Rudke A P, Martins J A, Hallak R, Martins L D, de Almeida D S, Beal A, Freitas E D, Andrade M F, Koutrakis P, Albuquerque T T A
Department of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627, 31270-901 Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Federal University of Technology - Paraná, Av. Dos Pioneiros, 3131, 86036-370 Londrina, Brazil.
Remote Sens Environ. 2023 May 1;289:113514. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113514. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
Atmospheric pollutant data retrieved through satellite sensors are continually used to assess changes in air quality in the lower atmosphere. During the COVID-19 pandemic, several studies started to use satellite measurements to evaluate changes in air quality in many different regions worldwide. However, although satellite data is continuously validated, it is known that its accuracy may vary between monitored areas, requiring regionalized quality assessments. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate whether satellites could measure changes in the air quality of the state of São Paulo, Brazil, during the COVID-19 outbreak; and to verify the relationship between satellite-based data [Tropospheric NO column density and Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD)] and ground-based concentrations [NO and particulate material (PM; coarse: PM and fine: PM)]. For this purpose, tropospheric NO obtained from the TROPOMI sensor and AOD retrieved from MODIS sensor data by using the Multi-Angle Implementation of Atmospheric Correction (MAIAC) algorithm were compared with concentrations obtained from 50 automatic ground monitoring stations. The results showed low correlations between PM and AOD. For PM, most stations showed correlations lower than 0.2, which were not significant. The results for PM were similar, but some stations showed good correlations for specific periods (before or during the COVID-19 outbreak). Satellite-based Tropospheric NO proved to be a good predictor for NO concentrations at ground level. Considering all stations with NO measurements, correlations >0.6 were observed, reaching 0.8 for specific stations and periods. In general, it was observed that regions with a more industrialized profile had the best correlations, in contrast with rural areas. In addition, it was observed about 57% reductions in tropospheric NO throughout the state of São Paulo during the COVID-19 outbreak. Variations in air pollutants were linked to the region economic vocation, since there were reductions in industrialized areas (at least 50% of the industrialized areas showed >20% decrease in NO) and increases in areas with farming and livestock characteristics (about 70% of those areas showed increase in NO). Our results demonstrate that Tropospheric NO column densities can serve as good predictors of NO concentrations at ground level. For MAIAC-AOD, a weak relationship was observed, requiring the evaluation of other possible predictors to describe the relationship with PM. Thus, it is concluded that regionalized assessment of satellite data accuracy is essential for assertive estimates on a regional/local level. Good quality information retrieved at specific polluted areas does not assure a worldwide use of remote sensor data.
通过卫星传感器获取的大气污染物数据持续用于评估低层大气空气质量的变化。在新冠疫情期间,多项研究开始利用卫星测量来评估全球许多不同地区的空气质量变化。然而,尽管卫星数据不断得到验证,但众所周知,其准确性在不同监测区域可能会有所不同,需要进行区域化质量评估。因此,本研究旨在评估卫星能否测量巴西圣保罗州在新冠疫情爆发期间空气质量的变化;并验证基于卫星的数据[对流层一氧化氮柱密度和气溶胶光学厚度(AOD)]与地面浓度[一氧化氮和颗粒物(PM;粗颗粒物:PM 和细颗粒物:PM)]之间的关系。为此,将利用多角度大气校正(MAIAC)算法从TROPOMI传感器获得的对流层一氧化氮和从MODIS传感器数据中检索到的AOD与从50个地面自动监测站获得的浓度进行了比较。结果显示,PM与AOD之间的相关性较低。对于PM,大多数监测站的相关性低于0.2,不具有显著性。PM的结果类似,但一些监测站在特定时期(新冠疫情爆发前或期间)显示出良好的相关性。基于卫星的对流层一氧化氮被证明是地面一氧化氮浓度的良好预测指标。考虑到所有进行一氧化氮测量的监测站,观察到相关性>0.6,特定监测站和时期的相关性达到0.8。总体而言,观察到工业化程度较高的地区相关性最佳,与农村地区形成对比。此外,在新冠疫情爆发期间,圣保罗州的对流层一氧化氮整体减少了约57%。空气污染物的变化与地区经济行业相关,因为工业化地区出现了减少(至少50%的工业化地区一氧化氮减少>20%),而具有农牧业特征的地区则出现了增加(约70%的此类地区一氧化氮增加)。我们的结果表明,对流层一氧化氮柱密度可作为地面一氧化氮浓度的良好预测指标。对于MAIAC - AOD,观察到的关系较弱,需要评估其他可能的预测指标来描述其与PM的关系。因此,得出结论,对卫星数据准确性进行区域化评估对于在区域/地方层面进行可靠估计至关重要。在特定污染地区获取的高质量信息并不能确保在全球范围内使用遥感数据。