Suppr超能文献

内镜下颈椎后外侧孔切开术的学习曲线。

Learning curve for endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy.

机构信息

Texas Back Institute, 6020 West Parker Road, Suite 200, Plano, TX, 75093, USA.

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2023 Aug;32(8):2670-2678. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07623-6. Epub 2023 Mar 3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

While anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as well as cervical disk arthroplasty are gold standard treatments for the surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy, posterior endoscopic cervical foraminotomy (PECF) as a substitute procedure is gaining popularity. To date, studies investigating the number of surgeries needed to achieve proficiency in this procedure are lacking. The purpose of the study is to examine the learning curve for PECF.

METHODS

The learning curve in operative time for two fellowship-trained spine surgeons at independent institutions was retrospectively assessed for 90 uniportal PECF procedures (PBD: n = 26, CPH: n = 64) performed from 2015 to 2022. Operative time was assessed across consecutive cases using a nonparametric monotone regression, and a plateau in operative time was used as a proxy to define the learning curve. Secondary outcomes assessing achievement of endoscopic prowess before and after the initial learning curve included number of fluoroscopy images, visual analog scale (VAS) for neck and arm, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and the need for reoperation.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in operative time between surgeons (p = 0.420). The start of a plateau for Surgeon 1 occurred at 9 cases and 111.6 min. The start of a plateau for Surgeon 2 occurred at 29 cases and 114.7 min. A second plateau for Surgeon 2 occurred at 49 cases and 91.8 min. Fluoroscopy use did not significantly change before and after surmounting the learning curve. The majority of patients achieved minimally clinically important differences in VAS and NDI after PECF, but postoperative VAS and NDI did not significantly differ before and after achieving the learning curve. There were no significant differences in revisions or postoperative cervical injections before and after reaching a steady state in the learning curve.

CONCLUSION

PECF is an advanced endoscopic technique with an initial improvement in operative time that occurred after as few as 8 cases to as many as 28 cases in this series. A second learning curve may occur with additional cases. Patient-reported outcomes improve following surgery, and these outcomes are independent of the surgeon's position on the learning curve. Fluoroscopy use does not change significantly along the learning curve. PECF is a safe and effective technique that current and future spine surgeons should consider as part of their armamentarium.

摘要

目的

颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术和颈椎间盘置换术是治疗神经根型颈椎病的金标准,但作为替代手术的后路内镜下颈椎侧方减压术(PECF)越来越受欢迎。目前,还缺乏研究来评估掌握该手术所需的手术次数。本研究旨在探讨 PECF 的学习曲线。

方法

回顾性分析了 2015 年至 2022 年期间,在两家独立机构接受培训的 2 名脊柱外科医生对 90 例单门户 PECF 手术(PBD:n=26,CPH:n=64)的手术时间学习曲线。使用非参数单调回归评估连续病例的手术时间,以手术时间的平台作为定义学习曲线的替代指标。评估学习曲线前后内镜技术掌握情况的次要结局指标包括透视图像数量、颈部和手臂视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、颈部残疾指数(NDI)和再次手术的需要。

结果

两名外科医生的手术时间无显著差异(p=0.420)。第一位外科医生的平台起点出现在第 9 例和 111.6 分钟。第二位外科医生的平台起点出现在第 29 例和 114.7 分钟。第二位外科医生在第 49 例和 91.8 分钟出现了第二个平台。透视使用在越过学习曲线前后没有明显变化。大多数患者在 PECF 后在 VAS 和 NDI 方面达到了最小临床重要差异,但在达到学习曲线前后,VAS 和 NDI 评分无显著差异。在学习曲线达到稳定状态前后,修订或术后颈椎注射无显著差异。

结论

PECF 是一种先进的内镜技术,在本研究中,手术时间的初始改善发生在 8 例至 28 例之间。在这一系列中,可能会出现第二个学习曲线。术后患者报告的结果得到改善,这些结果与外科医生在学习曲线上的位置无关。透视使用在学习曲线过程中没有显著变化。PECF 是一种安全有效的技术,目前和未来的脊柱外科医生都应将其视为其手术工具的一部分。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验