Barrutia Leire, Vega-Gutiérrez Jesús, Santamarina-Albertos Alba
Dermatology, Medicine and Toxicology Department, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Dermatology Department, Clinical University Hospital of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Dermatol Pract Concept. 2023 Jan 1;13(1):e2023020. doi: 10.5826/dpc.1301a20.
Dermatological information on social media is dominated by misleading and potentially harmful content from nonexperts. Literature suggests that, to address this issue, dermatologists should develop an online presence. However, the successful presence of dermatologists on social media has been criticized for focusing on cosmetic dermatology and not representing the broad spectrum of the specialty.
The aim of this study was to systematically analyze which dermatological topics interest the public most, and to find out whether it is feasible for a dermatologist to become influential on social media while presenting all dermatological topics equally.
The study was performed on an educational dermatology YouTube channel. The 101 videos published in a two-year period were divided into cosmetic (51 videos) and medical dermatology (50 videos). Student's t-test was conducted to determine whether there were significant differences in views. Medical dermatology videos were then classified into three categories: Acne, facial dermatoses (excluding acne) and other dermatological diseases. A Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare these three categories and cosmetic dermatology.
When comparing cosmetic and medical dermatology, no significant differences were found. When comparing the four categories, cosmetic dermatology and acne were found to generate significantly more views that other dermatological diseases.
The public seems to be particularly interested in cosmetic dermatology and acne. This might make it challenging to become successful on social media while presenting a balanced portrayal of dermatology. However, focusing on popular topics can provide a real chance to be influential and protect vulnerable people from misinformation.
社交媒体上的皮肤科信息主要由非专业人士提供的误导性且可能有害的内容主导。文献表明,为解决这一问题,皮肤科医生应建立在线形象。然而,皮肤科医生在社交媒体上的成功形象因专注于美容皮肤科而受到批评,未能全面展现该专业领域。
本研究旨在系统分析公众最感兴趣的皮肤科话题,并探究皮肤科医生在社交媒体上平等呈现所有皮肤科话题的同时成为有影响力人物是否可行。
该研究在一个皮肤科教育YouTube频道上进行。在两年内发布的101个视频分为美容皮肤科(51个视频)和医学皮肤科(50个视频)。采用学生t检验来确定观看量是否存在显著差异。然后将医学皮肤科视频分为三类:痤疮、面部皮肤病(不包括痤疮)和其他皮肤科疾病。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验来比较这三类以及美容皮肤科。
比较美容皮肤科和医学皮肤科时,未发现显著差异。比较这四类时,发现美容皮肤科和痤疮的观看量明显多于其他皮肤科疾病。
公众似乎对美容皮肤科和痤疮特别感兴趣。这可能使得皮肤科医生在社交媒体上成功且全面地呈现皮肤科领域变得具有挑战性。然而,专注于热门话题可以提供一个真正有影响力的机会,并保护易受伤害的人群免受错误信息的影响。