology to Measure Activity in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review.可穿戴技术在骨科创伤患者活动量测量中的应用:一项系统综述
Indian J Orthop. 2022 Apr 9;56(7):1112-1122. doi: 10.1007/s43465-022-00629-0. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
Wearable activity trackers-advanced technology or advanced marketing?可穿戴活动追踪器——是先进技术还是先进营销?
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2022 Sep;122(9):1975-1990. doi: 10.1007/s00421-022-04951-1. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
3
Wearable technology in orthopedic trauma surgery - An AO trauma survey and review of current and future applications.
在潜伏期采集实时患者报告的结局数据:MyCap 移动应用在前瞻性以患者为中心的研究中的可行性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 8;8:e59155. doi: 10.2196/59155.
4
Feasibility of Observing Cerebrovascular Disease Phenotypes with Smartphone Monitoring: Study Design Considerations for Real-World Studies.使用智能手机监测观察脑血管病表型的可行性:真实世界研究的设计考虑因素。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jun 2;24(11):3595. doi: 10.3390/s24113595.
5
Wearable Sensors in Other Medical Domains with Application Potential for Orthopedic Trauma Surgery-A Narrative Review.具有骨科创伤手术应用潜力的其他医学领域中的可穿戴传感器——一项叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2024 May 27;13(11):3134. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113134.
骨科创伤手术中的可穿戴技术 - AO 创伤调查及当前和未来应用的回顾。
Injury. 2022 Jun;53(6):1961-1965. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.03.026. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
4
Remote Healthcare for Elderly People Using Wearables: A Review.利用可穿戴设备为老年人提供远程医疗服务:综述。
Biosensors (Basel). 2022 Jan 27;12(2):73. doi: 10.3390/bios12020073.
5
SensorHub: Multimodal Sensing in Real-Life Enables Home-Based Studies.传感器中心:现实生活中的多模式感知使基于家庭的研究成为可能。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jan 5;22(1):408. doi: 10.3390/s22010408.
6
A Narrative Literature Review of Bias in Collecting Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs).收集患者报告结局测量(PROMs)数据时的偏倚:叙事文献综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 26;18(23):12445. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312445.
7
Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.日常步数与全因死亡率:前瞻性队列研究的剂量-反应荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2022 Jan;52(1):89-99. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01536-4. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
8
Use of Physiological Data From a Wearable Device to Identify SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Symptoms and Predict COVID-19 Diagnosis: Observational Study.利用可穿戴设备的生理数据识别 SARS-CoV-2 感染和症状并预测 COVID-19 诊断:观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 22;23(2):e26107. doi: 10.2196/26107.
9
Validity of Consumer Activity Monitors and an Algorithm Using Smartphone Data for Measuring Steps during Different Activity Types.消费者活动监测器的有效性及一种使用智能手机数据测量不同活动类型下步数的算法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 12;17(24):9314. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249314.
10
Potential problems in the use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and reporting of PROM data in sports science.患者报告结局测量(PROMs)在使用中以及在运动科学中报告 PROM 数据时可能存在的问题。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021 Jun;31(6):1249-1258. doi: 10.1111/sms.13888. Epub 2020 Dec 30.