Suppr超能文献

主要研究者在新冠疫情期间进行基本研究决策时的优先事项以及他们所认为的障碍和促进因素。

Principal Investigators' Priorities and Perceived Barriers and Facilitators When Making Decisions About Conducting Essential Research in the COVID-19 Pandemic.

机构信息

Bioethics Research Center, Division of General Medical Sciences, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2023 Mar 2;29(2):8. doi: 10.1007/s11948-023-00430-8.

Abstract

At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, stay-at-home orders disrupted normal research operations. Principal investigators (PIs) had to make decisions about conducting and staffing essential research under unprecedented, rapidly changing conditions. These decisions also had to be made amid other substantial work and life stressors, like pressures to be productive and staying healthy. Using survey methods, we asked PIs funded by the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation (N = 930) to rate how they prioritized different considerations, such as personal risks, risks to research personnel, and career consequences, when making decisions. They also reported how difficult they found these choices and associated symptoms of stress. Using a checklist, PIs indicated those factors in their research environments that made their decisions easier (i.e., facilitators) or more difficult (i.e., barriers) to make. Finally, PIs also indicated how satisfied they were with their decisions and management of research during the disruption. Descriptive statistics summarize PIs' responses and inferential tests explore whether responses varied by academic rank or gender. PIs overall reported prioritizing the well-being and perspectives of research personnel, and they perceived more facilitators than barriers. Early-career faculty, however, rated concerns about their careers and productivity as higher priorities compared to their senior counterparts. Early-career faculty also perceived greater difficulty and stress, more barriers, fewer facilitators, and had less satisfaction with their decisions. Women rated several interpersonal concerns about their research personnel more highly than men and reported greater stress. The experience and perceptions of researchers during the COVID-19 pandemic can inform policies and practices when planning for future crises and recovering from the pandemic.

摘要

在美国 COVID-19 大流行开始时,居家令打乱了正常的研究运作。主要研究者 (PI) 必须在前所未有的快速变化的条件下,决定进行和配备必要的研究,并做出人员安排。这些决策还必须在其他重大工作和生活压力下做出,例如保持生产力和保持健康的压力。我们使用调查方法,询问了由美国国立卫生研究院和美国国家科学基金会资助的主要研究者 (PI),他们对在做出决策时如何优先考虑个人风险、研究人员风险和职业后果等不同考虑因素进行了评分。他们还报告了这些选择的难度以及相关的压力症状。PI 使用清单表明了他们的研究环境中哪些因素使他们的决策更容易(即促进因素)或更难(即障碍因素)做出。最后,PI 还表示他们对在中断期间的决策和研究管理的满意度。描述性统计总结了 PI 的反应,推理检验探讨了反应是否因学术排名或性别而异。PI 总体上报告说优先考虑研究人员的福祉和观点,他们认为促进因素多于障碍因素。然而,与资深同行相比,早期职业教师将对职业和生产力的担忧评为更高的优先事项。早期职业教师还认为困难和压力更大,障碍更多,促进因素更少,对决策的满意度更低。女性对其研究人员的一些人际关系问题的评价高于男性,并报告了更大的压力。在 COVID-19 大流行期间研究人员的经验和看法可以为未来危机规划和从大流行中恢复提供政策和实践依据。

相似文献

4
Fairness and COVID: Conducting research during the crisis.公平与新冠疫情:危机时期的研究。
Account Res. 2024 Nov;31(8):1062-1084. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2201442. Epub 2023 Apr 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验