• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《初级保健中糖尿病问题领域量表阿拉伯文版的比湿焓性质》

Psychrometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale in Primary Care.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.

Department of Public Health, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 25;10:843164. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.843164. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.843164
PMID:35284366
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8913881/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) scale is a reliable and valid tool that is widely used for diabetes-distress screening, but the Arabic version of the scale lacks validity and reliability analysis in primary healthcare (PHC) patients. Our study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the PAID (AR-PAID) scale among Egyptian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in PHC settings.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study on a convenience sample of 200 patients from six rural PHC settings in the Ismailia governorate. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to test the goodness-of-fit to the predefined models of the PAID. Convergent construct was evaluated through correlations with the Arabic versions of the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7), and 5-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5), additionally glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. Discriminant validity was evaluated through associations with patients' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Reliability was evaluated through internal consistency (Cronbach's α) and test-retest reliability analysis (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC).

RESULTS

The CFA demonstrated the best fit for a four-factor model. The AR-PAID was significantly correlated with the following measures: PHQ-9 (rho = 0.71, < 0.001), GAD-7 (rho = 0.50, < 0.001), WHO-5 (rho = -0.69, < 0.001), and HbA1c (rho = 0.36, < 0.001), supporting sound convergent validity. Discriminant validity was satisfactory demonstrated. Internal consistency was excellent (α = 0.96) and test-retest reliability was stable (ICC = 0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

The AR-PAID scale is a valid and reliable instrument for diabetes-distress screening in primary care patients with T2DM that can be used in clinical settings and research. Further research is needed to validate short forms of the AR-PAID scale.

摘要

背景

Problem Areas in Diabetes(PAID)量表是一种可靠且有效的工具,广泛用于糖尿病困扰的筛查,但该量表的阿拉伯语版本在基层医疗保健(PHC)患者中缺乏有效性和可靠性分析。我们的研究旨在评估 PAID 量表阿拉伯语版本(AR-PAID)在埃及 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)PHC 患者中的心理测量特性。

方法

我们对来自伊斯梅利亚省六个农村 PHC 环境的 200 名患者进行了横断面研究。通过验证性因子分析(CFA)对 PAID 的预定义模型进行拟合优度测试。通过与阿拉伯语版本的患者健康问卷 9 项(PHQ-9)、广泛性焦虑症量表(GAD-7)和 5 项世界卫生组织幸福感指数(WHO-5)以及糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平的相关性来评估聚合结构。通过与患者的社会人口统计学和临床特征的相关性来评估判别有效性。通过内部一致性(Cronbach's α)和测试-重测可靠性分析(组内相关系数,ICC)来评估可靠性。

结果

CFA 表明四因素模型拟合最好。AR-PAID 与以下措施显著相关:PHQ-9(rho = 0.71,<0.001)、GAD-7(rho = 0.50,<0.001)、WHO-5(rho = -0.69,<0.001)和 HbA1c(rho = 0.36,<0.001),支持良好的聚合有效性。判别有效性令人满意。内部一致性很好(α=0.96),重测可靠性稳定(ICC=0.97)。

结论

AR-PAID 量表是一种有效的、可靠的 T2DM PHC 患者糖尿病困扰筛查工具,可用于临床和研究。需要进一步研究来验证 AR-PAID 量表的简短形式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3b2/8913881/2986fdf5e044/fpubh-10-843164-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3b2/8913881/2986fdf5e044/fpubh-10-843164-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3b2/8913881/2986fdf5e044/fpubh-10-843164-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychrometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale in Primary Care.《初级保健中糖尿病问题领域量表阿拉伯文版的比湿焓性质》
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 25;10:843164. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.843164. eCollection 2022.
2
Psychometric evaluation of the Arabic version of the 5-item Problem Areas in Diabetes (AR-PAID-5) scale.5 项糖尿病问题领域量表(AR-PAID-5)阿拉伯文版的心理测量学评估。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jun 9;23(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01758-z.
3
Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the short form of The Problem Areas in Diabetes scale (PAID-5): a validation study.《糖尿病问题领域量表短式 5 项版(PAID-5)挪威语版的心理测量学特性:验证研究》。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 21;9(2):e022903. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022903.
4
Validation and Cultural Adaptation of the Problem Areas in Diabetes-5 (PAID-5) Scale to European Portuguese.糖尿病问题领域量表(PAID-5)在欧洲葡萄牙语中的效度验证与文化调适
Acta Med Port. 2024 Jan 3;37(1):36-41. doi: 10.20344/amp.18995.
5
Psychometric properties of screening questionnaires to detect depression in primary healthcare setting in rural Ethiopia.用于在埃塞俄比亚农村初级医疗保健环境中检测抑郁症的筛查问卷的心理计量学特性。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jun 2;23(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01755-2.
6
Measurement of diabetes-related emotional distress using the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale: psychometric evaluations show that the short form is better than the full form.使用糖尿病问题领域量表测量糖尿病相关情绪困扰:心理测量学评估表明,简表比完整版更好。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Oct 29;12:142. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0142-z.
7
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale (SG-PAID-C) among high-risk polypharmacy patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes in Singapore.新加坡2型糖尿病控制不佳的高风险多重用药患者中糖尿病问题领域量表中文版(SG-PAID-C)的心理测量特性。
J Diabetes Investig. 2017 Mar;8(2):235-242. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12556. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
8
The reliability, validity and factorial structure of the Swahili version of the 7-item generalized anxiety disorder scale (GAD-7) among adults living with HIV from Kilifi, Kenya.肯尼亚基利菲地区感染艾滋病毒的成年人中,斯瓦希里语版7项广泛性焦虑症量表(GAD-7)的信度、效度和因子结构。
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 28;19:62. doi: 10.1186/s12991-020-00312-4. eCollection 2020.
9
Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the 12-item diabetes fatalism scale.12项糖尿病宿命论量表阿拉伯语版本的心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 11;13(1):e0190719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190719. eCollection 2018.
10
Developing and psychometric testing of a short-form problem areas in diabetes scale in chinese patients.中文患者简易糖尿病问题领域量表的编制及心理测量学检验。
J Nurs Res. 2013 Sep;21(3):212-8. doi: 10.1097/01.jnr.0000432048.31921.e2.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric evaluation of the problem areas in diabetes (PAID) scale among people with type 2 diabetes in Ethiopia: a tool validation study.埃塞俄比亚2型糖尿病患者糖尿病问题领域(PAID)量表的心理测量评估:一项工具验证研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2025 Apr 9;18(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s13104-025-07238-8.
2
What is well-being? A scoping review of the conceptual and operational definitions of occupational well-being.什么是幸福?对职业幸福的概念和操作定义的范围综述。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Oct 16;7(1):e227. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.648. eCollection 2023.
3
Prevalence and Associated Factors of Diabetes Distress, Depression and Anxiety Among Primary Care Patients With Type 2 Diabetes During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Egypt: A Cross-Sectional Study.

本文引用的文献

1
PAID-PL-The Polish Version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale: Perfect Reliability and a One-Factor Structure.付费PL-糖尿病量表问题领域的波兰语版本:完美的信度和单因素结构。
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2021 Nov 2;14:4433-4441. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S322850. eCollection 2021.
2
Cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Kinyarwanda version of the problem areas in diabetes (PAID) questionnaire.卢旺达语版糖尿病问题领域(PAID)问卷的文化调适和心理计量学评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Jul 22;19(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01821-w.
3
Abridged for Primary Care Providers.
埃及2型糖尿病初级护理患者在新冠疫情期间糖尿病困扰、抑郁和焦虑的患病率及相关因素:一项横断面研究
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 3;13:937973. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.937973. eCollection 2022.
4
Psychometric evaluation of the Arabic version of the 5-item Problem Areas in Diabetes (AR-PAID-5) scale.5 项糖尿病问题领域量表(AR-PAID-5)阿拉伯文版的心理测量学评估。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jun 9;23(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01758-z.
为初级保健提供者缩写。
Clin Diabetes. 2020 Jan;38(1):10-38. doi: 10.2337/cd20-as01.
4
Assessing Diabetes Distress Among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Malaysia Using the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale.使用糖尿病问题量表评估马来西亚2型糖尿病患者的糖尿病困扰
Value Health Reg Issues. 2019 May;18:159-164. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 May 10.
5
Addressing diabetes distress in clinical care: a practical guide.解决临床护理中的糖尿病困扰:实用指南。
Diabet Med. 2019 Jul;36(7):803-812. doi: 10.1111/dme.13967. Epub 2019 May 7.
6
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer.健康、社会和行为研究量表开发与验证的最佳实践:入门指南。
Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149. eCollection 2018.
7
An arabic translation, reliability, and validation of Patient Health Questionnaire in a Saudi sample.《患者健康问卷》在沙特样本中的阿拉伯语翻译、信效度验证
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2017 Sep 6;16:32. doi: 10.1186/s12991-017-0155-1. eCollection 2017.
8
The prevalence of diabetes-specific emotional distress in people with Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.2 型糖尿病患者糖尿病特异性情绪困扰的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabet Med. 2017 Nov;34(11):1508-1520. doi: 10.1111/dme.13448. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
9
What is the best measure for assessing diabetes distress? A comparison of the Problem Areas in Diabetes and Diabetes Distress Scale: results from Diabetes MILES-Australia.评估糖尿病困扰的最佳指标是什么?对糖尿病问题领域和糖尿病困扰量表的比较:来自澳大利亚糖尿病 MILES 的结果。
J Health Psychol. 2018 Apr;23(5):667-680. doi: 10.1177/1359105316642006. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
10
Psychometric Properties of the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Instrument in Singapore.新加坡糖尿病问题领域量表(PAID)的心理测量特性
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 3;10(9):e0136759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136759. eCollection 2015.