Faculty of Medicine, University of Muenster (WWU), Muenster, Germany.
Department of Food, Nutrition, Facilities, University of Applied Sciences Muenster, Corrensstraße 25, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 1;13(1):3486. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-27063-4.
Stress-eating (eating more or more unhealthily in order to accommodate to stress), contributes to the development and maintenance of obesity. The effect of comprehensive weight loss interventions on changes in stress-eating as well as the contributing role of stress-eating on weight reduction has not been examined. The impact of the 8-week intensive phase of the Healthy Lifestyle Community Programme (HLCP, cohort 1) on emotional, external and restrained eating, as expressions of stress-eating was evaluated in a non-randomized controlled trial. Intervention: 14 seminars (twice per week, including practical units), complemented by stress-regulation and cooking workshops and coaching sessions empowering participants to change their behaviour towards a healthy plant-based diet (ad libitum), stress regulation, regular exercise and to focus on social support. Participants were recruited from the general population. In the intervention group, 91 participants (IG; age: 56 ± 10, 77% female) and in the control group, 52 (CG; age: 62 ± 14, 57% female) were enrolled. At baseline, participants of the IG reported higher levels of stress (9.7 ± 5.4 points [P] vs. 7.6 ± 6.2; p < 0.011), and of emotional eating (27.9 ± 9.4 vs. 20.0 ± 7.1; p < 0.001) and external eating (29.1 ± 4.9 vs. 25.5 ± 5.6; p < 0.001) than participants of the CG. Within 8 weeks, in the IG, scores of emotional eating (- 3.5 ± 5.4 P) and external eating significantly decreased (= - 2.0 ± 3.8 P), while restrained eating increased (2.7 ± 5.0 P; p for all < 0.001). Weight change was negatively correlated with change of external eating (R = 0.045; CC = - 0.285; p = 0.014), indicating that a greater weight change was associated with a smaller change of external eating. This is the first study to prospectively investigate the role of stress-eating on the weight reduction effect of comprehensive lifestyle interventions. Our data confirm that overweight is associated with EE and external eating and suggest that the HLCP is capable to reduce both, weight and stress-eating.Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS; reference: DRKS00018821; September 18th 2019; retrospectively registered).
压力性进食(为了应对压力而摄入更多或更不健康的食物)会导致肥胖的发生和维持。综合减肥干预措施对压力性进食变化的影响,以及压力性进食对减肥的贡献作用尚未得到检验。本非随机对照试验评估了 8 周密集期健康生活方式社区计划(HLCP,队列 1)对情绪性、外显性和抑制性进食(作为压力性进食的表现)的影响。干预措施:14 次研讨会(每周两次,包括实践单元),辅以压力调节和烹饪工作坊以及辅导课程,使参与者能够改变他们的行为,以健康的植物性饮食(随意)、压力调节、定期锻炼和关注社会支持。参与者从普通人群中招募。在干预组中,有 91 名参与者(IG;年龄:56±10,77%为女性)和对照组 52 名参与者(CG;年龄:62±14,57%为女性)入组。在基线时,IG 组的参与者报告的压力水平更高(9.7±5.4 分[P] vs. 7.6±6.2;p<0.011),情绪性进食(27.9±9.4 分 vs. 20.0±7.1;p<0.001)和外显性进食(29.1±4.9 分 vs. 25.5±5.6;p<0.001)高于 CG 组。在 8 周内,IG 组的情绪性进食(-3.5±5.4 P)和外显性进食评分显著下降(-2.0±3.8 P),而抑制性进食增加(2.7±5.0 P;p 均<0.001)。体重变化与外显性进食变化呈负相关(R=0.045;CC=-0.285;p=0.014),表明体重变化越大,外显性进食变化越小。这是第一项前瞻性研究综合生活方式干预对体重减轻效果中压力性进食作用的研究。我们的数据证实,超重与 EE 和外显性进食有关,并表明 HLCP 能够同时减轻体重和压力性进食。试验注册:德国临床试验注册处(DRKS;参考:DRKS00018821;2019 年 9 月 18 日;回溯性注册)。