Suppr超能文献

阿片类激动剂治疗服务中的患者和工作人员如何看待戒烟药物和电子烟?

How do patients and staff in an opioid agonist treatment service view smoking cessation medications and e-cigarettes?

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.

School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Rev. 2023 Jul;42(5):1092-1103. doi: 10.1111/dar.13630. Epub 2023 Mar 6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Tobacco use and related mortality is common in people receiving opioid agonist treatment (OAT). Smoking cessation medications are available and e-cigarettes are increasingly recommended for high risk populations. This study explores experience, knowledge and attitudes around smoking cessation medications (nicotine replacement therapy [NRT], bupropion and varenicline) and e-cigarettes in patients and clinicians in two public Australian OAT clinics.

METHODS

Cross-sectional surveys of patients and clinicians and a randomly sampled retrospective medical record review. Patients were recruited through an advertisement in the clinic, and clinicians through advertisement at an educational session.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients and 10 clinicians completed the surveys. Most patients had at least one quit attempt and 43% were currently trying to quit. There were high levels of exposure to NRT, lower levels with varenicline and very limited exposure to bupropion. Patients considered e-cigarettes most helpful, but were more likely to consider using NRT. Few patients reported smoking cessation interventions from their clinicians. Most clinicians identified high tobacco use prevalence, considered this problematic, but reported low rates of smoking cessation intervention. NRT was the preferred medication. E-cigarettes were not considered helpful. Sixty-six percent of the 140 records reviewed documented patients as smokers. Tobacco cessation medication was rarely discussed or provided.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Patients report high rates of tobacco cessation planning, but low rates of intervention. Experience of varenicline and bupropion is limited. E-cigarettes were preferred over varenicline and bupropion. Improving patient's and clinician's knowledge of tobacco cessation medications could improve smoking cessation interventions and uptake of approved medications.

摘要

简介

在接受阿片类激动剂治疗(OAT)的人群中,吸烟和相关死亡率很常见。目前有戒烟药物可用,电子烟也越来越多地推荐给高危人群。本研究探讨了澳大利亚两家公立 OAT 诊所的患者和临床医生在戒烟药物(尼古丁替代疗法 [NRT]、安非他酮和伐尼克兰)和电子烟方面的经验、知识和态度。

方法

对患者和临床医生进行横断面调查,并对随机抽样的回顾性病历进行审查。患者通过诊所的广告招募,临床医生通过教育会议的广告招募。

结果

91 名患者和 10 名临床医生完成了调查。大多数患者至少有过一次戒烟尝试,43%的人目前正在尝试戒烟。NRT 的暴露率较高,伐尼克兰的暴露率较低,安非他酮的暴露率非常有限。患者认为电子烟最有帮助,但更倾向于考虑使用 NRT。很少有患者报告他们的临床医生进行了戒烟干预。大多数临床医生确定吸烟率很高,认为这是个问题,但报告的戒烟干预率很低。NRT 是首选药物。电子烟不被认为有帮助。在审查的 140 份记录中,有 66%记录了患者为吸烟者。很少讨论或提供烟草戒断药物。

讨论和结论

患者报告说有很高的戒烟计划率,但干预率很低。对伐尼克兰和安非他酮的经验有限。电子烟比伐尼克兰和安非他酮更受欢迎。提高患者和临床医生对戒烟药物的了解,可以改善戒烟干预措施和获得批准药物的使用率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验