• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于全球哮喘防治创议及斯内尔药物相互作用的基层医疗哮喘管理系统:准确性与可用性

Asthma Management System in Primary Care Based on Global Initiative for Asthma and Snell's Drug Interaction: Accuracy and Usability.

作者信息

Mohammadpour Saman, Sadoughi Farahnaz, Arshi Saba, Ayani Shirin, Fallahpour Morteza, Bagherzadeh Rafat

机构信息

Department of Health Information Management and Technology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Tanaffos. 2022 Feb;21(2):193-200.

PMID:36879741
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9985120/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The two main pillars of asthma management include regular follow-up and using guidelines in the treatment process. Patient portals enable regular follow-up of disease, and guideline-based decision-support-systems can improve the use of guidelines in the treatment process. Based on the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) and Snell's drug interaction, asthma management system in primary care (AMSPC) includes the capabilities of both mentioned systems. This system was developed to improve regular follow-up and use GINA in the asthma management process. This study aimed to assess the accuracy and usability of the AMSPC based on the GINA and Snell's drug interaction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To assess the accuracy of the system, kappa test was used to calculate the degree of agreement between the suggestions made by the system and the physician's decision for a total of 64 patients selected through convenience sampling method. To assess usability, the Questionnaire for User Interface Satisfaction (QUIS) was used.

RESULTS

The scores of the Kappa for the agreements between the system and the physician in determining "drug type and dosage", "follow-up time", and "drug interactions" were 0.90, 0.94, and 0.94, respectively. The average score of the QUIS was 8.6 out of 9.

CONCLUSION

Due to the high accuracy of the system in computerizing the GINA and Snell's drug interaction, as well as its proper usability, it is expected that the system be widely used to improve asthma management and reduce drug interactions.

摘要

背景

哮喘管理的两大主要支柱包括定期随访以及在治疗过程中遵循指南。患者门户网站可实现对疾病的定期随访,而基于指南的决策支持系统能够在治疗过程中提高指南的遵循程度。基于全球哮喘防治创议(GINA)和斯内尔药物相互作用,基层医疗中的哮喘管理系统(AMSPC)具备上述两个系统的功能。该系统旨在改善哮喘管理过程中的定期随访并应用GINA。本研究旨在评估基于GINA和斯内尔药物相互作用的AMSPC的准确性和可用性。

材料与方法

为评估该系统的准确性,采用kappa检验计算系统给出的建议与医生决策之间的一致程度,共纳入通过便利抽样法选取的64例患者。为评估可用性,使用了用户界面满意度调查问卷(QUIS)。

结果

在确定“药物类型和剂量”“随访时间”以及“药物相互作用”方面,系统与医生之间的kappa一致性评分分别为0.90、0.94和0.94。QUIS的平均得分为8.6(满分9分)。

结论

由于该系统在将GINA和斯内尔药物相互作用计算机化方面具有较高准确性,且可用性良好,预计该系统将被广泛应用于改善哮喘管理并减少药物相互作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef2c/9985120/4f22ef81c29a/Tanaffos-21-193-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef2c/9985120/20f22220fe98/Tanaffos-21-193-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef2c/9985120/621ac7880fdf/Tanaffos-21-193-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef2c/9985120/4f22ef81c29a/Tanaffos-21-193-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef2c/9985120/20f22220fe98/Tanaffos-21-193-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef2c/9985120/621ac7880fdf/Tanaffos-21-193-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef2c/9985120/4f22ef81c29a/Tanaffos-21-193-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Asthma Management System in Primary Care Based on Global Initiative for Asthma and Snell's Drug Interaction: Accuracy and Usability.基于全球哮喘防治创议及斯内尔药物相互作用的基层医疗哮喘管理系统:准确性与可用性
Tanaffos. 2022 Feb;21(2):193-200.
2
Determining the Best Tool Comparable with Global Initiative for Asthma Criteria for Assessing Pediatric Asthma Control.确定用于评估儿童哮喘控制情况的与全球哮喘倡议标准相媲美的最佳工具。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol. 2021 Sep;34(3):89-96. doi: 10.1089/ped.2020.1334. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
3
The Asthma Control Test, Japanese Version (ACT-J) as a Predictor of Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Guideline-Defined Asthma Control: Analysis of a Questionnaire-Based Survey.作为全球哮喘防治创议(GINA)指南定义的哮喘控制预测指标的日本版哮喘控制测试(ACT-J):基于问卷调查的分析
Allergol Int. 2013;62(3):323-330. doi: 10.2332/allergolint.13-OA-0535. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
4
Consistency of GINA criteria and childhood asthma control test on the determination of asthma control.GINA 标准与儿童哮喘控制测试在哮喘控制判定上的一致性。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2012 Feb;23(1):34-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2011.01232.x. Epub 2011 Dec 4.
5
The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA): 25 years later.全球哮喘倡议(GINA):25 年后。
Eur Respir J. 2019 Aug 29;54(2). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00598-2019. Print 2019 Aug.
6
[Cost-effectiveness of an intervention based on the Global INitiative for Asthma (GINA) recommendations using a computerized clinical decision support system: a physicians randomized trial].[基于全球哮喘防治创议(GINA)建议并使用计算机化临床决策支持系统的干预措施的成本效益:一项医生随机试验]
Med Clin (Barc). 2005 Feb 19;124(6):201-6. doi: 10.1157/13071758.
7
The Asthma Control Test, Japanese version (ACT-J) as a predictor of Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guideline-defined asthma control: analysis of a questionnaire-based survey.《哮喘控制测试》日本版(ACT-J)作为全球哮喘倡议(GINA)指南定义的哮喘控制的预测指标:基于问卷调查的分析。
Allergol Int. 2013 Sep;62(3):323-30. doi: 10.2332/allergolint.13-OA-0535. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
8
Are the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Guidelines Being Correctly Used to Diagnose Severe Asthma in the UAE?全球哮喘防治创议(GINA)指南在阿联酋是否被正确用于诊断重度哮喘?
Cureus. 2020 Dec 25;12(12):e12278. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12278.
9
Use of Global initiative for asthma (GINA) guidelines in asthma management among paediatric residents in a Sub Saharan African country: a cross-sectional descriptive study.撒哈拉以南非洲国家儿科住院医师在哮喘管理中应用全球哮喘防治创议(GINA)指南:一项横断面描述性研究
Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Jun 15;27:120. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.27.120.9260. eCollection 2017.
10
Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines: 15 years of application.全球哮喘倡议(GINA)指南:15 年的应用历程。
Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2009 May;5(3):239-49. doi: 10.1586/eci.09.1.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Portal Usage and Outcomes Among Adult Patients with Uncontrolled Asthma.成人哮喘控制不佳患者的患者门户网站使用情况及结果
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Mar;8(3):965-970.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.09.034. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
2
The advantages and limitations of guideline adaptation frameworks.指南改编框架的优缺点。
Implement Sci. 2018 May 29;13(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0763-4.
3
Asthma guidelines: the Global Initiative for Asthma in relation to national guidelines.哮喘指南:与国家指南相关的全球哮喘防治创议
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Apr;17(2):99-103. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000346.
4
Asthma costs and social impact.哮喘的成本与社会影响。
Asthma Res Pract. 2017 Jan 6;3:1. doi: 10.1186/s40733-016-0029-3. eCollection 2017.
5
Is asthma prevalence still increasing?哮喘患病率仍在上升吗?
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2016;10(1):39-51. doi: 10.1586/17476348.2016.1114417. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
6
Difficult-to-control asthma: epidemiology and its link with environmental factors.难治性哮喘:流行病学及其与环境因素的联系。
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Oct;15(5):397-401. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000195.
7
Using decision support for population tracking of adherence to recommended asthma guidelines.利用决策支持系统对哮喘推荐指南的依从性进行人群追踪。
BMJ Open. 2014 Mar 4;4(3):e003759. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003759.
8
The poorly explored impact of uncontrolled asthma.未被充分探究的哮喘失控影响。
Chest. 2013 Feb 1;143(2):511-523. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-0412.
9
A careflow management system for chronic patients.一种针对慢性病患者的护理流程管理系统。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 1):673-7.
10
Accuracy of a web-based system for monitoring chronic wounds.基于网络的慢性伤口监测系统的准确性
Telemed J E Health. 2003 Summer;9(2):129-40. doi: 10.1089/153056203766437471.