Beaudry Catherine, Prozesky Heidi, St-Pierre Carl, Mirnezami Seyed Reza
Department of Mathematics and Industrial Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Centre Interuniversitaire de Recherche sur la Science et la Technologie (CIRST), Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Front Res Metr Anal. 2023 Feb 20;8:1040823. doi: 10.3389/frma.2023.1040823. eCollection 2023.
A large body of literature on gender differences in scientific publication output has clearly established that women scientists publish less that men do. Yet, no single explanation or group of explanations satisfactorily accounts for this difference, which has been called the "productivity puzzle". To provide a more refined portrait of the scientific publication output of women in relation to that of their male peers, we conducted a web-based survey in 2016 of individual researchers across all African countries, except Libya. The resulting 6,875 valid questionnaires submitted by respondents in the STEM, Health Science and SSH fields were analyzed using multivariate regressions on the self-reported number of articles published in the preceding 3 years. Controlling for a variety of variables including career stage, workload, mobility, research field, and collaboration, we measured the direct and moderating effect of gender on scientific production of African researchers. Our results show that, while women's scientific publication output is positively affected by collaboration and age (impediments to women's scientific output decrease later in their careers), it is negatively impacted by care-work and household chores, limited mobility, and teaching hours. Women are as prolific when they devote the same hours to other academic tasks and raise the same amount of research funding as their male colleagues. Our results lead us to argue that the standard academic career model, relying on continuous publications and regular promotions, assumes a masculine life cycle that reinforces the general perception that women with discontinuous careers are less productive than their male colleagues, and systematically disadvantages women. We conclude that the solution resides beyond women's empowerment, i.e., in the broader institutions of education and the family, which have an important role to play in fostering men's equal contribution to household chores and care-work.
大量关于科学出版物产出中性别差异的文献清楚地表明,女科学家的发表量少于男科学家。然而,没有单一的解释或一组解释能够令人满意地说明这种差异,这种差异被称为“生产力谜题”。为了更精确地描绘女性相对于男性同行的科学出版物产出情况,我们于2016年对除利比亚以外的所有非洲国家的个体研究人员进行了一项基于网络的调查。对来自STEM、健康科学和社会科学与人文领域的受访者提交的6875份有效问卷进行了分析,采用多元回归分析了他们在前三年自我报告的发表文章数量。在控制了包括职业阶段、工作量、流动性、研究领域和合作等各种变量后,我们测量了性别对非洲研究人员科研产出的直接和调节作用。我们的研究结果表明,虽然女性的科学出版物产出受到合作和年龄的积极影响(女性科研产出的障碍在其职业生涯后期会减少),但它受到护理工作和家务、有限的流动性以及教学时间的负面影响。当女性投入与男性同事相同的时间用于其他学术任务并筹集相同数量的研究资金时,她们的成果同样丰硕。我们的研究结果使我们认为,依赖持续发表和定期晋升的标准学术职业模式假定了一种男性化的生命周期,强化了一种普遍观念,即职业不连续的女性比男性同事的生产力低,并系统性地使女性处于不利地位。我们得出结论,解决方案不仅仅在于增强女性权能,即在更广泛的教育和家庭机构中,这些机构在促进男性平等分担家务和护理工作方面可以发挥重要作用。