Chen Shirui, Yang Qixin, Lim Sukbin
Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Washington, Lewis Hall 201, Box 353925, Seattle, WA 98195-3925, USA.
Neural Science, New York University Shanghai, 1555 Century Avenue, Shanghai, 200122, China.
iScience. 2023 Feb 13;26(3):106182. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106182. eCollection 2023 Mar 17.
Finding the form of synaptic plasticity is critical to understanding its functions underlying learning and memory. We investigated an efficient method to infer synaptic plasticity rules in various experimental settings. We considered biologically plausible models fitting a wide range of studies and examined the recovery of their firing-rate dependence from sparse and noisy data. Among the methods assuming low-rankness or smoothness of plasticity rules, Gaussian process regression (GPR), a nonparametric Bayesian approach, performs the best. Under the conditions measuring changes in synaptic weights directly or measuring changes in neural activities as indirect observables of synaptic plasticity, which leads to different inference problems, GPR performs well. Also, GPR could simultaneously recover multiple plasticity rules and robustly perform under various plasticity rules and noise levels. Such flexibility and efficiency, particularly at the low sampling regime, make GPR suitable for recent experimental developments and inferring a broader class of plasticity models.
找到突触可塑性的形式对于理解其在学习和记忆中的功能至关重要。我们研究了一种在各种实验环境中推断突触可塑性规则的有效方法。我们考虑了适合广泛研究的生物学上合理的模型,并研究了从稀疏和有噪声的数据中恢复其放电率依赖性的情况。在假设可塑性规则具有低秩性或平滑性的方法中,高斯过程回归(GPR),一种非参数贝叶斯方法,表现最佳。在直接测量突触权重变化或测量神经活动变化作为突触可塑性间接观测值的条件下,这会导致不同的推理问题,GPR表现良好。此外,GPR可以同时恢复多个可塑性规则,并在各种可塑性规则和噪声水平下稳健运行。这种灵活性和效率,特别是在低采样率情况下,使GPR适用于最近的实验发展,并推断出更广泛的可塑性模型类别。