Kim Han Joo, Hwang Sang-Hyun, Oh Heung-Bum, Ko Dae-Hyun
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Blood Res. 2023 Apr 30;58(S1):S8-S10. doi: 10.5045/br.2023.2023009. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
Transfusion is an essential life-sustaining treatment for many patients. However, unnecessary transfusion has been reported to be related to worse patient outcomes. Further, owing to the recent pandemic, blood supply has been more challenging to maintain. Many studies have been conducted to elucidate the optimal transfusion threshold for many clinical conditions, and most suggested that a restrictive transfusion strategy has advantages over a liberal transfusion strategy. Hematologic disorders, which require chronic transfusion in many cases, have not been the main subjects of such studies, and only little evidence is available regarding the optimal transfusion threshold in these patients. According to several recent studies, a liberal transfusion strategy is preferable for patients with hematologic disorders due to their quality of life. A patient-centered approach is needed for proper management of hematologic disorders.
输血对许多患者来说是维持生命的重要治疗方法。然而,据报道不必要的输血与更差的患者预后相关。此外,由于最近的疫情,维持血液供应更具挑战性。已经进行了许多研究以阐明许多临床情况下的最佳输血阈值,并且大多数研究表明限制性输血策略比宽松输血策略更具优势。血液系统疾病在许多情况下需要长期输血,但尚未成为此类研究的主要对象,关于这些患者的最佳输血阈值只有很少的证据。根据最近的几项研究,由于生活质量的原因,宽松输血策略对血液系统疾病患者更可取。血液系统疾病的合理管理需要以患者为中心的方法。