Researcher, Department of Women's and Children's Health, and the Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Researcher, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):1881208. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2021.1881208.
This study assessed the effectiveness of a school-based stigma-reduction intervention focusing on stigmatising attitudes towards girls associated with abortion and contraceptive use. In February 2017, two gender-mixed secondary schools ( = 1368) in peri-urban areas of Kisumu County, Kenya, were assigned to receive either an 8-hour stigma-reduction intervention over four sessions (intervention school: IS) or standard comprehensive sexuality education (control school: CS). A classroom survey entailing two five-point Likert scales - the 18-item Adolescents Stigmatizing Attitudes, Beliefs and Actions (ASABA) scale, which measures abortion stigma, and the seven-item Contraceptive Use Stigma (CUS) scale - was conducted to collect data at baseline, 1-month and 12-months after the intervention. The intervention was to be considered effective if a mean score reduction of 25% was achieved for both the ASABA (primary outcome) and the CUS (secondary outcome) at the IS between baseline and 12-month follow-up. 1207 (IS = 574; CS = 633) students were included in analyses at 1-month follow-up, and 693 (IS = 323; CS = 370) at 12-months (the final-year students had left school). A decrease in mean score on both scales was observed at 1-month at both schools. At 12-months, the score decrease was 30.1% at the IS and 9.0% at the CS for ASABA, and 27.3% at the IS and 7.9% at the CS for CUS. At the IS, the score decrease for ASABA between baseline and 12-months was 23.3% among girls and 31.2% among boys; for CUS, the decrease was 27.3% and 24.3%, respectively. ASABA and CUS were positively correlated ( = 0.543; < 0.001), implying a broader perspective on reproductive stigma. A four-session, school-based stigma-reduction intervention could lead to transformed values and attitudes towards gender norms among adolescents regarding abortion and contraceptive use. Stigma associated with abortion and contraception should become a priority for high-quality CSE programmes.
本研究评估了一项以学校为基础的减少耻辱感干预措施的效果,该措施侧重于与堕胎和避孕使用相关的针对女孩的耻辱化态度。2017 年 2 月,肯尼亚基苏木县城乡结合部的两所男女混合的中学( = 1368)被分配接受四节课时的 8 小时减少耻辱感干预(干预学校:IS)或标准综合性行为教育(对照学校:CS)。进行了一项课堂调查,涉及两个五分制李克特量表 - 18 项青少年耻辱化态度、信念和行为量表(ASABA),用于衡量堕胎耻辱感,以及 7 项避孕使用耻辱量表(CUS) - 在干预前、1 个月和 12 个月后收集数据。如果干预学校在基线和 12 个月随访之间,ASABA(主要结果)和 CUS(次要结果)的平均得分降低 25%,则认为干预是有效的。在 1 个月随访时,共有 1207 名学生(IS = 574;CS = 633)纳入分析,在 12 个月时,共有 693 名学生(IS = 323;CS = 370)纳入分析(最后一年的学生已毕业)。两所学校在 1 个月时均观察到两个量表的平均得分下降。在 12 个月时,IS 组的 ASABA 得分下降 30.1%,CS 组下降 9.0%;IS 组的 CUS 得分下降 27.3%,CS 组下降 7.9%。在 IS 组中,基线和 12 个月时,ASABA 得分的下降在女孩中为 23.3%,在男孩中为 31.2%;CUS 分别下降 27.3%和 24.3%。ASABA 和 CUS 呈正相关( = 0.543; < 0.001),意味着对生殖耻辱感有更广泛的看法。四节课时的以学校为基础的减少耻辱感干预措施可以导致青少年对堕胎和避孕使用的性别规范的价值观和态度发生转变。与堕胎和避孕相关的耻辱感应该成为高质量 CSE 计划的优先事项。