• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于风险的社会大流行影响政策分析决策框架。

A risk-based decision framework for policy analysis of societal pandemic effects.

机构信息

Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

Advancing Systems Analysis (ASA), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 17;11:1064554. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1064554. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1064554
PMID:36875415
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9982005/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In this article, we summarize our findings from an EU-supported project for policy analyses applied to pandemics such as Covid-19 (with the potential to be applied as well to other, similar hazards) while considering various mitigation levels and consequence sets under several criteria.

METHODS

It is based on our former development for handling imprecise information in risk trees and multi-criteria hierarchies using intervals and qualitative estimates. We shortly present the theoretical background and demonstrate how it can be used for systematic policy analyses. In our model, we use decision trees and multi-criteria hierarchies extended by belief distributions for weights, probabilities and values as well as combination rules to aggregate the background information in an extended expected value model, taking into criteria weights as well as probabilities and outcome values. We used the computer-supported tool DecideIT for the aggregate decision analysis under uncertainty.

RESULTS

The framework has been applied in three countries: Botswana, Romania and Jordan, and extended for scenario-building during the third wave of the pandemic in Sweden, proving its feasibility in real-time policy-making for pandemic mitigation measures.

DISCUSSION

This work resulted in a more fine-grained model for policy decision that is much more aligned to the societal needs in the future, either if the Covid-19 pandemic prevails or for the next pandemic or other society-wide hazardous emergencies.

摘要

简介

本文总结了我们在欧盟支持的项目中的发现,该项目针对大流行(如 COVID-19)进行政策分析,同时考虑了在不同标准下的各种缓解水平和后果集,这些分析也可应用于其他类似的风险。

方法

该方法基于我们之前在使用区间和定性估计处理风险树和多准则层次结构中的不精确信息的开发。我们简要介绍了理论背景,并演示了如何将其用于系统的政策分析。在我们的模型中,我们使用决策树和多准则层次结构,通过置信分布来扩展权重、概率和价值,以及组合规则,以便在扩展的期望值模型中汇总背景信息,同时考虑到标准权重、概率和结果价值。我们使用计算机支持的工具 DecideIT 进行不确定条件下的综合决策分析。

结果

该框架已在三个国家(博茨瓦纳、罗马尼亚和约旦)中应用,并在瑞典大流行的第三波期间扩展到情景构建,证明了其在大流行缓解措施实时决策中的可行性。

讨论

这项工作导致了一个更精细的政策决策模型,该模型在未来与社会需求更加一致,无论是 COVID-19 大流行持续存在,还是下一次大流行或其他全社会危险紧急情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f757/9982005/c26af7f37bad/fpubh-11-1064554-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f757/9982005/11d67853c64e/fpubh-11-1064554-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f757/9982005/a1c70ec1b031/fpubh-11-1064554-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f757/9982005/e1df9fc736e1/fpubh-11-1064554-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f757/9982005/ed0e08f17e58/fpubh-11-1064554-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f757/9982005/c26af7f37bad/fpubh-11-1064554-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f757/9982005/11d67853c64e/fpubh-11-1064554-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f757/9982005/a1c70ec1b031/fpubh-11-1064554-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f757/9982005/e1df9fc736e1/fpubh-11-1064554-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f757/9982005/ed0e08f17e58/fpubh-11-1064554-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f757/9982005/c26af7f37bad/fpubh-11-1064554-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
A risk-based decision framework for policy analysis of societal pandemic effects.基于风险的社会大流行影响政策分析决策框架。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 17;11:1064554. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1064554. eCollection 2023.
2
A Multi-Criteria Framework for Pandemic Response Measures.多准则框架下的大流行病应对措施
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 20;9:583706. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.583706. eCollection 2021.
3
The need for holistic, longitudinal and comparable, real-time assessment of the emotional, behavioral and societal impact of the COVID-19 pandemic across nations.需要对新冠疫情在各国造成的情感、行为和社会影响进行全面、纵向、可比的实时评估。
Psychiatriki. 2021 Apr 19;32(1):15-18. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2021.010. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
4
Should policy makers trust composite indices? A commentary on the pitfalls of inappropriate indices for policy formation.政策制定者是否应该信任综合指数?对不适当的政策制定指数的陷阱的评论。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Mar 22;19(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00702-4.
5
PaCAR: COVID-19 Pandemic Control Decision Making via Large-Scale Agent-Based Modeling and Deep Reinforcement Learning.PaCAR:通过大规模基于代理的建模和深度强化学习进行 COVID-19 大流行控制决策。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Nov;42(8):1064-1077. doi: 10.1177/0272989X221107902. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
6
A coordinated health policy in response to COVID-19: A case of Botswana.应对 COVID-19 的协调卫生政策:博茨瓦纳案例。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2023 Jan;55(1):163-166. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12821. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
7
Decision making under deep uncertainty for pandemic policy planning.大流行政策规划中的深度不确定决策。
Health Policy. 2023 Jul;133:104831. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104831. Epub 2023 May 3.
8
Political Decision Making in the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case of Germany from the Perspective of Risk Management.新冠疫情下的政治决策:以风险管理视角看德国的情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 30;19(1):397. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010397.
9
WICID framework version 1.0: criteria and considerations to guide evidence-informed decision-making on non-pharmacological interventions targeting COVID-19.WICID 框架 1.0 版:指导针对 COVID-19 的非药物干预措施进行循证决策的标准和考虑因素。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Nov;5(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003699.
10
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Governmental Policies on Rehabilitation Services and Physical Medicine in Jordan: A Retrospective Study.COVID-19 大流行和政府政策对约旦康复服务和物理医学的影响:一项回顾性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 20;20(3):1972. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031972.

本文引用的文献

1
Rigorous Policy-Making Amid COVID-19 and Beyond: Literature Review and Critical Insights.新冠疫情期间及之后的严谨政策制定:文献回顾与批判性洞察。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 26;18(23):12447. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312447.
2
Optimizing Decision-Making Processes in Times of COVID-19: Using Reflexivity to Counteract Information-Processing Failures.优化新冠疫情时期的决策过程:运用反思性来对抗信息处理失误。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 22;12:650525. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.650525. eCollection 2021.
3
A Multi-Criteria Framework for Pandemic Response Measures.
多准则框架下的大流行病应对措施
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 20;9:583706. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.583706. eCollection 2021.
4
Rational policymaking during a pandemic.大流行期间的理性决策。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 26;118(4). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2012704118.
5
Evidence-based policy making: determining what is evidence.循证决策:确定何为证据。
Heliyon. 2020 Jul 25;6(7):e04519. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04519. eCollection 2020 Jul.