• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情期间人类流动性和控制措施对交通安全的影响。

The effect of human mobility and control measures on traffic safety during COVID-19 pandemic.

机构信息

School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China.

National United Engineering Laboratory of Integrated and Intelligent Transportation, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 8;16(3):e0243263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243263. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0243263
PMID:33684104
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7939376/
Abstract

As mobile device location data become increasingly available, new analyses are revealing the significant changes of mobility pattern when an unplanned event happened. With different control policies from local and state government, the COVID-19 outbreak has dramatically changed mobility behavior in affected cities. This study has been investigating the impact of COVID-19 on the number of people involved in crashes accounting for the intensity of different control measures using Negative Binomial (NB) method. Based on a comprehensive dataset of people involved in crashes aggregated in New York City during January 1, 2020 to May 24, 2020, people involved in crashes with respect to travel behavior, traffic characteristics and socio-demographic characteristics are found. The results show that the average person miles traveled on the main traffic mode per person per day, percentage of work trip have positive effect on person involved in crashes. On the contrary, unemployment rate and inflation rate have negative effects on person involved in crashes. Interestingly, different level of control policies during COVID-19 outbreak are closely associated with safety awareness, driving and travel behavior, and thus has an indirect influence on the frequency of crashes. Comparing to other three control policies including emergence declare, limits on mass gatherings, and ban on all nonessential gathering, the negative relationship between stay-at-home policy implemented in New York City from March 20, 2020 and the number of people involved crashes is found in our study.

摘要

随着移动设备位置数据的日益普及,新的分析显示,当意外事件发生时,移动模式发生了显著变化。由于地方和州政府采取了不同的控制政策,COVID-19 疫情极大地改变了受影响城市的流动行为。本研究使用负二项(NB)方法,调查了 COVID-19 对涉及车祸人数的影响,同时考虑了不同控制措施的强度。本研究基于 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 5 月 24 日期间在纽约市汇总的涉及车祸人员的综合数据集,研究了与旅行行为、交通特征和社会人口特征有关的涉及车祸人员。结果表明,主要交通方式上人均每日行驶里程、工作出行比例对涉及车祸人员有正向影响。相反,失业率和通货膨胀率对涉及车祸人员有负向影响。有趣的是,COVID-19 疫情期间不同级别的控制政策与安全意识、驾驶和旅行行为密切相关,因此对车祸频率有间接影响。与其他三种控制政策(包括宣布紧急状态、限制大规模集会和禁止所有非必要集会)相比,我们的研究发现,2020 年 3 月 20 日纽约市实施的就地避难政策与涉及车祸人数呈负相关关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf24/7939376/2e6c41fbc090/pone.0243263.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf24/7939376/047f6d5259ff/pone.0243263.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf24/7939376/2e6c41fbc090/pone.0243263.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf24/7939376/047f6d5259ff/pone.0243263.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf24/7939376/2e6c41fbc090/pone.0243263.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of human mobility and control measures on traffic safety during COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间人类流动性和控制措施对交通安全的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 8;16(3):e0243263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243263. eCollection 2021.
2
Impact of COVID-19 travel-restriction policies on road traffic accident patterns with emphasis on cyclists: A case study of New York City.新冠疫情旅行限制政策对道路交通意外模式的影响,重点关注骑自行车的人:以纽约市为例。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Mar;167:106586. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106586. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
3
Progress in teenage crash risk during the last decade.过去十年间青少年撞车风险的进展。
J Safety Res. 2007;38(2):137-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.02.001. Epub 2007 Mar 28.
4
Impact of data aggregation approaches on the relationships between operating speed and traffic safety.数据聚合方法对运行速度与交通安全之间关系的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Nov;120:304-310. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.06.007. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
5
Ironic effects of political ideology and increased risk-taking in Ohio drivers during COVID-19 shutdown.在 COVID-19 封锁期间,俄亥俄州司机的政治意识形态和冒险行为增加带来的讽刺效果。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 19;17(12):e0279160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279160. eCollection 2022.
6
Factors associated with risky driving behaviors for road traffic crashes among professional car drivers in Bahirdar city, northwest Ethiopia, 2016: a cross-sectional study.2016 年,埃塞俄比亚西北部巴赫达尔市职业司机发生道路交通碰撞事故的高风险驾驶行为的相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Environ Health Prev Med. 2019 Mar 9;24(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12199-019-0772-1.
7
Initial impact of COVID-19's stay-at-home order on motor vehicle traffic and crash patterns in Connecticut: an interrupted time series analysis.新冠疫情居家令对康涅狄格州机动车交通和事故模式的初始影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
Inj Prev. 2021 Feb;27(1):3-9. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2020-043945. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
8
Association of human mobility with road crashes for pandemic-ready safer mobility: A New York City case study.人类流动性与道路碰撞的关联,以实现大流行准备下更安全的流动性:纽约市案例研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Feb;165:106478. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106478. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
9
Fatal connections--socioeconomic determinants of road accident risk and drunk driving in Sweden.致命联系——瑞典道路事故风险和酒驾的社会经济决定因素。
J Safety Res. 2013 Sep;46:59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2013.04.001. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
10
Determinants of road traffic safety: New evidence from Australia using state-space analysis.道路交通安全的决定因素:澳大利亚使用状态空间分析的新证据。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Sep;94:65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.05.012. Epub 2016 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on road traffic injuries in Iran: An interrupted time-series analysis.COVID-19 大流行对伊朗道路交通伤害的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 17;19(6):e0305081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305081. eCollection 2024.
2
Alcohol-related non-fatal motor vehicle crash injury in the US from 2019 to 2022.2019 年至 2022 年美国与酒精相关的非致命机动车碰撞伤害。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2024 Mar 3;50(2):252-260. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2024.2309336. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
3
Evaluating TROPOMI and MODIS performance to capture the dynamic of air pollution in São Paulo state: A case study during the COVID-19 outbreak.

本文引用的文献

1
Interactive COVID-19 Mobility Impact and Social Distancing Analysis Platform.交互式新冠疫情出行影响与社交距离分析平台
Transp Res Rec. 2023 Apr;2677(4):168-180. doi: 10.1177/03611981211043813. Epub 2021 Sep 18.
2
The effect of COVID-19 and subsequent social distancing on travel behavior.新冠疫情及后续社交距离措施对出行行为的影响。
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 May;5:100121. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100121. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
3
The Association Between Health Status and Insomnia, Mental Health, and Preventive Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Fear of COVID-19.
评估TROPOMI和MODIS捕捉圣保罗州空气污染动态的性能:以新冠疫情期间为例
Remote Sens Environ. 2023 May 1;289:113514. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113514. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
4
Impact of COVID-19 on traffic safety from the "Lockdown" to the "New Normal": A case study of Utah.从“封城”到“新常态”新冠疫情对交通安全的影响:犹他州案例研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 May;184:106995. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.106995. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
5
Crash harm before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence for spatial heterogeneity in Tennessee.新冠肺炎大流行前后的车祸伤害:田纳西州的空间异质性证据。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Apr;183:106988. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.106988. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
6
Ironic effects of political ideology and increased risk-taking in Ohio drivers during COVID-19 shutdown.在 COVID-19 封锁期间,俄亥俄州司机的政治意识形态和冒险行为增加带来的讽刺效果。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 19;17(12):e0279160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279160. eCollection 2022.
7
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on socio-economic, energy-environment and transport sector globally and sustainable development goal (SDG).新冠疫情对全球社会经济、能源环境及交通领域的影响以及可持续发展目标
J Clean Prod. 2021 Aug 20;312:127705. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127705. Epub 2021 May 31.
8
Exploring the Effectiveness of Sustainability Measurement: Which ESG Metrics Will Survive COVID-19?探索可持续性衡量的有效性:哪些环境、社会和治理(ESG)指标将在新冠疫情中留存下来?
J Bus Ethics. 2022 Aug 4:1-18. doi: 10.1007/s10551-022-05183-1.
9
How Effective Is a Traffic Control Policy in Blocking the Spread of COVID-19? A Case Study of Changsha, China.交通管控政策阻断 COVID-19 传播的有效性如何?以中国长沙为例的案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 27;19(13):7884. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137884.
10
Assessment of Traffic Accidents in Japan during the COVID-19 Pandemic vs. Previous Years: A Preliminary Report.新冠疫情期间与往年相比日本交通事故情况评估:初步报告
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 May 6;10(5):860. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10050860.
健康状况与失眠、心理健康及预防行为之间的关联:对新冠病毒的恐惧的中介作用
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2020 Oct 26;6:2333721420966081. doi: 10.1177/2333721420966081. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
4
Towards activity-based exposure measures in spatial analysis of pedestrian-motor vehicle crashes.面向行人-机动车碰撞空间分析的基于活动的暴露测量。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Dec;148:105777. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105777. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
5
Mobile phone data for informing public health actions across the COVID-19 pandemic life cycle.用于在新冠疫情生命周期内为公共卫生行动提供信息的手机数据。
Sci Adv. 2020 Jun 5;6(23):eabc0764. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc0764. eCollection 2020 Jun.
6
The effect of human mobility and control measures on the COVID-19 epidemic in China.人口流动和防控措施对中国 COVID-19 疫情的影响。
Science. 2020 May 1;368(6490):493-497. doi: 10.1126/science.abb4218. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
7
Bayesian spatial-temporal model for the main and interaction effects of roadway and weather characteristics on freeway crash incidence.贝叶斯时空模型在高速公路事故发生率中道路和天气特征的主效应和交互效应中的应用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Nov;132:105249. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.07.025. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
8
Cyclists injured in traffic crashes in Hong Kong: A call for action.香港交通事故中受伤的自行车骑手:呼吁采取行动。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 9;14(8):e0220785. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220785. eCollection 2019.
9
Evaluation of surrogate measures for pedestrian trips at intersections and crash modeling.交叉口行人生理指标评估与事故建模。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Sep;130:91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.05.015. Epub 2018 May 31.
10
Rethinking safety in numbers: are intersections with more crossing pedestrians really safer?重新思考数量与安全的关系:有更多行人穿越的路口真的更安全吗?
Inj Prev. 2019 Feb;25(1):20-25. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2017-042469. Epub 2017 Oct 27.