• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Racial differences in prevention decision making among U.S. women at high risk of breast cancer: A qualitative study.美国高乳腺癌风险女性预防决策中的种族差异:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 1;18(3):e0278742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278742. eCollection 2023.
2
Layers of information: interacting constraints on breast cancer risk-management by high-risk African American women.信息层叠:高危非裔美国女性乳腺癌风险管理的相互制约因素。
Ethn Health. 2021 Aug;26(6):787-810. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2018.1562053. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
3
What factors influence the treatment decisions of women with breast cancer? Does residential location play a role?哪些因素会影响乳腺癌女性的治疗决策?居住地点会有影响吗?
Rural Remote Health. 2019 May;19(2):4497. doi: 10.22605/RRH4497. Epub 2019 May 27.
4
The decision-making journey of malaysian women with early breast cancer: a qualitative study.马来西亚早期乳腺癌女性的决策历程:一项定性研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(12):7143-7. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.12.7143.
5
The role of patient-provider communication for black women making decisions about breast cancer treatment.患者与医生沟通在黑人女性决定乳腺癌治疗方案中的作用。
Psychooncology. 2011 Dec;20(12):1309-16. doi: 10.1002/pon.1852. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
6
Perceptions of Racially and Ethnically Diverse Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer Regarding the Use of a Web-Based Decision Aid for Chemoprevention: Qualitative Study Nested Within a Randomized Controlled Trial.高乳腺癌风险的不同种族和民族的女性对使用基于网络的化学预防决策辅助工具的看法:随机对照试验中嵌套的定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 8;23(6):e23839. doi: 10.2196/23839.
7
Women's experiences of health care providers when choosing flat closure after breast cancer: An interview study.女性在选择乳腺癌术后乳房平坦闭合时对医护人员的体验:一项访谈研究。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2024 Jun;70:102613. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102613. Epub 2024 May 21.
8
Understanding low chemoprevention uptake by women at high risk of breast cancer: findings from a qualitative inductive study of women's risk-reduction experiences.了解高乳腺癌风险女性对化学预防措施的低接受度:基于女性风险降低经验的定性归纳研究结果。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Apr 16;21(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01279-4.
9
Decision-making process for breast-conserving therapy from the perspective of women with breast cancer: A grounded theory study.从乳腺癌女性的角度看保乳治疗的决策过程:扎根理论研究。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2023 Oct;66:102375. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2023.102375. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
10
In the moment: women speak about surgical treatment decision making days after a breast cancer diagnosis.当下:乳腺癌确诊数日后女性讲述手术治疗决策过程
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009 Sep;36(5):E257-65. doi: 10.1188/09.ONF.E257-E265.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving communication to increase uptake of high-risk breast cancer prevention appointments: Building a better letter.改善沟通以提高高危乳腺癌预防预约的接受率:撰写更好的信函。
PEC Innov. 2024 Nov 6;5:100354. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100354. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.
2
Risk-management decision-making data from a community-based sample of racially diverse women at high risk of breast cancer: rationale, methods, and sample characteristics of the Daughter Sister Mother Project survey.基于社区的、种族多样的乳腺癌高风险女性样本的风险管理决策数据:女儿姐妹母亲项目调查的基本原理、方法和样本特征。
Breast Cancer Res. 2024 Jan 11;26(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13058-023-01753-x.
3
Understanding low chemoprevention uptake by women at high risk of breast cancer: findings from a qualitative inductive study of women's risk-reduction experiences.了解高乳腺癌风险女性对化学预防措施的低接受度:基于女性风险降低经验的定性归纳研究结果。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Apr 16;21(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01279-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Financial constraints on genetic counseling and further risk-management decisions among U.S. women at elevated breast cancer risk.美国高乳腺癌风险女性在遗传咨询和进一步风险管理决策方面的财务限制。
J Genet Couns. 2021 Oct;30(5):1452-1467. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1413. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
2
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 1.2020.NCCN 指南解读:遗传/家族性高风险评估:乳腺、卵巢和胰腺,第 1.2020 版。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020 Apr;18(4):380-391. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0017.
3
Spiritual health locus of control and life satisfaction among African American breast cancer survivors.非裔美国乳腺癌幸存者的精神健康控制源和生活满意度。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2020 May-Jun;38(3):343-357. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2019.1692988. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
4
Health and Racial Disparity in Breast Cancer.乳腺癌的健康与种族差异。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1152:31-49. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-20301-6_3.
5
Layers of information: interacting constraints on breast cancer risk-management by high-risk African American women.信息层叠:高危非裔美国女性乳腺癌风险管理的相互制约因素。
Ethn Health. 2021 Aug;26(6):787-810. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2018.1562053. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
6
Views of Low-Income Women of Color at Increased Risk for Breast Cancer.乳腺癌风险增加的低收入有色人种女性的观点。
Narrat Inq Bioeth. 2018;8(1):53-66. doi: 10.1353/nib.2018.0023.
7
Preferences for Communicating about Breast Cancer Screening Among Racially/Ethnically Diverse Older Women.不同种族/族裔的老年女性对乳腺癌筛查交流的偏好。
Health Commun. 2019 Jun;34(7):702-706. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1431026. Epub 2018 Jan 26.
8
Experiencing the cancer of a loved one influences decision-making for breast cancer prevention.亲人患癌会影响乳腺癌预防决策。
J Health Psychol. 2020 Jul;25(8):1064-1075. doi: 10.1177/1359105317746480. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
9
The pervasive crisis of diminishing radiation therapy access for vulnerable populations in the United States, part 1: African-American patients.美国弱势群体放疗可及性不断下降的普遍危机,第1部分:非裔美国患者
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2017 Aug 3;2(4):523-531. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2017.07.002. eCollection 2017 Oct-Dec.
10
Assessment of the effects of decision aids about breast cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.乳腺癌筛查决策辅助工具效果评估:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 6;7(10):e016894. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016894.

美国高乳腺癌风险女性预防决策中的种族差异:一项定性研究。

Racial differences in prevention decision making among U.S. women at high risk of breast cancer: A qualitative study.

机构信息

Division of Health Services Management and Policy at the Ohio State University College of Public Health, and Faculty Affiliate of the James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America.

Division of Health Services Management and Policy at the Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Mar 1;18(3):e0278742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278742. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0278742
PMID:36857397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9977014/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Women at high risk of breast cancer face complex decisions about how to manage those risks. Substantial gaps in current knowledge include how women make these decisions and how decision making may differ across sub-populations. Among these critical gaps are the questions of (a) whether racial differences exist between the experiences of high-risk women navigating breast cancer risk, and (b) what consequences those racial differences might have on women's ability to manage their cancer risks. The present study is designed to address these questions directly.

METHODS

Fifty semi-structured interviews were conducted with high-risk Black (n = 20) and white women (n = 30) between May 2015 and March 2016 in person in Ohio and by phone. Transcribed data were analyzed using grounded theory methods.

MAIN FINDINGS

Our analyses suggest that many of the core decision-making dynamics high-risk women navigate differ by race. The experiences of white and Black women in our study differ in terms of (a) contextualizing risk-how women make sense of their own breast cancer risk, the degree to which they worry about risk, and how they prioritize risk within the contexts of their broader lives; (b) conceptualizing risk management-how, how much, and from whom women learn about and conceptualize their options for preventing cancer and/or ensuring that cancer gets diagnosed early; and (c) constraints-the external barriers women face throughout their decision-making and risk-management processes. In sum, the Black women we interviewed reported feeling less well-situated to consider and cope actively with breast cancer risk, less well-informed about risk-management options, and more constrained in their use of these options.

CONCLUSIONS

High-risk women's accounts of the complex dynamics that shape breast cancer prevention decisions suggest that these dynamics vary substantially by race, such that Black women may experience disadvantages relative to whites.

摘要

目的

患有乳腺癌高风险的女性在如何管理这些风险方面面临着复杂的决策。目前知识存在很大差距,包括女性如何做出这些决策以及决策在不同亚人群中可能存在差异。这些关键差距包括:(a)在高风险女性探索乳腺癌风险的经历中是否存在种族差异,以及(b)这些种族差异可能对女性管理癌症风险的能力产生哪些后果。本研究旨在直接解决这些问题。

方法

2015 年 5 月至 2016 年 3 月,在俄亥俄州,我们以面对面和电话的方式对 50 名高风险的黑人(n = 20)和白人女性(n = 30)进行了半结构化访谈。使用扎根理论方法分析转录数据。

主要发现

我们的分析表明,高风险女性所面临的许多核心决策动态因种族而异。我们研究中的白人女性和黑人女性的经历在以下方面存在差异:(a)风险情境化——女性如何理解自己的乳腺癌风险、对风险的担忧程度,以及她们如何在更广泛的生活背景下优先考虑风险;(b)风险管理概念化——女性了解和概念化预防癌症和/或确保癌症早期诊断的选择的方式、程度和来源;以及(c)约束——女性在整个决策和风险管理过程中面临的外部障碍。总的来说,我们采访的黑人女性报告说,她们感到自己在考虑和积极应对乳腺癌风险方面的处境较差,对风险管理选择的了解较少,并且在使用这些选择方面受到的限制较多。

结论

高风险女性对塑造乳腺癌预防决策的复杂动态的描述表明,这些动态在很大程度上因种族而异,因此黑人女性可能相对于白人女性处于劣势地位。