Ittner Sandra, Mühlbacher Dominik, Vollrath Mark, Weisswange Thomas H
Würzburg Institute for Traffic Sciences (WIVW) GmbH, Veitshöchheim, Germany.
Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 9;14:1024540. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1024540. eCollection 2023.
The front seat passenger is often neglected when developing support systems for cars. There exist few examples of systems that provide information or interaction possibilities specifically to those passengers. Previous research indicated that the passive role of the passenger can frequently lead to a feeling of discomfort, potentially caused by missing information and missing control with respect to the driving situation. This paper investigates if and how different aspects of cognitive processes as defined in a previously published model can be approached with a technical system to reduce discomfort in passengers. Five prototypical passenger assistance systems are created which provide missing information (for example about the attentiveness of the driver) or the possibility to have more influence as a passenger. In a static simulator study with = 40 participants, these systems were investigated with respect to their influence on measures of discomfort. Participants experienced in a counterbalanced order car following and braking scenarios on the highway with different time headways (within-subjects), with and without one of the passenger assistance systems (between-subjects). Based on the subjective measures for each experienced situation, three systems were identified as particularly useful in reducing discomfort. These displayed the attentiveness of the driver, the safety distance to a vehicle in front or provided the possibility to signal the driver that the recent safety distance is too small. These best proposals significantly reduced passenger discomfort in the tested Following and Braking scenarios for different time headways. In the post inquiry, more than 64% of the passengers confirmed the helpfulness of the rated system in reducing their discomfort in each case and about 75% of the passengers reported an interest in using it in their vehicle. This demonstrates opportunities to improve the everyday driving experience beyond classical assistance systems by explicitly considering the needs of passengers.
在开发汽车支持系统时,前排乘客常常被忽视。专门为这些乘客提供信息或互动可能性的系统实例很少。先前的研究表明,乘客的被动角色常常会导致不适感,这可能是由于缺乏关于驾驶情况的信息以及对驾驶情况缺乏控制所致。本文研究是否以及如何通过技术系统来解决先前发布的模型中所定义的认知过程的不同方面,以减轻乘客的不适感。创建了五个原型乘客辅助系统,这些系统提供缺失的信息(例如关于驾驶员的注意力)或让乘客有更多影响力的可能性。在一项有40名参与者的静态模拟器研究中,针对这些系统对不适感测量指标的影响进行了调查。参与者以平衡的顺序在高速公路上体验不同车头时距(受试者内)的跟车和制动场景,有或没有其中一个乘客辅助系统(受试者间)。根据对每种体验情况的主观测量,确定了三个系统在减轻不适感方面特别有用。这些系统显示驾驶员的注意力、与前车的安全距离,或提供向驾驶员发出近期安全距离过小信号的可能性。这些最佳方案在不同车头时距的测试跟车和制动场景中显著降低了乘客的不适感。在事后询问中,超过64%的乘客确认了所评价系统在每种情况下减轻其不适感的帮助,约75%的乘客表示有兴趣在自己的车辆中使用该系统。这表明通过明确考虑乘客的需求,有机会超越传统辅助系统来改善日常驾驶体验。