• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COVID-19 中针对不同人群的数字心理健康资源的参与度、使用情况及影响:社区合作评估

Engagement, Use, and Impact of Digital Mental Health Resources for Diverse Populations in COVID-19: Community-Partnered Evaluation.

作者信息

Wells Kenneth, Thames April Denise, Young Alexander S, Zhang Lily, Heilemann MarySue V, Romero Daniela Flores, Oliva Adrian, Jones Felica, Tang Lingqi, Brymer Melissa, Elliott Thomas, Arevian Armen

机构信息

Research Center for Health Services and Society, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2022 Dec 7;6(12):e42031. doi: 10.2196/42031.

DOI:10.2196/42031
PMID:36346902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9746673/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic increased disparities for communities burdened by structural barriers such as reduced affordable housing, with mental health consequences. Limited data are available on digital resources for public mental health prevention during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE

The study aim was to evaluate engagement in and impact of free digital resources on the Together for Wellness/Juntos por Nuestro Bienestar (T4W/Juntos) website during COVID-19 in California.

METHODS

A pilot evaluation of T4W/Juntos was performed, with partner agencies inviting providers, clients, and partners to visit the website and complete surveys at baseline (September 20, 2021, to April 4, 2022) and at 4-6-week follow-up (October 22, 2021, to May 17, 2022). Website use was assessed by three engagement items (ease of use, satisfaction, relevance), comfort in use, and use of six resource categories. Primary outcomes at follow-up were depression and anxiety (scores≥3 on Patient Health Questionnaire-2 item [PHQ2] and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2 item [GAD2] scales). Secondary outcomes were post-pre differences in PHQ2 and GAD2 scores, and use of behavioral health hotlines and services the month before follow-up.

RESULTS

Of 366 eligible participants, 315 (86.1%) completed baseline and 193 (61.3%) completed follow-up surveys. Of baseline participants, 72.6% identified as female, and 21.3% identified as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/questioning, and others (LGBTQ+). In terms of ethnicity, 44.0% identified as Hispanic, 17.8% as African American, 26.9% as non-Hispanic white, and 11.4% as other ethnicity. Overall, 32.7% had moderate anxiety or depression (GAD2/PHQ2≥3) at baseline. Predictors of baseline website engagement included being Hispanic versus other race/ethnicity (β=.27, 95% CI .10-.44; P=.002) and number of COVID-19-related behavior changes (β=.09, 95% CI .05-.13; P<.001). Predictors of comfort using the website were preferring English for website use (odds ratio [OR] 5.57, 95% CI 2.22-13.96; P<.001) and COVID-19-related behavior changes (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.12-1.66; P=.002); receiving overnight behavioral health treatment in the prior 6 months (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.69, P=.015) was associated with less comfort in website use. The main predictor of depression at follow-up (PHQ2≥3) was baseline depression (OR 6.24, 95% CI 2.77-14.09; P<.001). Engagement in T4W/Juntos was associated with lower likelihood of depression (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34-0.86; P=.01). Website use the month before follow-up was associated with a post-pre reduction in PHQ2 score (β=-.62, 95% CI -1.04 to -0.20; P=.004). The main predictor of GAD2≥3 at follow-up was baseline GAD2≥3 (OR 13.65, 95% CI 6.06-30.72; P<.001). Greater baseline website engagement predicted reduced hotline use (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.18-0.71; P=.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Ethnicity/language and COVID-19-related behavior changes were associated with website engagement; engagement and use predicted reduced follow-up depression and behavioral hotline use. Findings are based on participants recommended by community agencies with moderate follow-up rates; however, significance was similar when weighting for nonresponse. This study may inform research and policy on digital mental health prevention resources.

摘要

背景

新冠疫情加剧了因经济适用房减少等结构性障碍而负担沉重的社区的不平等现象,并对心理健康产生了影响。关于新冠疫情期间用于公共心理健康预防的数字资源的数据有限。

目的

本研究旨在评估加利福尼亚州新冠疫情期间“共同促进健康/携手共筑福祉”(T4W/Juntos)网站上免费数字资源的参与度及其影响。

方法

对T4W/Juntos进行了一项试点评估,合作机构邀请提供者、客户和合作伙伴访问该网站,并在基线期(2021年9月20日至2022年4月4日)和4-6周随访期(2021年10月22日至2022年5月17日)完成调查。通过三个参与度项目(易用性、满意度、相关性)、使用舒适度以及六个资源类别的使用情况来评估网站使用情况。随访期的主要结局是抑郁和焦虑(患者健康问卷-2项[PHQ2]和广泛性焦虑障碍-2项[GAD2]量表得分≥3)。次要结局是PHQ2和GAD2得分的前后差异,以及随访前一个月行为健康热线和服务的使用情况。

结果

在366名符合条件的参与者中,315名(86.1%)完成了基线调查,193名(61.3%)完成了随访调查。在基线参与者中,72.6%为女性,21.3%为女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿/疑问者及其他(LGBTQ+)群体。在种族方面,44.0%为西班牙裔,17.8%为非裔美国人,26.9%为非西班牙裔白人,11.4%为其他种族。总体而言,32.7%的参与者在基线期有中度焦虑或抑郁(GAD2/PHQ2≥3)。基线期网站参与度的预测因素包括西班牙裔与其他种族/族裔相比(β = 0.27,95%可信区间0.10 - 0.44;P = 0.002)以及与新冠疫情相关的行为变化数量(β = 0.09,95%可信区间0.05 - 0.13;P < 0.001)。使用网站舒适度的预测因素是更喜欢使用英语访问网站(优势比[OR] 5.57,95%可信区间2.22 - 13.96;P < 0.001)以及与新冠疫情相关的行为变化(OR 1.37,95%可信区间1.12 - 1.66;P = 0.002);在过去6个月内接受过夜行为健康治疗(OR 0.15,95%可信区间0.03 - 0.69,P = 0.015)与网站使用舒适度较低相关。随访期抑郁(PHQ2≥3)的主要预测因素是基线期抑郁(OR 6.24,95%可信区间2.77 - 14.09;P < 0.001)。参与T4W/Juntos与抑郁可能性降低相关(OR 0.54,95%可信区间0.34 - 0.86;P = 0.01)。随访前一个月的网站使用与PHQ2得分的前后降低相关(β = -0.62,95%可信区间 -1.04至 -0.20;P = 0.004)。随访期GAD2≥3的主要预测因素是基线期GAD2≥3(OR 13.65,95%可信区间6.06 - 30.72;P < 0.001)。基线期更高的网站参与度预测热线使用减少(OR 0.36,95%可信区间0.18 - 0.71;P = 0.004)。

结论

种族/语言以及与新冠疫情相关的行为变化与网站参与度相关;参与度和使用情况预测随访期抑郁和行为热线使用减少。研究结果基于社区机构推荐的参与者,随访率适中;然而,在对无应答进行加权时,显著性相似。本研究可能为数字心理健康预防资源的研究和政策提供参考。

相似文献

1
Engagement, Use, and Impact of Digital Mental Health Resources for Diverse Populations in COVID-19: Community-Partnered Evaluation.COVID-19 中针对不同人群的数字心理健康资源的参与度、使用情况及影响:社区合作评估
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Dec 7;6(12):e42031. doi: 10.2196/42031.
2
Community Members' Perceptions of a Resource-Rich Well-Being Website in California During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Thematic Analysis.新冠疫情期间加利福尼亚州社区成员对一个资源丰富的幸福网站的认知:定性主题分析
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Mar 25;8:e55517. doi: 10.2196/55517.
3
4
Participants' Engagement With and Results From a Web-Based Integrative Population Mental Wellness Program (CHAMindWell) During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Program Evaluation Study.新冠疫情期间参与者对基于网络的综合人群心理健康项目(CHAMindWell)的参与情况及成果:项目评估研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2023 Oct 26;10:e48112. doi: 10.2196/48112.
5
Supporting Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic Using a Digital Behavior Change Intervention: An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Pre-Post Intervention Study.使用数字行为改变干预措施在 COVID-19 大流行期间支持心理健康:一项开放标签、单臂、干预前后研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Oct 6;5(10):e31273. doi: 10.2196/31273.
6
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Outcomes of a 12-Week Digital Rehabilitation Program for Musculoskeletal Pain: Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study.种族和民族差异对肌肉骨骼疼痛的 12 周数字康复计划结果的影响:前瞻性纵向队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 31;24(10):e41306. doi: 10.2196/41306.
7
Community-partnered cluster-randomized comparative effectiveness trial of community engagement and planning or resources for services to address depression disparities.社区伙伴关系的集群随机对照比较有效性试验,旨在通过社区参与和规划或服务资源来解决抑郁症的差异问题。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Oct;28(10):1268-78. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2484-3. Epub 2013 May 7.
8
Community Engagement and Planning versus Resources for Services for Implementing Depression Quality Improvement: Exploratory Analysis for Black and Latino Adults.社区参与和规划与服务资源在实施抑郁质量改进方面的比较:针对黑人和拉丁裔成年人的探索性分析。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Apr 18;29(2):277-286. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.2.277. eCollection 2019 Spring.
9
Engaging LGBTQ Communities in Community-Partnered Participatory Research: Lessons from the Resilience Against Depression Disparities Study.参与 LGBTQ 社区的社区伙伴参与式研究:从抗抑郁差异研究中获得的经验教训。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2021;15(1):65-74. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2021.0006.
10
Digital Cognitive Behavior Therapy Intervention for Depression and Anxiety: Retrospective Study.用于治疗抑郁和焦虑的数字认知行为疗法干预:回顾性研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Aug 26;7(8):e21304. doi: 10.2196/21304.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Impact of Online Mental Health Resources During the COVID-19 Pandemic on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Questioning Adults Compared to Heterosexual Adults: Pretest-Posttest Survey Analyses.探索新冠疫情期间在线心理健康资源对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿及性取向存疑成年人(LGBTQ+)与异性恋成年人影响的比较:前后测调查分析
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 11;9:e67082. doi: 10.2196/67082.
2
Collaborating with and enabling diverse communities to address health inequities: The experiences of a community engagement and outreach team.与不同社区合作并促使其解决健康不平等问题:一个社区参与和外展团队的经验
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jan 22;9(1):e38. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.7. eCollection 2025.
3
Formative Evaluation of Post-Opera Live Discussion of the Center Cannot Hold Part 2 and Resilience Workshop.中心术后现场讨论第二部分及恢复力工作坊的形成性评估
Community Ment Health J. 2025 May;61(4):776-782. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01407-y. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
4
Acceptance of a French e-Mental Health Information Website (CléPsy) for Families: A Web-Based Survey.法国一个面向家庭的电子心理健康信息网站(CléPsy)的接受度:一项基于网络的调查。
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2024 Aug 15;7:e50978. doi: 10.2196/50978.
5
Community Members' Perceptions of a Resource-Rich Well-Being Website in California During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Thematic Analysis.新冠疫情期间加利福尼亚州社区成员对一个资源丰富的幸福网站的认知:定性主题分析
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Mar 25;8:e55517. doi: 10.2196/55517.
6
Impact of Opera on Resilience and Thriving in Serious Mental Illness: Pilot Evaluation of The Center Cannot Hold Part 2 and Resilience Workshop.歌剧对严重精神疾病患者韧性和茁壮成长的影响:《中心不能容纳第 2 部分》和韧性工作坊的试点评估。
Community Ment Health J. 2024 Jul;60(5):964-971. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01248-9. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
7
The engagement problem: A review of engagement with digital mental health interventions and recommendations for a path forward.参与度问题:关于数字心理健康干预措施参与度的综述及未来发展路径建议
Curr Treat Options Psychiatry. 2023 Sep;10(3):119-135. doi: 10.1007/s40501-023-00297-3. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
8
Clinician and Patient Perspectives on the Use of Passive Mobile Monitoring and Self-Tracking for Patients With Serious Mental Illness: User-Centered Approach.临床医生和患者对严重精神疾病患者使用被动移动监测和自我追踪的看法:以用户为中心的方法。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Oct 24;10:e46909. doi: 10.2196/46909.

本文引用的文献

1
Disruptions to School and Home Life Among High School Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic - Adolescent Behaviors and Experiences Survey, United States, January-June 2021.在 COVID-19 大流行期间高中生的学校和家庭生活中断 - 青少年行为和经验调查,美国,2021 年 1 月至 6 月。
MMWR Suppl. 2022 Apr 1;71(3):28-34. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.su7103a5.
2
Stigma Compounds the Consequences of Clinician Burnout During COVID-19: A Call to Action to Break the Culture of Silence.污名化加剧了新冠疫情期间临床医生职业倦怠的后果:呼吁采取行动打破沉默文化。
NAM Perspect. 2020 May 8;2020. doi: 10.31478/202008b. eCollection 2020.
3
Community-Partnered Development of a Digital Mental Health Resource Website to Support Diverse Communities During the COVID-19 Pandemic.社区伙伴合作开发数字心理健康资源网站,以在 COVID-19 大流行期间支持多样化社区。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2022;33(1):506-516. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2022.0039.
4
The Influence of Human Support on the Effectiveness of Digital Mental Health Promotion Interventions for the General Population.人际支持对普通人群数字心理健康促进干预效果的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 19;12:716106. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.716106. eCollection 2021.
5
COVID-19 and Adolescent Depression and Suicide Risk Screening Outcomes.COVID-19 与青少年抑郁和自杀风险筛查结果。
Pediatrics. 2021 Sep;148(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-051507. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
6
Implementing a digital health model of care in Australian youth mental health services: protocol for impact evaluation.在澳大利亚青少年心理健康服务中实施数字健康护理模式:影响评估方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 12;21(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06394-4.
7
A Rapid Assessment of Disaster Preparedness Needs and Resources during the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间灾害准备需求和资源的快速评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 7;18(2):425. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020425.
8
Addressing Health Disparities in the Rural United States: Advocacy as Caregiving among Community Health Workers and .解决美国农村地区的健康不平等问题:社区卫生工作者的倡导即为关怀。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 10;17(24):9223. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249223.
9
Measuring Cumulative Stressfulness: Psychometric Properties of the COVID-19 Stressors Scale.测量累积压力:COVID-19 应激源量表的心理测量特性。
Health Educ Behav. 2021 Feb;48(1):20-28. doi: 10.1177/1090198120979912. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
10
Mental Health, Substance Use, and Suicidal Ideation During the COVID-19 Pandemic - United States, June 24-30, 2020.《2020 年 6 月 24 日至 30 日美国在新冠疫情期间的心理健康、物质使用和自杀意念状况》
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Aug 14;69(32):1049-1057. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6932a1.