Chu Ryan Sai Ting, Tong Co Co Ho Yi, Wong Corine Sau Man, Chang Wing Chung, Tang Wesley Chor Yin, Chan Charlotte Cheuk Lok, Lui Simon S Y, Hui Lai Ming, Suen Yi Nam, Chan Kit Wa, Lee Ho Ming, Chen Eric Yu Hai
Department of Psychiatry, LKS Faculty of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
LKS Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 16;14:1123046. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1123046. eCollection 2023.
Suboptimal effort-based decision-making with reduced willingness to expend effort for high-probability/high-value reward is observed in schizophrenia patients and is related to diminished motivation, but is understudied in schizotypy. This study aimed to examine effort-allocation in schizotypy individuals and its association with amotivation and psychosocial functioning.
We recruited 40 schizotypy individuals and 40 demographically-matched healthy controls, based on Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire-Brief (SPQ-B) score (top and bottom 10% SPQ-B scores, respectively), from 2400 young people aged 15-24 years participating a population-based mental health survey in Hong Kong and examined effort-allocation using the Effort Expenditure for Reward Task (EEfRT). Negative / amotivation symptoms and psychosocial functioning were assessed by the Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS) and the Social Functioning and Occupational Assessment Scale (SOFAS), respectively. Schizotypy individuals were categorized into high-amotivation and low-amotivation groups based on a median-split of BNSS amotivation domain score.
Our results showed no main group effect (in either two or three-group comparison) on effort task performance. Three-group comparison analyses on selected EEfRT performance indices revealed that high-amotivation schizotypy individuals displayed significantly less increase in effortful options from low-value to high-value reward (reward-difference score) and from low-probability/low-value to high-probability/high-value reward (probability/reward-difference score) than low-amotivation individuals and controls. Correlation analyses demonstrated trend-wise significance between BNSS amotivation domain score and several EEfRT performance indices in schizotypy group. Schizotypy individuals with poorer psychosocial functioning tended to exhibit smaller probability/reward-difference score relative to other two groups.
Our findings indicate subtle effort-allocation abnormalities in schizotypy individuals with high levels of diminished motivation, and suggest the link between laboratory-based effort-cost measures and real-world functional outcome.
在精神分裂症患者中观察到基于努力的决策欠佳,为高概率/高价值奖励付出努力的意愿降低,这与动机减弱有关,但在分裂型人格特质中研究较少。本研究旨在考察分裂型人格特质个体的努力分配情况及其与无动机状态和社会心理功能的关联。
我们从参与香港一项基于人群的心理健康调查的2400名15 - 24岁年轻人中,根据分裂型人格问卷简版(SPQ - B)得分(分别为SPQ - B得分最高和最低的10%)招募了40名分裂型人格特质个体和40名人口统计学匹配的健康对照者,并使用奖励任务的努力支出(EEfRT)来考察努力分配情况。分别通过简明阴性症状量表(BNSS)和社会功能与职业评估量表(SOFAS)评估阴性/无动机症状和社会心理功能。根据BNSS无动机领域得分的中位数分割,将分裂型人格特质个体分为高无动机组和低无动机组。
我们的结果显示,在努力任务表现上没有主要的组间效应(在两组或三组比较中均无)。对选定的EEfRT表现指标进行的三组比较分析表明,高无动机的分裂型人格特质个体从低价值到高价值奖励(奖励差异得分)以及从低概率/低价值到高概率/高价值奖励(概率/奖励差异得分)时,努力选项的增加显著少于低无动机个体和对照组。相关分析表明,在分裂型人格特质组中,BNSS无动机领域得分与几个EEfRT表现指标之间存在趋势性显著关系。社会心理功能较差的分裂型人格特质个体相对于其他两组,往往表现出较小的概率/奖励差异得分。
我们的研究结果表明,在动机严重减弱的分裂型人格特质个体中存在细微的努力分配异常,并提示基于实验室的努力成本测量与现实世界功能结果之间的联系。