• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病问题领域(PAID)量表:希腊2型糖尿病样本的心理测量评估调查

The Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) scale: psychometric evaluation survey in a Greek sample with type 2 diabetes.

作者信息

Papathanasiou A, Koutsovasilis A, Shea S, Philalithis A, Papavasiliou S, Melidonis A, Lionis C

机构信息

Health Medical Center of Stylida, Lamia Diabetes Centre 'Tzaneio' General Hospital of Piraeus, Piraeus Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes Mellitus and Diseases of Metabolism, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2014 May;21(4):345-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2012.01875.x. Epub 2012 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2850.2012.01875.x
PMID:22340071
Abstract

Several instruments have been developed for the assessment of emotional distress in patients with diabetes. The Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID) is a brief self-report scale that evaluates diabetes-related distress. There is a lack of validated instruments for the evaluation of psychological aspects in patients with diabetes in Greek language. The current study was conducted to translate and adapt the PAID scale in Greek language and to evaluate the psychometric properties in two different study populations of patients with diabetes. The aim of this study was to translate the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) scale into Greek, adapt it culturally to Greece and determine its psychometric properties. The translation process included two forward translations, reconciliation, backward translation and pre-testing steps. The validation incorporated the exploration of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), test-retest reliability (interclass correlation coefficient), construct validity (exploratory factor analysis) and responsiveness (Spearman correlation coefficient). Participants included 101 consecutive patients from a rural primary healthcare centre and 101 patients from an urban hospital. All patients completed the PAID scale and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) version 2. Internal consistency considered good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.948). Interclass correlation coefficient was 0.942 (95% CI 0.915-0.961). Factor analysis yielded three factors: 'Diabetes-related emotional problems' (51.79% variance, Cronbach's alpha = 0.910), 'Food-related problems' (9.55% variance, Cronbach's alpha = 0.824) and 'Social support-related problems' (5.96% variance, Cronbach's alpha = 0.704). Screen plot test and conceptual congruency of items supported a three-factor solution. Total PAID showed a negative correlation with both SF-36 mental component summary (r = -0.733, P < 0.0001) and SF-36 physical component summary (r = -0.594, P < 0.0001). Our findings indicate that the Greek version of the PAID questionnaire is reliable and valid for patients with diabetes mellitus in Greece.

摘要

已经开发出几种用于评估糖尿病患者情绪困扰的工具。糖尿病问题领域量表(PAID)是一种简短的自评量表,用于评估与糖尿病相关的困扰。希腊语中缺乏用于评估糖尿病患者心理方面的经过验证的工具。本研究旨在将PAID量表翻译成希腊语并进行改编,并在两个不同的糖尿病患者研究人群中评估其心理测量特性。本研究的目的是将糖尿病问题领域(PAID)量表翻译成希腊语,在文化上使其适应希腊,并确定其心理测量特性。翻译过程包括两次正向翻译、核对、反向翻译和预测试步骤。验证包括探索内部一致性(克朗巴哈系数)、重测信度(组内相关系数)、结构效度(探索性因素分析)和反应性(斯皮尔曼相关系数)。参与者包括来自农村初级医疗中心的101名连续患者和来自城市医院的101名患者。所有患者都完成了PAID量表和简短健康调查简表(SF-36)第2版。内部一致性良好(克朗巴哈系数=0.948)。组内相关系数为0.942(95%CI 0.915-0.961)。因素分析产生了三个因素:“与糖尿病相关的情绪问题”(方差51.79%,克朗巴哈系数=0.910)、“与食物相关的问题”(方差9.55%,克朗巴哈系数=0.824)和“与社会支持相关的问题”(方差5.96%,克朗巴哈系数=0.704)。碎石图检验和项目的概念一致性支持三因素解决方案。PAID总分与SF-36心理成分总结(r=-0.733,P<0.0001)和SF-36身体成分总结(r=-0.594,P<0.0001)均呈负相关。我们的研究结果表明,PAID问卷的希腊语版本对希腊的糖尿病患者是可靠且有效的。

相似文献

1
The Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) scale: psychometric evaluation survey in a Greek sample with type 2 diabetes.糖尿病问题领域(PAID)量表:希腊2型糖尿病样本的心理测量评估调查
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2014 May;21(4):345-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2012.01875.x. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
2
The psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (Swe-PAID-20): scale development.糖尿病问题领域量表瑞典语版(Swe-PAID-20)的心理测量特性:量表编制
Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Sep;45(9):1319-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.09.010. Epub 2007 Nov 5.
3
Assessing self-efficacy in type 2 diabetes management: validation of the Italian version of the Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale (IT-DMSES).评估 2 型糖尿病管理中的自我效能感:糖尿病管理自我效能量表(IT-DMSES)意大利版本的验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Apr 23;16(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0901-3.
4
Diabetes-related emotional distress in adults: reliability and validity of the Norwegian versions of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID) and the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS).成人糖尿病相关情绪困扰:糖尿病问题区域量表(PAID)和糖尿病困扰量表(DDS)挪威语版本的信度和效度。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Feb;49(2):174-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.08.007. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
5
Adaptation and validation of the Distress Scale for Mexican patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension: a cross-sectional survey.墨西哥2型糖尿病和高血压患者痛苦量表的改编与验证:一项横断面调查
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 2;6(3):e009723. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009723.
6
Development and validation of the Chinese version of the Diabetes Management Self-efficacy Scale.中文版糖尿病管理自我效能量表的编制与验证
Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Apr;45(4):534-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.08.020. Epub 2006 Oct 19.
7
Measurement of diabetes-related emotional distress using the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale: psychometric evaluations show that the short form is better than the full form.使用糖尿病问题领域量表测量糖尿病相关情绪困扰:心理测量学评估表明,简表比完整版更好。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Oct 29;12:142. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0142-z.
8
Validity and reliability of the Greek Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ Version 2.1-GR).希腊偏头痛特异性生活质量问卷(MSQ 版本 2.1-GR)的有效性和可靠性。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Jul 15;8(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00762-4.
9
Validation of the Italian version of the WHO-Well-Being Questionnaire (WHO-WBQ) and the WHO-Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (WHO-DTSQ).世界卫生组织幸福问卷(WHO-WBQ)意大利语版本及世界卫生组织糖尿病治疗满意度问卷(WHO-DTSQ)的验证
Diabetes Nutr Metab. 2004 Aug;17(4):235-43.
10
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) for people with chronic mental illness: scale development.慢性精神疾病患者康复评估量表(RAS)的日语版的信度和效度:量表编制。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Mar;47(3):314-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric evaluation of the problem areas in diabetes (PAID) scale among people with type 2 diabetes in Ethiopia: a tool validation study.埃塞俄比亚2型糖尿病患者糖尿病问题领域(PAID)量表的心理测量评估:一项工具验证研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2025 Apr 9;18(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s13104-025-07238-8.
2
Short version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale(PAID-13) in Brazilian patients with diabetes: a structural and criterion validity study.巴西糖尿病患者糖尿病问题领域简短量表(PAID - 13):一项结构效度和效标效度研究
Sao Paulo Med J. 2025 Mar 14;143(2):e2024109. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2024.0109.R1.03072024. eCollection 2025.
3
Integrating literature and family insights: exploring the needs of families supporting adults with diabetes.
整合文献与家庭见解:探索支持成年糖尿病患者家庭的需求。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 8;12:1473723. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1473723. eCollection 2024.
4
Measuring job stress of dental workers in China during the COVID-19 pandemic: reliability and validity of the hospital consultants' job stress questionnaire.测量 COVID-19 大流行期间中国牙科工作者的工作压力:医院顾问工作压力问卷的信度和效度。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 2;24(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05670-x.
5
Validity of the short-form five-item Problem Area in Diabetes questionnaire as a depression screening tool in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.简短五项糖尿病问题区问卷作为 2 型糖尿病患者抑郁筛查工具的有效性。
J Diabetes Investig. 2023 Sep;14(9):1128-1135. doi: 10.1111/jdi.14051. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
6
Cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Kinyarwanda version of the diabetes-39 (D-39) questionnaire.《卢旺达语版糖尿病 39 项量表(D-39)问卷的文化调适与心理计量学评估》。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Aug 16;20(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-02034-5.
7
Patient-reported outcome measures for assessing health-related quality of life in people with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review.患者报告结局测量在评估 2 型糖尿病患者健康相关生活质量中的应用:一项系统评价。
Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2022 Oct;23(5):931-977. doi: 10.1007/s11154-022-09734-9. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
8
Psychometric evaluation of the Arabic version of the 5-item Problem Areas in Diabetes (AR-PAID-5) scale.5 项糖尿病问题领域量表(AR-PAID-5)阿拉伯文版的心理测量学评估。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jun 9;23(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01758-z.
9
Psychrometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale in Primary Care.《初级保健中糖尿病问题领域量表阿拉伯文版的比湿焓性质》
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 25;10:843164. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.843164. eCollection 2022.
10
Reliability and Validity of General Health Questionnaire-12 in Chinese Dental Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间中文版一般健康问卷-12在中国牙科医护人员中的信效度研究
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 18;12:792838. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.792838. eCollection 2021.