Institute of Family Medicine, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Int J Med Educ. 2023 Feb 28;14:11-18. doi: 10.5116/ijme.63de.3840.
To analyse stress coping styles of medical students at different time points of medical education and to identify predictors of functional coping.
A cross-sectional study was conducted among medical students (N = 497, 361 women and 136 men) before year one (n = 141), after year one (n = 135) and after year five (n = 220). Students answered the Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory, the Work-Related Behaviour and Experience Patterns, the Perceived Medical School Stress Instrument and the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Multiple regression was used to examine factors associated with functional coping.
Single factor ANOVA indicated a significant difference for functional coping between the time points (F = 9.52, p < .01), with fifth-year students scoring significantly higher than students before or after year one. There was a significant difference in dysfunctional coping (F = 12.37, p < .01), with students before year one and after year five scoring higher than those after year one. Efficacy (β = 0.15, t = 4.66, p < .01), emotional distancing (β = 0.04, t = 3.50, p < .01) and satisfaction with life (β = 0.06, t = 4.87, p < .01) were positive predictors of functional coping.
Scores for both functional and dysfunctional coping vary during medical education. The reasons for low coping scores after year one require further explanation. These findings represent a starting point for investigations into how to promote functional coping during early medical education.
分析医学教育不同阶段医学生的应对压力方式,并确定功能应对的预测因素。
在医学教育一年级前(n=141)、一年级后(n=135)和五年级后(n=220),对497 名医学生(361 名女性,136 名男性)进行了横断面研究。学生回答了《经验问题应对取向简表》《工作行为和经验模式》《医学生压力感知量表》和《马斯拉赫倦怠量表》。采用多元回归分析来检验与功能应对相关的因素。
单因素方差分析表明,功能应对在不同时间点之间存在显著差异(F=9.52,p<0.01),五年级学生的得分显著高于一年级前和一年级后的学生。在功能失调应对方面存在显著差异(F=12.37,p<0.01),一年级前和五年级的学生得分高于一年级后的学生。效能感(β=0.15,t=4.66,p<0.01)、情绪疏离(β=0.04,t=3.50,p<0.01)和生活满意度(β=0.06,t=4.87,p<0.01)是功能应对的积极预测因素。
在医学教育过程中,功能应对和功能失调应对的得分都有所不同。一年级后应对得分较低的原因需要进一步解释。这些发现为研究如何在早期医学教育中促进功能应对提供了起点。