Fernando Caroline A, Dissanayake Deklanji T, Hewamana Uththara I, Rathnaweera Shyamini, Samanthilake Wickrama A, Tudugala Ranga, Jayasekara Kithsiri B, Kuruppu Kumudu
Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University, Werahera, Sri Lanka.
Department of Quality Management, National Blood Center, Narahenpita, Sri Lanka.
Afr J Lab Med. 2023 Feb 23;12(1):1987. doi: 10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.1987. eCollection 2023.
Haemolysis - one of the major limiting factors of red cell concentrate quality - must be measured as a quality-monitoring requirement. According to international quality standards, percentage haemolysis must be monitored in 1.0% of red cell concentrates produced monthly and maintained under 0.8%.
This study assessed three alternative methods for determining plasma haemoglobin concentration in peripheral blood banks that lack a plasma or low haemoglobin photometer - the gold-standard method - in Sri Lanka.
A standard haemolysate was prepared using an unexpired whole blood pack of normal haemoglobin concentration. A concentration series from 0.1 g/dL to 1.0 g/dL was prepared by diluting portions of standard haemolysate with saline. The alternative methods, namely visual haemoglobin colour scale, spectrophotometric calibration graph, and standard haemolysate capillary tube comparison, were designed using this concentration series and were used to test red cell concentrates received at the Quality Control Department of the National Blood Center, Sri Lanka, from February 2021 to May 2021.
A strong correlation was observed between the haemoglobin photometer method and the alternative methods ( = ~0.9). Based on the linear regression model, the standard haemolysate capillary tube comparison method was the best of the three alternative methods ( = 0.974).
All three alternative methods are recommended for use in peripheral blood banks. The standard haemolysate capillary tube comparison method was the best model.
溶血是红细胞浓缩物质量的主要限制因素之一,必须作为质量监测要求进行测量。根据国际质量标准,每月生产的红细胞浓缩物中必须有1.0%监测溶血百分比,并保持在0.8%以下。
本研究评估了斯里兰卡缺乏血浆或低血红蛋白光度计(金标准方法)的外周血库中测定血浆血红蛋白浓度的三种替代方法。
使用未过期的正常血红蛋白浓度全血包制备标准溶血产物。通过用盐水稀释部分标准溶血产物制备0.1 g/dL至1.0 g/dL的浓度系列。利用该浓度系列设计了替代方法,即视觉血红蛋白比色法、分光光度校准图法和标准溶血产物毛细管比较法,并用于检测2021年2月至2021年5月在斯里兰卡国家血液中心质量控制部收到的红细胞浓缩物。
观察到血红蛋白光度计法与替代方法之间存在强相关性(=~0.9)。基于线性回归模型,标准溶血产物毛细管比较法是三种替代方法中最好的(=0.974)。
推荐所有三种替代方法用于外周血库。标准溶血产物毛细管比较法是最佳模型。