• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The risks of attrition bias in longitudinal surveys of the impact of COVID-19.关于新冠疫情影响的纵向调查中损耗偏倚的风险。
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2022 Nov 8;36(2):161-164. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2022.2139541. eCollection 2023.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Uncovering survivorship bias in longitudinal mental health surveys during the COVID-19 pandemic.揭示COVID-19大流行期间纵向心理健康调查中的幸存者偏差。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2021 May 26;30:e45. doi: 10.1017/S204579602100038X.
4
Uncovering Survivorship Bias in Longitudinal Mental Health Surveys During the COVID-19 Pandemic.揭示新冠疫情期间纵向心理健康调查中的幸存者偏差
medRxiv. 2021 Apr 6:2021.01.28.21250694. doi: 10.1101/2021.01.28.21250694.
5
Posttreatment attrition and its predictors, attrition bias, and treatment efficacy of the anxiety online programs.焦虑在线项目的治疗后失访情况及其预测因素、失访偏倚和治疗效果。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Oct 14;16(10):e232. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3513.
6
Exposure to COVID-19-Related Information and its Association With Mental Health Problems in Thailand: Nationwide, Cross-sectional Survey Study.暴露于与 COVID-19 相关的信息及其与泰国心理健康问题的关联:全国性、横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 12;23(2):e25363. doi: 10.2196/25363.
7
Engagement, Use, and Impact of Digital Mental Health Resources for Diverse Populations in COVID-19: Community-Partnered Evaluation.COVID-19 中针对不同人群的数字心理健康资源的参与度、使用情况及影响:社区合作评估
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Dec 7;6(12):e42031. doi: 10.2196/42031.
8
Mental disorders, attrition at follow-up, and questionnaire non-completion in epidemiologic research. Illustrations from the CoLaus|PsyCoLaus study.精神障碍、随访脱落和问卷调查不完成在流行病学研究中的情况。来自 CoLaus|PsyCoLaus 研究的说明。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2019 Dec;28(4):e1805. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1805. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
9
Longitudinal associations between mental health conditions and overactive bladder in women veterans.女性退伍军人心理健康状况与膀胱过度活动症之间的纵向关联。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;217(4):430.e1-430.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.06.016. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
10
Prevalence of and Risk Factors Associated With Mental Health Symptoms Among the General Population in China During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.中国新冠肺炎大流行期间普通人群心理健康症状的患病率及其相关危险因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2014053. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14053.

引用本文的文献

1
The mediating role of depression in the association between health-related quality of life and suicidal ideation in adolescents: findings from a longitudinal study.抑郁在青少年健康相关生活质量与自杀意念关联中的中介作用:一项纵向研究的结果
Front Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 14;4:1567387. doi: 10.3389/frcha.2025.1567387. eCollection 2025.
2
Participant engagement in a national longitudinal study of COVID-19: Insights from the INSPIRE study.参与者参与一项关于 COVID-19 的全国纵向研究:来自 INSPIRE 研究的见解。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 22;20(7):e0325948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325948. eCollection 2025.
3
The iceberg model of suicidal ideation and behaviour in Danish adolescents: integration of national registry and self-reported data within a national birth cohort.丹麦青少年自杀意念与行为的冰山模型:全国出生队列中全国登记数据与自我报告数据的整合
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Feb;34(2):611-621. doi: 10.1007/s00787-024-02503-w. Epub 2024 Jun 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in Psychological Distress Among US Adults During Different Phases of the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情大流行不同阶段美国成年人心理困扰趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2144776. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44776.
2
Anxiety sensitivity, COVID-19 fear, and mental health: results from a United States population sample.焦虑敏感、对新冠病毒的恐惧与心理健康:来自美国人群样本的结果。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2021 May;50(3):204-216. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2021.1874505. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
3
Trajectories of Mental Distress Among U.S. Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic.美国成年人在 COVID-19 大流行期间的精神困扰轨迹。
Ann Behav Med. 2021 Mar 16;55(2):93-102. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaa126.
4
Trajectories of anxiety and depressive symptoms during enforced isolation due to COVID-19 in England: a longitudinal observational study.因 COVID-19 而在英国强制隔离期间焦虑和抑郁症状的轨迹:一项纵向观察研究。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;8(2):141-149. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30482-X. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
5
Longitudinal changes in mental health and the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from the UK Household Longitudinal Study.心理健康的纵向变化与新冠疫情:来自英国家庭纵向研究的证据。
Psychol Med. 2022 Oct;52(13):2549-2558. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720004432. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
6
Mental health and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: longitudinal analyses of adults in the UK COVID-19 Mental Health & Wellbeing study.在 COVID-19 大流行期间的心理健康和福祉:英国 COVID-19 心理健康与福祉研究中成年人的纵向分析。
Br J Psychiatry. 2021 Jun;218(6):326-333. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2020.212.
7
COVID-19 pandemic and mental health consequences: Systematic review of the current evidence.COVID-19 大流行及其对心理健康的影响:当前证据的系统综述。
Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Oct;89:531-542. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.048. Epub 2020 May 30.
8
The Critical Relationship Between Anxiety and Depression.焦虑与抑郁之间的关键关系。
Am J Psychiatry. 2020 May 1;177(5):365-367. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20030305.
9
Conducting Online Surveys.在线调查。
J Hum Lact. 2019 Aug;35(3):413-417. doi: 10.1177/0890334419848734. Epub 2019 May 14.
10
How can we successfully recruit depressed people? Lessons learned in recruiting depressed participants to a multi-site trial of a brief depression intervention (the 'CLASSIC' trial).我们如何成功招募抑郁症患者?在招募抑郁症患者参与一项简短抑郁症干预措施的多中心试验(“CLASSIC”试验)中获得的经验教训。
Trials. 2019 Feb 13;20(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3033-5.

关于新冠疫情影响的纵向调查中损耗偏倚的风险。

The risks of attrition bias in longitudinal surveys of the impact of COVID-19.

作者信息

da Graca Briget, Hall Lauren R, Sanchez Katherine, Bennett Monica M, Powers Mark B, Warren Ann Marie

机构信息

Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, Texas.

School of Social Work, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas.

出版信息

Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2022 Nov 8;36(2):161-164. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2022.2139541. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1080/08998280.2022.2139541
PMID:36876266
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9980691/
Abstract

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, interest in mental health impacts is shifting from short-term to long-term outcomes. As part of a longitudinal online survey study examining mental health impacts of the pandemic, we assessed the risk of attrition bias related to a history of depression-a condition research shows can increase challenges of recruitment and retention. Among 5023 participants who completed the baseline survey, significantly more reporting a history of depression were lost to follow-up: baseline to 3 months: 497/760 (65.4%) vs 2228/4263 (52.3%),  < 0.001; 3 to 6 months: 179/263 (68.1%) vs 1183/2035 (58.1%),  = 0.002. Participants reporting a history of depression also had greater adjusted odds of a Patient Health Questionnaire-8 score ≥10 (odds ratio [OR] = 3.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.27, 4.84), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 score ≥10 (OR = 3.77, 95% CI 3.07, 4.62), and Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale for DSM V score ≥ 28 (OR = 7.17, 95% CI 4.67, 11.00) at baseline, indicating a need to account for attrition bias when examining these outcomes. Similar considerations likely apply to other longitudinal survey studies and are important to address to ensure accurate evidence is available to support policy decisions regarding resource allocation and funding.

摘要

随着新冠疫情持续,人们对心理健康影响的关注正从短期结果转向长期结果。作为一项考察疫情心理健康影响的纵向在线调查研究的一部分,我们评估了与抑郁症病史相关的失访偏倚风险——研究表明,这种情况会增加招募和留住参与者的难度。在完成基线调查的5023名参与者中,报告有抑郁症病史的参与者失访的比例显著更高:从基线到3个月:497/760(65.4%)对2228/4263(52.3%),P<0.001;从3个月到6个月:179/263(68.1%)对1183/2035(58.1%),P=0.002。报告有抑郁症病史的参与者在基线时,患者健康问卷-8得分≥10(优势比[OR]=3.97,95%置信区间[CI]3.27,4.84)、广泛性焦虑障碍-7得分≥10(OR=3.77,95%CI 3.07,4.62)以及创伤后应激障碍诊断量表(DSM-V)得分≥28(OR=7.17,95%CI 4.67,11.00)的调整后优势也更高,这表明在研究这些结果时需要考虑失访偏倚。类似的考虑可能适用于其他纵向调查研究,并且对于确保有准确的证据来支持有关资源分配和资金的政策决策而言,解决这些问题很重要。