• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病患者血糖监测相关痛苦测量方法的开发与验证

Development and Validation of a Distress Measurement Related to Glucose Monitoring of Diabetes Patients.

作者信息

Choi Eujin, Kim Sooyeon, Cho Juhee, Kim Min-Sun, Kwon Eun Kyung, Kim Youngha, Kang Danbee, Cho Sung Yoon

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.

Department of Clinical Research Design and Evaluation, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Diabetes Ther. 2023 Apr;14(4):737-748. doi: 10.1007/s13300-023-01383-8. Epub 2023 Mar 1.

DOI:10.1007/s13300-023-01383-8
PMID:36857024
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10064357/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Glucose monitoring-related problems affect the social and psychological distress experienced by patients with diabetes, and this distress leads to low compliance. Consequently, it is important to be able to comprehensively assess distress due to glucose monitoring in these patients. We have developed and validated a distress of self-glucose monitoring (DSGM) scale instrument to assess patient distress from glucose monitoring.

METHODS

Following an extensive literature review and qualitative study, we selected 21 items for assessing the DSGM, including physical, psychosocial, and process domains. We conducted a cross-sectional study in patients with insulin-treated diabetes aged 10-40 years at Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, from April 2021 to September 2021. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were performed to confirm the structural validity of the DSGM scale. To confirm construct and criterion validity, we assumed that the Korean version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID-K) instrument, life interference, and stress due to glucose monitoring might moderately correlate with the total score and scores of all domains of the DSGM scale except for the physical domain.

RESULTS

Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the DSGM scale were 0.92, and Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the three subscales ranged from 0.69 to 0.92, indicating satisfactory internal consistency. The DSGM scale was evaluated using CFA, and the fit indices for this model were good. The PAID-K total score, life interference, and stress due to glucose monitoring were moderately correlated with the total score of the DSGM scale and with the scores of the psychosocial and process domains, and were weakly correlated with the score of the physical domain of the DSGM scale.

CONCLUSION

The DSGM scale is a valid and reliable tool to evaluate distress due to glucose monitoring in adults, adolescents, and children with diabetes.

摘要

引言

与血糖监测相关的问题会影响糖尿病患者所经历的社会和心理困扰,而这种困扰会导致依从性降低。因此,能够全面评估这些患者因血糖监测而产生的困扰非常重要。我们开发并验证了一种自我血糖监测困扰(DSGM)量表工具,以评估患者因血糖监测而产生的困扰。

方法

在广泛的文献综述和定性研究之后,我们选择了21个项目来评估DSGM,包括身体、心理社会和过程领域。2021年4月至2021年9月,我们在韩国首尔三星医疗中心对10至40岁接受胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者进行了一项横断面研究。进行探索性和验证性因素分析(CFA)以确认DSGM量表的结构效度。为了确认结构效度和标准效度,我们假设糖尿病问题领域韩国版(PAID-K)工具、生活干扰以及血糖监测引起的压力可能与DSGM量表除身体领域外的所有领域的总分及分数呈中度相关。

结果

DSGM量表的Cronbach's alpha系数为0.92,三个子量表的Cronbach's alpha系数在0.69至0.92之间,表明内部一致性令人满意。使用CFA对DSGM量表进行评估,该模型的拟合指数良好。PAID-K总分、生活干扰以及血糖监测引起的压力与DSGM量表的总分以及心理社会和过程领域的分数呈中度相关,与DSGM量表身体领域的分数呈弱相关。

结论

DSGM量表是评估糖尿病成人、青少年和儿童因血糖监测而产生困扰的有效且可靠的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de84/10064357/a1b34b378fbb/13300_2023_1383_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de84/10064357/85a8f92b1485/13300_2023_1383_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de84/10064357/a1b34b378fbb/13300_2023_1383_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de84/10064357/85a8f92b1485/13300_2023_1383_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de84/10064357/a1b34b378fbb/13300_2023_1383_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of a Distress Measurement Related to Glucose Monitoring of Diabetes Patients.糖尿病患者血糖监测相关痛苦测量方法的开发与验证
Diabetes Ther. 2023 Apr;14(4):737-748. doi: 10.1007/s13300-023-01383-8. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
2
Development and validation of a distress measurement for insulin injections among patients with diabetes.开发并验证一种用于测量糖尿病患者胰岛素注射所致痛苦的量表。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 20;13(1):11725. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38982-1.
3
The Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) scale: psychometric evaluation survey in a Greek sample with type 2 diabetes.糖尿病问题领域(PAID)量表:希腊2型糖尿病样本的心理测量评估调查
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2014 May;21(4):345-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2012.01875.x. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
4
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale (SG-PAID-C) among high-risk polypharmacy patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes in Singapore.新加坡2型糖尿病控制不佳的高风险多重用药患者中糖尿病问题领域量表中文版(SG-PAID-C)的心理测量特性。
J Diabetes Investig. 2017 Mar;8(2):235-242. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12556. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
5
Psychrometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale in Primary Care.《初级保健中糖尿病问题领域量表阿拉伯文版的比湿焓性质》
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 25;10:843164. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.843164. eCollection 2022.
6
Psychometric evaluation of the Arabic version of the 5-item Problem Areas in Diabetes (AR-PAID-5) scale.5 项糖尿病问题领域量表(AR-PAID-5)阿拉伯文版的心理测量学评估。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jun 9;23(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01758-z.
7
Inventory of Determinants of Obesity-Related Behaviors in Adolescents: Development and Psychometric Characteristics.青少年肥胖相关行为决定因素清单:编制与心理测量学特征
Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Jul 1;13(3):e24618. doi: 10.5812/ijem.24618v2. eCollection 2015 Jul.
8
Psychometric validation of the Korean version of PROMIS 29 Profile V2.1 among patients with lower extremity problems.下肢问题患者中韩文版PROMIS 29简表V2.1的心理测量学验证
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2021 Nov 24;13(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13102-021-00374-1.
9
[Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life].《韩国版更年期特异性生活质量的有效性和可靠性》
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2020 Jun;50(3):487-500. doi: 10.4040/jkan.20049.
10
Psychometric validation of the Korean Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29 Profile V2.1 among patients with chronic pulmonary diseases.韩国患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)-29简表V2.1在慢性肺病患者中的心理测量学验证
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Oct;13(10):5752-5764. doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-591.

本文引用的文献

1
Demographic and diagnostic markers in new onset pediatric type 1 and type 2 diabetes: differences and overlaps.新诊断的儿童1型和2型糖尿病的人口统计学及诊断标志物:差异与重叠
Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Jun;27(2):121-125. doi: 10.6065/apem.2142170.085. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
2
Insulin Injection Practice and Injection Complications - Results from the Bangladesh Insulin Injection Technique Survey.胰岛素注射实践与注射并发症——孟加拉国胰岛素注射技术调查结果
Eur Endocrinol. 2020 Apr;16(1):41-48. doi: 10.17925/EE.2020.16.1.41. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
3
Initial experiences of adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes and high-risk glycemic control after starting flash glucose monitoring - a qualitative study.
1型糖尿病青少年和青年开始使用动态血糖监测后血糖控制高危的初步体验——一项定性研究
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2019 Dec 7;19(1):37-46. doi: 10.1007/s40200-019-00472-5. eCollection 2020 Jun.
4
The Diabetes and Emotional Health Handbook and Toolkit for Health Professionals Supporting Adults With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: Formative Evaluation.面向为1型和2型糖尿病成人患者提供支持的医疗专业人员的糖尿病与情绪健康手册及工具包:形成性评估
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Feb 21;4(2):e15007. doi: 10.2196/15007.
5
ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Glycemic control targets and glucose monitoring for children, adolescents, and young adults with diabetes.国际儿童青少年糖尿病研究学会2018年临床实践共识指南:糖尿病儿童、青少年及青年的血糖控制目标与血糖监测
Pediatr Diabetes. 2018 Oct;19 Suppl 27:105-114. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12737.
6
Adoption Barriers for Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Their Potential Reduction With a Fully Implanted System: Results From Patient Preference Surveys.持续葡萄糖监测的采用障碍及其通过完全植入式系统的潜在降低:患者偏好调查结果
Clin Diabetes. 2018 Jan;36(1):50-58. doi: 10.2337/cd17-0053.
7
The effect of free diabetes care on metabolic control and on health-related quality of life among youths with type 1 diabetes in Cameroon.免费糖尿病护理对喀麦隆1型糖尿病青少年代谢控制及健康相关生活质量的影响。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2017 Jun 30;5(1):e000397. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2017-000397. eCollection 2017.
8
How to assess diabetes distress: comparison of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID) and the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS).如何评估糖尿病困扰:糖尿病问题领域量表(PAID)与糖尿病困扰量表(DDS)的比较
Diabet Med. 2016 Jun;33(6):835-43. doi: 10.1111/dme.12887. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
9
Development of a New Measure for Assessing Glucose Monitoring Device-Related Treatment Satisfaction and Quality of Life.一种用于评估血糖监测设备相关治疗满意度和生活质量的新测量方法的开发。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Sep;17(9):657-63. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0417. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
10
Adherence to glycemic monitoring in diabetes.糖尿病患者对血糖监测的依从性。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 May;9(3):668-75. doi: 10.1177/1932296814567709. Epub 2015 Jan 14.