• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于社会认知理论构建的家庭地震准备相关因素:系统评价。

Factors related to earthquake preparedness of households based on social-cognitive theory constructs: A systematic review.

机构信息

Health in Disasters and Emergencies Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

Environmental Health Engineering Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 16;11:987418. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.987418. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.987418
PMID:36875355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9978524/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Earthquakes cause many casualties worldwide. Taking preventive measures and improving community preparedness is critical to reducing earthquake damage. The social cognitive theory explains how individual and environmental factors cause behavior. This review was conducted to identify the social cognitive theory structures, in research on the preparedness of households against earthquakes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search was conducted from January 1, 2000, to October 30, 2021 in Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Studies were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The initial search yielded 9,225 articles, and finally, 18 articles were selected. Articles were assessed using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist.

RESULTS

Eighteen articles about disaster preparedness behaviors based on the socio-cognitive constructs were identified and reviewed. The essential constructs used in the reviewed studies included self-efficacy, collective efficacy, knowledge, outcome expectations, social support, and normative beliefs.

CONCLUSION

By identifying the dominant structures that have been used in studies related to the preparedness of households against earthquakes, researchers can implement appropriate and more cost-effective interventions by focusing on improving suitable structures.

摘要

背景

地震在全球范围内造成了许多人员伤亡。采取预防措施和提高社区的准备水平对于减少地震造成的损失至关重要。社会认知理论解释了个人和环境因素如何导致行为。本综述旨在确定家庭在地震防备方面的研究中使用的社会认知理论结构。

材料与方法

本系统评价按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行。于 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 10 月 30 日在 Web of Science、Scopus、PubMed 和 Google Scholar 中进行了检索。根据纳入和排除标准选择研究。最初的检索产生了 9225 篇文章,最终选择了 18 篇文章。使用观察性研究的强化报告标准(STROBE)检查表对文章进行评估。

结果

确定并回顾了 18 篇基于社会认知结构的关于灾害防备行为的文章。在已审查的研究中使用的重要结构包括自我效能感、集体效能感、知识、结果预期、社会支持和规范信念。

结论

通过确定在与家庭应对地震准备相关的研究中使用的主要结构,研究人员可以通过关注改善合适的结构来实施适当且更具成本效益的干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7af7/9978524/ad88c1735188/fpubh-11-987418-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7af7/9978524/ad88c1735188/fpubh-11-987418-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7af7/9978524/ad88c1735188/fpubh-11-987418-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors related to earthquake preparedness of households based on social-cognitive theory constructs: A systematic review.基于社会认知理论构建的家庭地震准备相关因素:系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 16;11:987418. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.987418. eCollection 2023.
2
Domains and Psychometric Properties of Scales Measuring Disaster Preparedness among General Population: A Systematic Literature Review.领域和衡量一般人群灾害准备情况的量表的心理计量学特性:系统文献回顾。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2023 Oct;38(5):636-644. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X23006386. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
3
Application of Behavioral Theories to Disaster and Emergency Health Preparedness: A Systematic Review.行为理论在灾害与应急卫生准备中的应用:一项系统综述。
PLoS Curr. 2015 Jul 1;7:ecurrents.dis.31a8995ced321301466db400f1357829. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.31a8995ced321301466db400f1357829.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Earthquake preparedness of households and its predictors based on health belief model.基于健康信念模型的家庭地震准备及其预测因素。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 8;20(1):646. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08814-2.
7
Health-related quality of life among older adults who experienced the Pohang earthquake in South Korea: A cross-sectional survey.韩国 Pohang 地震后老年人的健康相关生活质量:一项横断面调查。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Mar 4;20(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01944-8.
8
Earthquake-Related Orthopedic Injuries in Adult Population: A Systematic Review.成年人群中与地震相关的骨科损伤:一项系统综述。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017 Apr;32(2):201-208. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16001515. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
9
The viewpoints of residents of Kerman, Iran regarding the challenges and barriers of preparing households against earthquakes: A theory-guided qualitative content analysis.伊朗克尔曼居民对家庭防震准备面临的挑战和障碍的观点:基于理论的定性内容分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 24;10:1036311. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1036311. eCollection 2022.
10
Does Trust Help to Improve Residents' Perceptions of the Efficacy of Disaster Preparedness? Evidence from Wenchuan and Lushan Earthquakes in Sichuan Province, China.信任有助于提高居民对备灾效果的认知吗?来自中国四川省汶川和芦山地震的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 8;19(8):4515. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084515.

引用本文的文献

1
First responders' experiences with major earthquakes in Türkiye: a qualitative study of innovation needs and challenges.土耳其急救人员应对重大地震的经历:对创新需求与挑战的定性研究
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Apr 14;25(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01217-9.
2
Psychological influences and implications for household disaster preparedness: a systematic review.心理因素对家庭备灾的影响及启示:一项系统综述
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 14;13:1457406. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1457406. eCollection 2025.
3
Modeling factors related to earthquake preparedness: a structural equation modeling approach.

本文引用的文献

1
Coronavirus disease-2019 risk management using strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats analysis approach in the health system: A qualitative multimethod study.运用优势、劣势、机会、威胁分析方法进行2019冠状病毒病风险管理:一项定性多方法研究
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Dec 31;10:453. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1599_20. eCollection 2021.
2
Disaster preparedness and resilience at household level in Yangon, Myanmar.缅甸仰光家庭层面的灾害防范与恢复力
Nat Hazards (Dordr). 2022;112(2):1273-1294. doi: 10.1007/s11069-022-05226-w. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
3
Challenges to manage pandemic of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Iran with a special situation: a qualitative multi-method study.
与地震防备相关的因素建模:一种结构方程建模方法。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 3;25(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21568-z.
4
Risk messaging style and its effect on public preparedness for earthquakes: longitudinal intervention-based study.风险信息传达方式及其对公众地震防范准备的影响:基于纵向干预的研究。
J Public Health Policy. 2025 Mar;46(1):87-109. doi: 10.1057/s41271-024-00534-w. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
5
Too much social media? Unveiling the effects of determinants in social media fatigue.社交媒体使用过度?揭示社交媒体疲劳中各种决定因素的影响。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 23;15:1277846. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1277846. eCollection 2024.
6
Investigating the effectiveness of protection motivation theory in predicting behaviors relating to natural disasters, in the households of southern Iran.调查保护动机理论在预测伊朗南部家庭与自然灾害相关行为方面的有效性。
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 7;11:1201195. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1201195. eCollection 2023.
伊朗特殊情况下管理冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的挑战:一项定性多方法研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 22;21(1):1919. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11973-5.
4
Factors Associated With Individual Emergency Preparedness Behaviors: A Cross-Sectional Survey Among the Public in Three Chinese Provinces.与个体应急准备行为相关的因素:三省公众横断面调查
Front Public Health. 2021 May 21;9:644421. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.644421. eCollection 2021.
5
Place Attachment and Household Disaster Preparedness: Examining the Mediation Role of Self-Efficacy.地方依恋与家庭灾害准备:自我效能的中介作用检验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 23;18(11):5565. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115565.
6
Longitudinal Study of Hurricane Preparedness Behaviors: Influence of Collective Efficacy.纵向研究飓风防范行为:集体效能的影响。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Jun;16(3):1046-1052. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.504. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
7
Public health risks threatening health of people participating in mass gatherings: A qualitative study.参与集会人群健康所受公共卫生风险威胁:定性研究。
Indian J Public Health. 2020 Jul-Sep;64(3):242-247. doi: 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_305_19.
8
Hospital Disaster Preparedness in Iran: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.伊朗的医院灾难准备情况:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
Iran J Public Health. 2020 May;49(5):837-850.
9
Challenges and Problems Facing 2017 Kermanshah Earthquake Survivors: A Qualitative Study.2017 年克尔曼沙阿地震幸存者面临的挑战和问题:一项定性研究。
Community Ment Health J. 2021 Feb;57(2):340-348. doi: 10.1007/s10597-020-00652-1. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
10
Earthquake preparedness of households and its predictors based on health belief model.基于健康信念模型的家庭地震准备及其预测因素。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 8;20(1):646. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08814-2.