Suppr超能文献

与这些应激源本身的作用相比,通过主动与被动热应激使身体脱水对血浆容量或渗透压的影响有限。

Limited Effect of Dehydrating via Active vs. Passive Heat Stress on Plasma Volume or Osmolality, Relative to the Effect of These Stressors per Se.

机构信息

School of Physical Education, Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.

Faculty of Medicine, Université de Lorraine, Inserm, DCAC, F-54000 Nancy, France.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2023 Feb 10;15(4):904. doi: 10.3390/nu15040904.

Abstract

The physiological, perceptual, and functional effects of dehydration may depend on how it is incurred (e.g., intense exercise releases endogenous water via glycogenolysis) but this basic notion has rarely been examined. We investigated the effects of active (exercise) heat- vs. passive heat-induced dehydration, and the kinetics of ad libitum rehydration following each method. Twelve fit participants (five females and seven males) completed four trials in randomised order: DEHydration to -3% change in body mass (∆BM) under passive or active heat stress, and EUHydration to prevent ∆BM under passive or active heat stress. In all trials, participants then sat in a temperate-controlled environment, ate a standard snack and had free access to water and sports drink during their two-hour recovery. During mild dehydration (≤2% ∆BM), active and passive heating caused comparable increases in plasma osmolality (P: ~4 mOsmol/kg, interaction: = 0.138) and reductions in plasma volume (PV: ~10%, interaction: = 0.718), but heat stress per se was the main driver of hypovolaemia. Thirst in DEHydration was comparably stimulated by active than passive heat stress ( < 0.161) and shared the same relation to P (r ≥ 0.744) and ∆BM (r ≥ 0.882). Following heat exposures, at 3% gross ∆BM, PV reduction was approximately twice as large from passive versus active heating ( = 0.003), whereas P perturbations were approximately twice as large from EUHydration versus DEHydration ( < 0.001). Rehydrating ad libitum resulted in a similar net fluid balance between passive versus active heat stress and restored PV despite the incomplete replacement of ∆BM. In conclusion, dehydrating by 2% ∆BM via passive heat stress generally did not cause larger changes to PV or P than via active heat stress. The heat stressors themselves caused a greater reduction in PV than dehydration did, whereas ingesting water to maintain euhydration produced large reductions in P in recovery and therefore appears to be of more physiological significance.

摘要

脱水对生理、感知和功能的影响可能取决于脱水的方式(例如,剧烈运动通过糖异生释放内源性水),但这一基本概念很少被研究过。我们研究了主动(运动)热与被动热引起的脱水的影响,以及两种方法后随意再水合的动力学。12 名健康参与者(5 名女性和 7 名男性)以随机顺序完成了四项试验:在被动或主动热应激下脱水至体重减轻 3%(∆BM),以及在被动或主动热应激下防止 ∆BM 脱水。在所有试验中,参与者随后坐在温度受控的环境中,吃标准小吃,并在两小时恢复期内自由饮用水和运动饮料。在轻度脱水(≤2% ∆BM)期间,主动和被动加热引起相似的血浆渗透压升高(P:4 mOsmol/kg,交互作用:= 0.138)和血浆体积减少(PV:10%,交互作用:= 0.718),但热应激本身是低血容量的主要驱动因素。主动热应激引起的口渴与被动热应激相似(<0.161),与 P(r≥0.744)和 ∆BM(r≥0.882)的关系相同。在热暴露后,在 3%总 ∆BM 时,被动与主动加热引起的 PV 减少量大约相差两倍(=0.003),而 EUHydration 与 DEHydration 引起的 P 波动大约相差两倍(<0.001)。随意再水合导致被动与主动热应激之间的净液体平衡相似,尽管∆BM 未完全补充,但恢复了 PV。总之,通过被动热应激使体重减轻 2% ∆BM 通常不会引起比主动热应激更大的 PV 或 P 变化。热应激本身引起的 PV 减少量大于脱水引起的,而摄入水以维持水合状态会在恢复期间引起 P 的大幅下降,因此似乎具有更重要的生理意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7942/9959915/48954945987f/nutrients-15-00904-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验