• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情对欧洲从事全球健康工作的高学历女性个人生活和职业生活的影响——一项定性研究

Impact of COVID-19 on the private and professional lives of highly educated women working in global health in Europe-A qualitative study.

作者信息

Hoffmann Christina, Schneider Tamara, Wannous Chadia, Nyberger Karolina, Haavardsson Ingeborg, Gilmore Brynne, Quigley Paula, Winkler Andrea S, Ludwig Sabine

机构信息

Women in Global Health Germany, Charité Center for Global Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Department of Applied Health Sciences, University of Applied Sciences, Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 Feb 13;4:1009473. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1009473. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2023.1009473
PMID:36860347
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9969128/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a deepening of existing inequalities and a rollback of achievements made in gender equality. Women in Global Health (WGH) is a global movement that aims to achieve gender equality in health and increase female leadership in global health. Here, the aim was to understand how the pandemic affects the private and professional lives of women working in global health in different European countries. Suggestions for future pandemic preparedness including how gender perspectives should be integrated into pandemic preparedness and how a women's network such as WGH helped them to overcome the impact of the pandemic were explored.

METHODS

Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted in September 2020 with a sample size of nine highly educated women with a mean age of 42.1 years from the different WGH European chapters. The participants were informed of the study and were formally asked for their consent. The interviews were held in English an online videoconference platform and lasted 20-25 min each. The interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was conducted according to Mayring Qualitative Content Analysis using MAXQDA.

RESULTS

The pandemic has both positive and negative effects on the professional and private lives of women. It led to an increased workload and stress as well as pressure to publish on COVID-19-related themes. Increased childcare and household responsibilities represented a double burden. The available space was limited if other family members were also working from home. Positive aspects included more time for family or partners and reduced travel. The participants report on perceived gender differences in the experience of the pandemic. International cooperation is considered to be a key factor for future pandemic preparedness. Being part of a women's network such as WGH was perceived as being very supportive in difficult situations during the pandemic.

CONCLUSION

This study provides unique insights into the experiences of women working in global health in different European countries. The COVID-19 pandemic influences their professional and private lives. Perceived gender differences are reported and suggest the need for integrating gender perspectives in pandemic preparedness. Networks for women, such as WGH, can facilitate the exchange of information in crises and provide women with professional and personal support.

摘要

背景

新冠疫情导致现有不平等现象加剧,性别平等方面取得的成果出现倒退。全球卫生领域女性组织(WGH)是一项全球行动,旨在实现卫生领域的性别平等,并增加女性在全球卫生领域的领导力。在此,研究目的是了解疫情如何影响不同欧洲国家从事全球卫生工作的女性的私人生活和职业生活。探讨了未来疫情防范的建议,包括如何将性别视角纳入疫情防范,以及像WGH这样的女性网络如何帮助她们克服疫情的影响。

方法

2020年9月,对来自WGH欧洲不同分会的9名受过高等教育、平均年龄42.1岁的女性进行了定性半结构式访谈。向参与者介绍了该研究,并正式征求她们的同意。访谈在一个在线视频会议平台上用英语进行,每次持续20 - 25分钟。访谈进行了录音并逐字转录。根据梅林定性内容分析法,使用MAXQDA进行主题分析。

结果

疫情对女性的职业生活和私人生活既有积极影响,也有消极影响。它导致工作量和压力增加,以及就新冠相关主题发表文章的压力。育儿和家务责任的增加带来了双重负担。如果其他家庭成员也在家工作,可用空间就会有限。积极方面包括有更多时间陪伴家人或伴侣以及减少出行。参与者报告了在疫情经历中察觉到的性别差异。国际合作被认为是未来疫情防范的关键因素。成为像WGH这样的女性网络的一员在疫情期间的困难情况下被认为非常有帮助。

结论

本研究为不同欧洲国家从事全球卫生工作的女性的经历提供了独特见解。新冠疫情影响了她们的职业生活和私人生活。报告了察觉到的性别差异,表明需要将性别视角纳入疫情防范。像WGH这样的女性网络可以促进危机中的信息交流,并为女性提供专业和个人支持。

相似文献

1
Impact of COVID-19 on the private and professional lives of highly educated women working in global health in Europe-A qualitative study.新冠疫情对欧洲从事全球健康工作的高学历女性个人生活和职业生活的影响——一项定性研究
Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 Feb 13;4:1009473. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1009473. eCollection 2023.
2
Gender equality in the 21st century: Overcoming barriers to women's leadership in global health.21 世纪的性别平等:克服全球卫生领域女性领导力的障碍。
J Dent Educ. 2022 Sep;86(9):1144-1173. doi: 10.1002/jdd.13059.
3
Gender Norms and Gender Equality in Full-Time Employment and Health: A 97-Country Analysis of the World Values Survey.全职就业与健康方面的性别规范和性别平等:对世界价值观调查中97个国家的分析。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 31;13:689815. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.689815. eCollection 2022.
4
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the research activity and working experience of clinical academics, with a focus on gender and ethnicity: a qualitative study in the UK.COVID-19 大流行对临床学者的研究活动和工作经验的影响,重点关注性别和种族:英国的一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 8;12(6):e057655. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057655.
5
Care-home Nurses' responses to the COVID-19 pandemic: Managing ethical conundrums at personal cost: A qualitative study.养老院护士对 COVID-19 大流行的反应:以个人代价应对伦理困境:一项定性研究。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2023 Jan;55(1):226-238. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12855. Epub 2022 Dec 4.
6
A preparedness model for the provision of oral health care during unfolding threats: the case of the covid-19 pandemic.应对展开威胁时提供口腔卫生保健的准备模型:以 COVID-19 大流行为例。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 May 12;21(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01627-8.
7
"Family doctors are also people": a qualitative analysis of how family physicians managed competing personal and professional responsibilities during the COVID-19 pandemic.“家庭医生也是人”:一项定性分析,探讨家庭医生在 COVID-19 大流行期间如何管理相互竞争的个人和职业责任。
Hum Resour Health. 2024 Mar 4;22(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12960-024-00901-4.
8
Bargaining with patriarchy through the life course: obstacles faced (and overcome) by women leaders in Kerala's health sector.通过生命历程与父权制讨价还价:喀拉拉邦卫生部门女性领导者面临(并克服)的障碍。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Oct 11;21(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01744-y.
9
Gender and telework: Work and family experiences of teleworking professional, middle-class, married women with children during the Covid-19 pandemic in Turkey.性别与远程工作:土耳其新冠疫情期间有孩子的职业、中产阶级已婚女性远程工作的工作与家庭经历
Gend Work Organ. 2022 Jan;29(1):241-255. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12684. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
10
Trends of Pandemic Parenting in Medical Academia.医学学术领域的大流行育儿趋势。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Sep 15;23(5):678-683. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.6.54144.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer-related health behaviors during the COVID 19 pandemic in geographically diverse samples across the US.美国不同地理位置样本在新冠疫情期间与癌症相关的健康行为。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jan 9;25(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13373-5.
2
A Cross-Sectional Survey on Psychological Health and Influencing Factors Among 2628 Asymptomatic and Mild COVID-19 Patients in Fangcang Shelter Hospital.方舱医院2628例无症状及轻症新冠肺炎患者心理健康状况及影响因素的横断面调查
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2024 Jan 16;20:69-81. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S446223. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Collaboration enhances career progression in academic science, especially for female researchers.合作有助于学术科学领域的职业发展,尤其是对女性研究人员而言。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Sep 8;288(1958):20210219. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0219.
2
Longitudinal analyses of gender differences in first authorship publications related to COVID-19.与 COVID-19 相关的第一作者出版物中性别差异的纵向分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 5;11(4):e045176. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045176.
3
Gender Disparity in the Authorship of Biomedical Research Publications During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Observational Study.COVID-19 大流行期间生物医学研究出版物作者中的性别差异:回顾性观察研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 12;23(4):e25379. doi: 10.2196/25379.
4
Will COVID-19 result in a giant step backwards for women in academic science?新冠疫情是否会导致学术科学界的女性倒退一大步?
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;134:160-166. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.004. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
5
Inequalities in Children's Experiences of Home Learning during the COVID-19 Lockdown in England.英国新冠疫情封锁期间儿童居家学习经历的不平等现象。
Fisc Stud. 2020 Sep;41(3):653-683. doi: 10.1111/1475-5890.12240. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
6
Academic Productivity Differences by Gender and Child Age in Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, and Medicine Faculty During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间科学、技术、工程、数学和医学领域男女教师的学术生产力差异及其与子女年龄的关系
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Mar;30(3):341-347. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8710. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
7
Symptoms of a broken system: the gender gaps in COVID-19 decision-making.系统失灵的症状:新冠疫情决策中的性别差距
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003549.
8
Towards a 'virtual' world: Social isolation and struggles during the COVID-19 pandemic as single women living alone.迈向“虚拟”世界:新冠疫情期间独居单身女性的社会隔离与困境
Gend Work Organ. 2020 Sep;27(5):754-762. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12468. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
9
Covid-19 Outbreak In Italy: Are We Ready for the Psychosocial and the Economic Crisis? Baseline Findings From the PsyCovid Study.意大利的新冠疫情:我们是否准备好应对心理社会和经济危机?PsyCovid研究的基线结果
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 10;11:556. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00556. eCollection 2020.
10
Challenges for the female academic during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间女性学者面临的挑战。
Lancet. 2020 Jun 27;395(10242):1968-1970. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31412-4. Epub 2020 Jun 18.