• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二极管激光(连续模式)、二极管激光(脉冲模式)与5.25%次氯酸钠在根管消毒中抗菌效果的比较评估:一项简短研究

Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Diode Laser (Continuous Mode), Diode Laser (Pulse Mode), and 5.25% of Sodium Hypochlorite in Disinfection of Root Canal: A Short Study.

作者信息

Mishra Ankur, Koul Monika, Abdullah Ahsan, Khan Nausheen, Dhawan Preeti, Bhat Anu

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Career Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences & Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, BRS Dental College and Hospital, Panchkula, Haryana, India.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Sep-Oct;15(5):579-583. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2444.

DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2444
PMID:36865733
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9973105/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The success of endodontic treatment is achieved by the complete elimination of pulpal infection and protection from future invasion of microorganisms. Due to the complex structure of the root canal, complete eradication of microorganisms is not possible and is a major challenge for successful endodontic treatment. Therefore, microbiological studies are needed to explore the effect of various disinfection methods.

AIM AND OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of root canal disinfection by using a diode laser (in pulse and continuous modes) and sodium hypochlorite by microbiological assessment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-five patients were selected and randomly divided into three groups. After gaining patency to the root canal the first sample from the root canal was taken using a sterile absorbent paper point and transferred to a sterile tube containing a normal saline medium. Biomechanical preparation was performed with Dentsply Protaper hand files of each corresponding group and was disinfected with group I (diode light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation (LASER) 980 nm with 3 W in continuous mode for 20 seconds), group II (diode LASER 980 nm with 3 W in pulse mode for 20 seconds), group III (irrigated with 5.25% of sodium hypochlorite for 5 minutes). Pre- and post-samples of each group were inoculated on sheep blood agar and examined for any bacterial growth. After the microbial evaluation of the total microbial count of pre- and post-samples, the data obtained were tabulated and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

The data were evaluated and analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) on Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software. Groups I, II, and III all three groups showed significant differences ( < 0.01) and an overall reduction in the microbial count at postbiomechanical preparation (BMP) as compared to pre-BMP with the highest being in laser in continuous mode (group I) (91.9%), followed by 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (group III) (86.5%) and LASER in pulse mode (group II) (72.0%) the least.

CONCLUSION

The study concluded that the diode laser in continuous mode is more efficacious than the diode laser in pulse mode and 5.2% sodium hypochlorite, respectively.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Mishra A, Koul M, Abdullah A, Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Diode Laser (Continuous Mode), Diode Laser (Pulse Mode), and 5.25% of Sodium Hypochlorite in Disinfection of Root Canal: A Short Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15(5):579-583.

摘要

引言

牙髓治疗的成功是通过彻底消除牙髓感染并防止微生物未来的侵入来实现的。由于根管结构复杂,不可能完全根除微生物,这是牙髓治疗成功的一项重大挑战。因此,需要进行微生物学研究以探索各种消毒方法的效果。

目的

本研究的目的是通过微生物学评估比较使用二极管激光(脉冲和连续模式)和次氯酸钠进行根管消毒的效果。

材料与方法

选择45例患者并随机分为三组。在打通根管通路后,使用无菌吸水纸尖从根管中采集第一个样本,并转移至含有生理盐水培养基的无菌试管中。各相应组使用登士柏Protaper手动锉进行生物力学预备,然后分别用以下方法消毒:第一组(波长980nm、功率3W的二极管激光连续模式照射20秒),第二组(波长980nm、功率3W的二极管激光脉冲模式照射20秒),第三组(用5.25%的次氯酸钠冲洗5分钟)。每组的术前和术后样本接种于羊血琼脂上,检查是否有细菌生长。在对术前和术后样本的总微生物计数进行微生物评估后,将获得的数据制成表格并进行统计分析。

结果

使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)中的方差分析(ANOVA)对数据进行评估和分析。第一组、第二组和第三组均显示出显著差异(P<0.01),并且与生物力学预备前相比,生物力学预备后(BMP)的微生物计数总体减少,其中连续模式激光组(第一组)最高(91.9%),其次是5.25%次氯酸钠组(第三组)(86.5%),脉冲模式激光组(第二组)最少(72.0%)。

结论

该研究得出结论,连续模式的二极管激光分别比脉冲模式的二极管激光和5.2%次氯酸钠更有效。

如何引用本文

Mishra A, Koul M, Abdullah A, 根管消毒中二极管激光(连续模式)、二极管激光(脉冲模式)和5.25%次氯酸钠抗菌效果的比较评价:一项简短研究。《国际临床儿科牙科学杂志》2022;15(5):579 - 583。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ec8/9973105/d6e9ab4c4bb2/ijcpd-15-579-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ec8/9973105/063c2cd461f0/ijcpd-15-579-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ec8/9973105/d05a87f0a96d/ijcpd-15-579-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ec8/9973105/ade3ccff9591/ijcpd-15-579-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ec8/9973105/029b7f1a5169/ijcpd-15-579-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ec8/9973105/9f90a895e9e0/ijcpd-15-579-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ec8/9973105/b9284f4b5563/ijcpd-15-579-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ec8/9973105/c44cf3a84b8f/ijcpd-15-579-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ec8/9973105/d6e9ab4c4bb2/ijcpd-15-579-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ec8/9973105/063c2cd461f0/ijcpd-15-579-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ec8/9973105/d05a87f0a96d/ijcpd-15-579-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ec8/9973105/ade3ccff9591/ijcpd-15-579-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ec8/9973105/029b7f1a5169/ijcpd-15-579-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ec8/9973105/9f90a895e9e0/ijcpd-15-579-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ec8/9973105/b9284f4b5563/ijcpd-15-579-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ec8/9973105/c44cf3a84b8f/ijcpd-15-579-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ec8/9973105/d6e9ab4c4bb2/ijcpd-15-579-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Diode Laser (Continuous Mode), Diode Laser (Pulse Mode), and 5.25% of Sodium Hypochlorite in Disinfection of Root Canal: A Short Study.二极管激光(连续模式)、二极管激光(脉冲模式)与5.25%次氯酸钠在根管消毒中抗菌效果的比较评估:一项简短研究
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Sep-Oct;15(5):579-583. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2444.
2
An Study Comparing the Antimicrobial Efficacy of 0.2% Chitosan, 3% Sodium Hypochlorite, 2% Chlorhexidine against , Alone and in Conjunction with Diode Laser.一项比较0.2%壳聚糖、3%次氯酸钠、2%氯己定单独及与二极管激光联合使用时抗菌效果的研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Jan-Feb;15(1):109-114. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2351.
3
Antibacterial Efficacy of Sodium Hypochlorite, Ozonated Water, and 980 nm Diode Laser Used for Disinfection of Root Canal against : A Microbiological Study.次氯酸钠、臭氧水和980纳米二极管激光用于根管消毒的抗菌效果:一项微生物学研究
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Nov-Dec;13(6):694-699. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1860.
4
Antimicrobial efficacy of photodynamic therapy, diode laser, and sodium hypochlorite and their combinations on endodontic pathogens.光动力疗法、二极管激光、次氯酸钠及其组合对根管病原体的抗菌效果。
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2019 Dec;28:265-272. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.09.009. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
5
Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Chlorhexidine, Diode Laser, and Saline in Reducing the Microbial Count in Primary Teeth Root Canals: An Study.洗必泰、二极管激光和生理盐水降低乳牙根管内微生物数量效果的比较评价:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 May-Jun;16(3):459-463. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2596.
6
Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Chlorhexidine, Sodium Hypochlorite, the Diode Laser and Saline in Reducing the Microbial Count in Primary Teeth Root Canals - An In Vivo Study.洗必泰、次氯酸钠、二极管激光和生理盐水降低乳牙根尖根管内微生物数量效果的比较评估——一项体内研究。
J Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Fall;10(4):268-274. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2019.44. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
7
Microbiological Effectiveness of Sodium Hypochlorite Gel and Aqueous Solution When Implemented for Root Canal Disinfection in Multirooted Teeth: A Randomized Clinical Study.次氯酸钠凝胶和水溶液用于多根牙根管消毒时的微生物学有效性:一项随机临床研究
J Funct Biomater. 2023 Apr 24;14(5):240. doi: 10.3390/jfb14050240.
8
Disinfection Efficacy of Laser Activation on Different Forms and Concentrations of Sodium Hypochlorite Root Canal Irrigant against in Primary Teeth.激光激活对不同形态和浓度的次氯酸钠根管冲洗剂在乳牙中消毒效果的影响
Children (Basel). 2023 Dec 3;10(12):1887. doi: 10.3390/children10121887.
9
An comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of photoactivated disinfection, diode laser, and 5% sodium hypochlorite in root canal disinfection.光活化消毒、二极管激光和5%次氯酸钠在根管消毒中抗菌效果的比较。
J Conserv Dent. 2018 Mar-Apr;21(2):205-209. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_227_17.
10
Bioburden assessment of necrotic teeth disinfected with sodium hypochlorite, diode laser, and photodynamic therapy using flow cytometry-a randomized double-blinded clinical trial.使用流式细胞术评估次氯酸钠、二极管激光和光动力疗法消毒的坏死牙的生物负荷:一项随机双盲临床试验。
Lasers Med Sci. 2023 Sep 22;38(1):216. doi: 10.1007/s10103-023-03877-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the effectiveness of various disinfectants in deep carious lesions: An study.评估各种消毒剂在深龋病变中的有效性:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Mar;28(3):258-263. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_833_24. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
2
Efficacy of non -thermal pressure plasma versus other modalities for disinfection of primary root canals.非热压力等离子体与其他方式用于消毒初治根管的效果比较
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jan 11;25(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05349-5.
3
Intraoral Applications of Lasers in the Prosthetic Rehabilitation with Fixed Partial Dentures-A Narrative Review.

本文引用的文献

1
High-power diode laser in the disinfection in depth of the root canal dentin.高功率二极管激光用于根管牙本质深层消毒。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Jul;106(1):e68-72. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.02.032.
2
Efficacy of various concentrations of NaOCl and instrumentation techniques in reducing Enterococcus faecalis within root canals and dentinal tubules.不同浓度次氯酸钠及根管预备技术在减少根管和牙本质小管内粪肠球菌方面的效果。
Int Endod J. 2006 Jan;39(1):10-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01038.x.
3
Temperature evolution on human teeth root surface after diode laser assisted endodontic treatment.
激光在固定局部义齿修复中的口腔内应用——一项叙述性综述
Dent J (Basel). 2024 May 31;12(6):164. doi: 10.3390/dj12060164.
4
Disinfection Efficacy of Laser Activation on Different Forms and Concentrations of Sodium Hypochlorite Root Canal Irrigant against in Primary Teeth.激光激活对不同形态和浓度的次氯酸钠根管冲洗剂在乳牙中消毒效果的影响
Children (Basel). 2023 Dec 3;10(12):1887. doi: 10.3390/children10121887.
二极管激光辅助根管治疗后人类牙根表面的温度变化
Lasers Med Sci. 2005 Sep;20(2):99-103. doi: 10.1007/s10103-005-0347-9. Epub 2005 Jul 9.
4
Bactericidal effect of different laser systems in the deep layers of dentin.不同激光系统对牙本质深层的杀菌作用。
Lasers Surg Med. 2004;35(2):111-6. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20026.
5
Chelating agents in root canal treatment: mode of action and indications for their use.根管治疗中的螯合剂:作用方式及其使用指征
Int Endod J. 2003 Dec;36(12):810-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2003.00754.x.
6
Efficacy of NaOCl/H2O2 irrigation and GaAlAs laser in decontamination of root canals in vitro.次氯酸钠/过氧化氢冲洗与砷化镓铝激光对根管进行体外消毒的效果
Lasers Surg Med. 2003;32(3):189-96. doi: 10.1002/lsm.10148.
7
Diode laser radiation and its bactericidal effect in root canal wall dentin.二极管激光辐射及其在根管壁牙本质中的杀菌作用。
J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2000 Apr;18(2):57-60. doi: 10.1089/clm.2000.18.57.
8
Complications during root canal irrigation--literature review and case reports.根管冲洗过程中的并发症——文献综述与病例报告
Int Endod J. 2000 May;33(3):186-93. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00303.x.
9
Chemomechanical reduction of the bacterial population in the root canal after instrumentation and irrigation with 1%, 2.5%, and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite.使用1%、2.5%和5.25%的次氯酸钠进行根管预备和冲洗后,对根管内细菌数量进行化学机械性减少。
J Endod. 2000 Jun;26(6):331-4. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200006000-00006.
10
The efficiency of root canal disinfection using a holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser in vitro.钬:钇铝石榴石激光用于根管消毒的体外效率
J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1997;15(2):75-8. doi: 10.1089/clm.1997.15.75.